1.
p. 505: What is “the true psychology”? What is the meaning of “the evolution of the
psyche”?
2.
p. 505: What has coming in touch with the Ego to do
with the “Path”? What is the “Path” in
relation to the Ego?
3.
p. 505: What would it mean to “work scientifically
with the problem of one’s own evolution”?
Are you doing so? In what ways,
yes; in what ways, no?
4.
p. 505: Why does the Tibetan state that all that a
human unit can understand is “the manifestation of the solar Logos in a
physical body”? In what way do we
receive information anent the solar Logos which relates to His manifestation in
other than his physical body?
5.
p. 505: In your own words, what does it mean that
spirit meets matter and produces “the Son, or the Ego, the consciousness aspect”? This is, by now, so trite a truism that it
may fail to mean much through constant repetition. In what way can you throw any further light
upon it?
6.
pp. 505-506: Why is the egoic manifestation called “the
place of at-one-ment, and (after due evolutionary cycles) the place of balance,
or of equilibrium”? What is being
at-oned? What is being balanced? In what ways do you experience this
at-onement or balancing?
7.
p. 506: Discuss man as “the perfect six-pointed star”? What stage of evolution is indicated when man
achieves the status of the six-pointed star?
Why? In what way can the
threefold personality and the threefold Triad be “perfectly produced” through
the causal body? How does the
six-pointed star become a five-pointed star?
What has elimination of the physical body to do with producing a “perfected
manasaputra”?
8.
p. 506: How, in
terms of fire, would you characterized the difference between the three
fires: fire by friction, solar fire and electric fire?
9.
p. 506: Give your interpretation of the following
anent solar fire: “This central blaze
inevitably in due course burns up the third fire, or absorbs its essence, and
is itself eventually blended with the fire of the Spirit and passes out of
objective display.” What, really, is the
burning up of the third fire? In what way is the essence of the third fire
absorbed into the second fire? What do
you think is happening when solar fire is blended with the fire of Spirit? Give your answers to these questions both in
terms of form and of consciousness.
10. p. 506:
What, do you suppose are the “old” ways of dealing with the subject of
the causal body? How do they differ from
the method of discussing the causal body in terms of “occult electrical
phenomena”?
11. p. 506:
What is the “moment of
individualisation.”?
12. p. 507:
Interpret the following: “The
force or energy that pours through from the higher planes (the breath of the
Monad, if you care so to term it) produces a vacuum, or something analogous to
a bubble in koilon, and the sheath of the causal body—the ring-pass-not of the
central Life is formed”. What, in your
own words is the “breath of the Monad”? Why
a breath? What is “koilon” and a “bubble in koilon”? What, do you suppose, has the production of a
“vacuum” to do with the creation of the causal body?
13. p. 507:
Why is the mental unit numbered among the three permanent atoms included
within the causal periphery, and not
the manasic permanent atom?
14. p. 507:
What does it meant that the permanent atoms “correspond individually to
the seventh principle of each of the three persons of the microcosmic triad
...”? In answering this, focus upon the
function of the seventh principle, and how, in the microcosm, the permanent
atom possibly fulfills this function.
15. p. 507:
Is the physical sun the “physical permanent atom of the Logos”? What references support this idea? What reference in A Treatise on Cosmic
Fire seem to contradict this concept?
16. p. 507:
What might H.P.B. mean when she suggests that the visible sun is “the
seventh principle of the Brahma aspect ... ”?
17. p. 507:
Give your interpretation of the following: “The three permanent atoms are in themselves
centres of force, or those aspects of the personality which hold hid the fires
of substance, or of objectivity.” What
is, actually, a “center of force”? How
is it that a permanent atom holds hid the
fires of substance or of objectivity? What
is the meaning of the hiddenness?
18. p. 507:
In what way does it seem correct to you to consider the systemic mental
plane as the gaseous body in the
physical body or the planetary Logos? What
are the definitive qualities of gaseousness? What qualities do the mental plane and gaseousness have in common?
19. p. 507:
Consider the flammability of gas in relation to the destruction of the
causal body at the fourth initiation.
20. p. 507:
Can one unit of egoic consciousness be separated from another? How yes?
How no? Consult Initiation
Human and Solar for descriptions
of the egoic body touching on this question?
When you are in soul consciousness, describe the degree of separation from other egoic
consciousnesses which you feel.
21. p. 507:
What is the relation between a planetary Logos and the Monad? Consider, here, that a Monad is that which
has its home within the Sun. Consult
Rule I in the Rules for Applicants in Initiation Human and Solar. If
a Monad is a cell to a Heavenly Man
what is it to the Logos?
22. p. 508:
What are the “spiritual potentialities” hidden within the causal body? What does it mean that the “life within” the
causal body “steadily develops these potentialities and produces certain
definite results by the utilisation of the three permanent atoms”?
23. p. 508:
From the perspective of the Monad, what is the purpose of the
vivification and awakening of the permanent atoms?
24. p. 508:
Discuss the permanent atoms in relation to their fourfold purpose:
They
are the distributors of a certain type of force. They are the conservers of
faculty or ability to respond to a particular vibration. They are the assimilators of experience and the
transmuters of that experience into quality. This is the direct result of the
work of the egoic Ray as it plays upon the atom. They hold hid the memory of
the unit of consciousness. When fully vibrant they are the raison d'etre for the continuity of the consciousness of the man
functioning in the causal body. This distinction must be carefully made.
25. p. 508:
Why should the condition of full vibrancy of these atoms be the raison d’être for the continuity of
consciousness?
26. p. 508:
Why, when studying the permanent atoms, does the Tibetan insist that we
remember that we are “dealing with the logoic dense physical body”?
27. p. 508:
Is there or is there not such a thing as etheric consciousness? If
not, what happens when a man “achieves the consciousness of the Spirit Triad,
and transfers his polarisation into the three triadal permanent atoms” and “is
simply able to function consciously in
the etheric body of his particular planetary Logos”?
28. p. 509:
In relation to man’s triadal functioning the Tibetan says the following: “Work out the analogy in the microcosmic
development and note how in order to function consciously in his individual
etheric body a man has to burn though what has been called the etheric web, and
study how the fires of initiation produce something analogous in the planetary
etheric body, and eventually in the etheric.”
What ideas come to you as you follow the lines indicated by the Tibetan?
29. p. 509:
Discuss the idea of the “burning ground” in relation to the burning of
etheric webs—both planetary and individual.
What on the micro-energy level do you suppose it means that the etheric
web is consumed by fire? Discuss the
relationship existing between planetary achievement and the achievement of the
individual man.
30. p. 509:
Comment on the following with respect to the planetary Logos and the cells in his body: “When all the units or cells in His body have
achieved, He too is set free from dense manifestation and physically dies”. Realize
that only human and deva units are considered as cells within the body of a planetary Logos, but there are many
other forms of life within such a Logos?
Why is planetary logoic liberation focussed so much upon human and deva
units? Consider in this respect, the “death”
of the Moon, and find references which point to the reason for this death.
31. p. 509:
What, do you suppose, would be the nature of planetary “etheric
existence”?
32. p. 509:
Compare the post-mortem states of man and the logoi (both planetary and
solar). What phases do they share in
common? From this consideration, what do
we learn about the condition of the planetary and solar logoi following what we
call obscuration?
33. p. 509:
Does the term “Chohan” apply only to initiates of the sixth degree? Can you find a reference in A Treatise on
Cosmic Fire to support your answer? How
high do you suppose the ken of the highest chohan reaches?
34. p. 509:
Is the Brahma aspect the most important aspect of the Solar Logos? Why or why not?
35. p. 509:
Give your interpretation of the following statement by T. Subba Row,
from Some Thoughts on the Gita: “Each human centre is a crystallized ray
of the Absolute One that has worked through the processes of evolution into
what is known as a human being.” What is
probably meant by “a crystallized ray”? Moreover,
what thoughts come to you when you think of a ray of the Absolute?
36. p. 510:
Interpret the following: Each of the seven Rays—viewed in
connection with the causal bodies of men demonstrates as a unity on the first
subplane, as a triplicity on the second and as seven on the third, forming
there the forty-nine groups which most concern evolving man”. Why this method of division in relation to
the three subplanes of the systemic mental plane? What implications have these numbers for the
way in which we number the various ashrams?
The ashrams were moved to the buddhic plane, probably some time after the writing of this text. In your opinion, is the present information,
therefore, accurate? What does it
actually mean that the ashrams were moved to the buddhic plane? What impact does this move have upon causal
bodies? Did they too move, or not? Why or why not? Refer to Letters on Occult Meditation, pp. 38-39, enumerations of groups of
egos on the mental, buddhic, atmic and monadic planes. Interpret the way this information relates to
that just studied in A Treatise on Cosmic Fire. Is the information further
explanatory or seemingly contradictory? Consider
the following statement by the Tibetan in TCF
in this regard: “According to the angle of vision, this numbering of groups
may be increased or lessened, but for purpose of studying the aspects of mind,
the above enumeration suffices.”
37. p. 510:
Can you see any connection between the movement from unity to triplicity
to a septenary structure with regard to the three subplanes of the higher
mental plane and the idea that the focus of the egoic lotus changes subplanes
as evolution proceeds and initiation is undertaken?
38. p. 510:
Does the following refer to the egoic or monadic ray?: “In the course of his many septenary lives,
and as the cyclic sevens pass over him, man passes under the influence of the
seven sub-rays of his own Ray. Then he
begins to synthesize and merge the seven into the major three sub-rays,
returning to unity on his own egoic Ray.”
What, in terms of a given egoic ray, does it mean to synthesize and
merge the seven into the major three sub-rays?
Are we talking here of personality rays as sub-rays of the egoic ray? If so, what is being said? If the egoic ray is meant, does this mean
that as the third initiation is approached, personalities are found only upon
the Rays of Aspect? Or what? What does it mean to return to unity on one’s
own egoic Ray? What is this returning to
unity?
39. p. 510:
Can the idea of achieving “the unity of his Ray” be related to Monadic
consciousness? Are there other possible
interpretations? If so, what?
40. p. 510:
Why is a man not consciously a
part of the body of his Heavenly Man until the fifth initiation. Why do the third and fourth initiations,
focussed respectively upon the manasic and buddhic planes, not qualify him for
this kind of consciousness?
41. p. 510:
Study the tabulation on p. 510 and work out the idea presented “in
connection with the awakening of life forces within the permanent atoms,
viewing each atom as the seventh principle in each of the three aspects of the
personality.” In answering this, offer
ideas concerning the vitalization of the spirillae at different stages of
evolution.
42. p. 510:
Discuss in general the reasons for the importance of the astral
permanent atom in our present solar system.
43. p. 511:
Why do you suppose the center of polarisation for the fourth or human
kingdom is the astral consciousness? What
are the implications of this polarisation?
Describe the meaning of the connection existing between the monadic the
buddhic and the astral planes.
44. p. 511:
Is the goal set before humanity that of becoming Masters of the Wisdom,
or Lords of Compassion? Why? What is the difference between the two?
45. p. 511:
What does it mean to be a conscious unit “in the body of a Dragon of
Wisdom”?
46. p. 511:
At what point can a man “function consciously in the buddhic vehicle”? What would this type of awareness be like? What actually does it mean in terms of
consciousness and behavior that “the astral permanent atom is superseded by the
buddhic permanent atom”?
47. p. 511:
What is the possible analogy in the life of a human unit to the idea
that “the second aspect of the Logos (that of love or the manifestation of the
love nature of the Logos through the medium of the Son) is the one demonstrated
in this system”?
48. p. 511:
Describe our Solar Logos as a “Son of Necessity, or of desire”. What is a “Son of Necessity”? Is there a difference between being a Son of
Necessity and a “Son of Desire”? What
difference, if any?
49. p. 511:
What might the Tibetan mean by the “key of the cosmic Ray of Love”? To what extent is He speaking in musical
terms? From whence, do you suppose, does
this “cosmic Ray of Love” emanate?
50. p. 511:
The Tibetan says, ostensibly of the Monads within our solar system, that
“the monads of love are the dominating quality.
I choose this word ‘quality’ specifically”. What do you suppose, is here meant by “dominating
quality”, and why is the word “quality” chosen specifically?
51. p. 511:
Give your interpretation of the following oft quoted sentence: “The centre in the cosmic body of the ONE
ABOUT WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID
of which our solar Logos is the embodied force is the heart centre.” Which ONE
ABOUT WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID
are we talking about, or do you think there is only one? Why is the sentence
quoted one of the clues to the mystery of electricity?
52. p. 511:
The following sentence has a number of esoteric implications. What do you think they are? “The sacred planets, with certain allied
etheric spheres with the ring-pass-not, are parts of that heart centre, and are
‘petals in the Lotus,’ or in the heart centre of that great unknown Existence.” What may be meant by “certain allied etheric
spheres”? How many do you think there
might be? What might be the specific
meaning of the word ‘in’ as “in the heart centre”?
53. p. 511:
Discuss the implications of the idea that planets can be considered as ‘petals’
in a Lotus? If this is the case, what
more advanced interpretation can we give to the idea of a petal?
54. p. 511-512: A fascinating analogy is here presented. We learn of a “great unknown Existence, Who
stands tot he solar Logos as He in His turn stands to the Heavenly Men Who are
His centres, and specifically as He stands to the particular Heavenly Man Who
is the embodied force of the logoic Heart centre”. Which particular Heavenly Man do you believe
stands for the heart center of our solar Logos and why? Is this Heavenly Man connected not only with
our solar Logos but with the “great Existence”?
If so, how so?
55. p. 512:
Why, at this point, is the Tibetan at particular pains to stress that
the word LOVE
is both handicapping and misleading?
56. p. 512:
Can you point to any evidence that LOVE is the paramount force found in
the manifestation of a solar Logos
and of a Heavenly Man? Why does the Tibetan use here the word “a”
instead of “our” with reference to the solar Logos in question? Note that the word “force” is used. Can you tie this use to the usual distinction
made between “energy” and “force”, or do you think these words are sometimes
used by the Tibetan in a more exacting manner than at other times?
57. p. 512:
Give your understanding of why the Tibetan calls a planetary Logos a “Dragon
of Wisdom-Love”? Why is the word “Dragon”
used at all?
58. p. 512:
What are the implications of the idea that the astral permanent atom is
in direct alignment with the “the cosmic existence”? This means, does it not, that astral
responses within our solar system are strengthened by extra-systemic power?
59. p. 512:
How or why is it that “this force” emanating from “the great existence”
will “when rightly directed and properly controlled” act as “the great
transmuting agency, which eventually will make of the human unit a Master of
the Wisdom, a Lord of Love, a Dragon of Wisdom in lesser degree”?
60. p. 512:
What are the implications of the fact that our solar Logos “is polarised
in His cosmic astral sheath and has not yet attained cosmic mental polarisation
...”? What would it mean for Him to
attain “cosmic mental polarisation”? Which
cosmic initiation would this represent and why?
Which initiation is He currently working upon?
61. p. 512:
The Tibetan states that a careful pondering of the five points listed on
pp. 511-512 will offer clues to a number of problems. From pondering these points, what clues do
you receive? For instance: What may be the “causes of heat within our
solar system”? How are the methods of
the cosmic Law of Attraction and Repulsion revealed somewhat by the “five
facts”? How do these facts contain clues
to the “question of SEX”? What is the “Divine Hermaphrodite”? Is this Hermaphrodite on a planetary or solar
level?
62. p. 513:
The Tibetan states the force coming through the astral permanent atom
may be considered “as bearing upon [man’s] physical manifestation in a manner
twice as strong as that reaching him through the other two”? Do you believe that this is an accurate
assessment? If so, why?
63. p. 513:
Why should the second Ray be called the “Divine Ray”? What does it mean that “ ... this Ray is the
sumtotal of the radiation of the Lords of Wisdom, the Heavenly Men, the Dragons
Who are unity and Who are Love”?
64. p. 513:
Why is the Divine Ray called “ ... the swan with the seven young ones”? Has swan imagery anything to do with the
second Ray?
65. p. 513:
Interpret the following statement anent the Heavenly Men: “Their life animates every atom of substance
when built into form, and Their life is the sumtotal of Logoic magnetism, or
the great desire nature of the Logos going out after the Not-Self, producing
the cosmic Marriage; it is the logoic demonstration of the sex appeal, His
search for His polar opposite, and their mystic union”? How can such statements be attributed to the
Heavenly Men collectively? Do not many
of these attributes belong more specifically to the great second Ray?
66. p. 513:
Give your interpretation of the following: “Love-Wisdom is the manifestation of the
astral (or desire) nature of the Solar Logos.”
Do you believe that the astral or desire nature of this great Logos is
the ultimate source of His Love-Wisdom? What
other aspects of His constitution might wisely be considered the source of the
Love-Wisdom which animates Him? In
answering this question, consider both His soul and personality Rays.
67. p. 514:
In what way can the permanent atoms be seen as analogous to electrons in
the atom?
68. p. 514:
At the heart of the causal vehicle is said to exist “a central blaze of
light, emitting rays; these Rays are given sevenfold in number, and play upon
... ” the permanent atoms. What are
these rays?
69. p. 514:
What is the implication of the fact that the physical permanent atom “has
a position relatively close to the positive centre” [of the causal vehicle]?
70. p. 514:
Discuss the relationship between the Egoic Ray and the permanent atoms. Use information found on this page and also
upon p. 508. What is the significance of
the fact that force from the positive center is passed through the physical
permanent atom to the astral permanent atom “in the form of five rays of
parti-coloured light”? Why five, do you think?
71. p. 514:
What is the analogy in the consciousness of the human unit to the
phenomenal blending and merging of the physical and astral permanent atoms
under of the influence of the force from the positive center?
72. p. 514:
What is the significance of the fact that the mental unit has a position
within the causal body farthest from the positive nucleus? To what phase in human development does the
interaction of the blended physical and astral permanent atoms with the mental
unit correspond?
73. p. 514:
D.K. suggests that the blended points (astral and physical permanent
atoms) are seen “circulating around their positive centre.” What thoughts come to you in this regard?
74. p. 514:
Does it seem to you that D.K. is suggesting that the three points
enclosed within the causal periphery are the “three fires of the personality”?
75. p. 514:
At what point in the evolutionary history of the human being will the
three points coalesce into a single “blazing unit”? What factors in consciousness correspond with
this merging into one?
76. p. 514:
We read of the “blazing unit” (the three points combined into one and
greatly vitalized) that “this blazing unit, through the combined heat of its
being, burns up the causal body, and escapes back on to the planes of
abstraction”. Does this mean that the
activity of the blazing unit is entirely responsible for the destruction of the
causal body? If not, what other factors
are involved. Try to find and cite
references.
77. p. 514:
What does it mean that “man is the Path itself”? How is it that man burns but is also the
burning ground?
78. pp. 514-515: The Tibetan informs us that, as concerns the
Path and the burning ground (just described in relation to man and his Egoic
Lotus) the analogy, in terms of process, holds good all the way up the scale of
being, including even THE ONE ABOUT WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID. What
thoughts come to you as you being to consider the analogy and think of the Path
and burning ground in relation to an ascending scale of greater beings? Do all of these great beings have causal
bodies? If so, are such causal bodies
all located upon the cosmic mental plane?
If not, what are some other possibilities. Speculate!
79. p. 515:
Give your interpretation of the following definition of a permanent atom: “ ... the interior economy of the life germ
on the three planes which concern man in the three worlds.”
80. p. 515:
Why must a permanent atom be composed of atomic matter? Relate this to the idea that the permanent
atom is “the seventh principle in each of the three sheaths”. Bring in, as well, the relationship between will and the permanent atoms.
81. p. 515:
Discuss the inherent responsiveness
of the permanent atom. How might the
various Heavenly Men relate to the various permanent atoms? How does the influence of a particular
Heavenly Man reach the permanent atom?
82. pp. 515-516: Discuss the form building power of the permanent atom. What, in your opinion, is the “threefold
microcosmic word”? What is the
relationship existing between substance and form (on the one hand) and matter
and objectivity (on the other). Describe
the implications of the fact that astral sound can reverberate upon the
physical plane. What, in this case, does
reverberation mean? How is it that seven centers can appear
suddenly as the result of one sound? Consider
in this regard the functioning of the prism.
What does it really mean that man’s dense physical body is “below the
threshold” and is not considered a principle?
83. p. 516:
Discuss the relative permanency of
the permanent atom. Consider the
following: “In the seventh principle of
all manifesting entities is stored up and developed capacity, acquired ability,
and the atomic memory, or in other words the heredity of the Thinker ... ”
What is the seventh principle of man?
(Remember that the seventh principle of the sheaths is not the seventh principle of the entire
human unit). How might the foregoing
statement by the Tibetan apply to that which is man’s seventh principle? Speculate upon the manner of
experience-storage within the various aspects of man’s constitution. Is such storage sequential or simultaneous?
84. p. 516:
Give your interpretation of the concept of “plane impulse at each fresh cycle of manifestation”.
85. p. 516:
What effects (other than eventual destruction) do “the external fires of
the ego or solar fire” have upon the permanent atom as they “beat upon it with
ever increasing intensity”?
86. p. 516:
Discuss the heat of the
permanent atom. Seek to describe the
differences “between the permanent atoms on all planes, and the atomic matter
of which they form a part”. Why should
these differences or distinctions be one of the guarded secrets of initiation?
87. pp. 516-517: Consider the distinctions between permanent
atoms and atomic matter in general. It
is said that “the permanent atom is one that has been appropriated by one of
the lives that form the centres in
the body of a solar Lord ... ”. What
kind of life or lives form the centers in the body of a solar Lord? What is meant here by the term “solar Lord”? What may be the nature of the “centres” here
noted? Bear in mind that the centers are
directly related to the will aspect (see p. 166). What is the significance to the fact that “a
permanent atom is one which has come under the attractive power of the second
aspect ... ”? Relate this statement to
the foregoing thought that a permanent atom has been appropriated by a life
which is included in a center of a solar Lord.
What is the significance of the fact that “a permanent atom ... is
passing out of the control of the Deva Lord and coming under the control of
positive life”? In light of the
foregoing, what, do you suppose, is the relationship existing between the
permanent atom and the Monad? Enlarge
upon the idea of the permanent atom as an agency for the imposition of Karma. What would it mean that the Lipika Lords have
“exhausted the vibratory capacity of any particular atom”? From the perspectives of life, consciousness
and matter, what happens when a permanent atom passes into obscuration? Relate the blazing of the permanent atom to
the exhaustion of its vibratory capacity.
88. p. 517:
If there are three groups of Lipika Lords, what are their duties and
jurisdictions? Do all Lipikas work with
the permanent atoms of man? If so, what
are the implications of work with the higher
permanent atoms? Do all Lipikas
necessarily work with the matter aspect? Why yes or no? Look beyond this particular page for your
answer.
89. pp. 517-518: Why is but one permanent atom of the solar
Logos to be found upon the cosmic physical plane? What has knowledge of the permanent atoms to
do with understanding the “fundamental being” of the entity utilizing them? The Tibetan discusses this point in relation
to the solar Logos. Apply it to the
human being.
90. p. 518:
Discuss the mystery of the mental unit in relation to the nature of the
Heavenly Man. What is the relation
between the solar Logoic etheric centers upon the buddhi plane and the
collection of causal bodies upon the higher mental planes? What thoughts occur to you when you realize
that the aspects of a Heavenly Man are focussed (so it would seem) one systemic plane lower than the
aspects of the a solar Logos? Is is the
Tibetan saying that the mental unit is the unifier of the four mental centers
found upon the fourth mental subplane? Or
that the mental unit is the unifier of the lower mental body in general? Discuss the difference in origin and purpose
of the permanent atoms as compared with the chakras within the sheaths.
91. p. 518:
Is the etheric manifestation of
both the solar Logos and the Heavenly Man found upon the buddhic plane (the
cosmic etheric plane)? Why or why not? Use various references including p. 522. If so, is there a division of the buddhic
subplanes with respect to Their manifestation?
Please note the reference on this page (518) that the “third aspect” of
the Heavenly Men is found upon the buddhic plane.
92. p. 518:
Consider the higher three subplanes of the logoic plane in relation to
the higher three subplanes of the monadic plane in relation to the higher three
subplanes of the mental plane in relation to the solar Logos, the Heavenly Man
and the human being. What might you
learn from this comparison? While
references to the importance of the higher three subplanes of the systemic
mental plane are abundant, can you find any references to the importance of the
higher three subplanes of the monadic and logoic planes in relation to the
functioning of the Heavenly Men and the solar Logos?
93. p. 519:
What does it mean that “the seventh logoic principle is on the first
plane”? When discussing logoic
principles here, are we speaking in terms of matter or of consciousness?
94. p. 519:
In what specific way is the solar Logos found upon the first systemic plane (the logoic plane) and the
Heavenly Man found upon the second
systemic plane (the monadic plane)?
95. p. 519:
Why is the third systemic plane called “the Spiritual plane”? Why is the “Holy Ghost” associated with this
plane? What is Aether in distinction to
Akasha? Why should air be associated with the buddhic or intuitional plane? What is the “Astral Light” and how is it
related to desire and the plane of desire?
96. p. 519:
Consider footnote three. Discuss
why the number of planes given for the evolution of each of the four beings
listed (Logos, Son, Monad, Human Being) is the correct and appropriate number.
97. p. 519:
Why should seven be “the
number of the totality of manifestation”?
Why should three be “the
number of consciousness”?
98. pp. 519-520: Discuss the kinds of “centres of force” to be
found upon the second systemic plane? What
of centers which are not “principle centers”?
Of what nature might they be? Speculate
as to the various methods of enumeration referencing the following: “Under another enumeration they make the ten
of esoteric life, and can also be enumerated as twelve, thus forming the
twelve-petalled Lotus, or the heart center in the Body of the ONE
ABOUT WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID. How might such enumeration be organized? What is the meaning of the phrase—“the ten of
the esoteric life”? Is there any hint
concealed? Do you think that the
Heavenly Man manifesting through the Earth Scheme can also be found upon the second systemic plane?
99. p. 520:
On the buddhic plane the etheric centers of the Logos are found. Of what do these centers consist?
100. p. 520:
We read that upon the buddhic plane are to be found “the esoteric
planets and the Sun, viewed as the centre of the buddhic principles ... ”. What does the Tibetan mean by the “esoteric
planets”? The sacred planets? The influence
of the sacred planets? Other kinds
of planets—for instance, “etheric” planets?
What do you think? Also, why is
the term “principles” used instead of principle (singular)? Is this a misprint? In what manner can the Sun be found upon the
buddhic plane? Why should the Sun be
connected with the buddhic plane? There
are probably several reasons.
101. p. 520:
Give your interpretation of the Trinity in relation to the aspects of
the solar Logos to be found upon the three higher systemic planes.
102. p. 520:
If most ashrams are to be found upon the buddhic plane, must full ashramic members be free of causal
bodies? Why or why not?
103. p. 520:
In the section on “The Logoic Plane” we learn that “the first, second,
and the third subplanes of the first cosmic ether respond specifically to the
vibration of one of the three aspects, or to those cosmic Entities Whose
influence reaches the matter of the planes from without the system altogether.” Which Entities might these be and why?
104. p. 520:
Interpret: “On the fourth
subplane comes a primary blending of the three fiery Lives, producing
archetypally that force manifestation of electricity which eventually causes
the blazing forth of the Sons of Light on the next plane”? Who are “the three fiery Lives”? Who are the “Sons of Light”?
105. p. 521:
Discuss the buddhic plane as “a plane of at-one-ment whereon an
approximation is made which, on the path of return, marks the moment of
achievement, and the point of triumph.” What
is the reason for this triumph and why should it be associated with the buddhic
plane? How is the number four associated with obscuration?
106. p. 521:
Using the Law of Correspondences, discuss the buddhic plane as the place
of triumph for man, the battle-ground for the Heavenly Man and the
burning-ground for the solar Logos. What
has a burning-ground to do with the ethers?
If the buddhic plane is the battle ground for the Heavenly Man what is
the significance of the fact that the majority of ashrams are now located upon
the buddhic plane?
107. p. 521:
Give your interpretation of the following very occult statements: “This differentiation of the subplanes of
the systemic planes into a higher three,
a lower three, and a central plane of harmony is only so from the standpoint of
electrical phenomena, and not from the standpoint of either pure Spirit, or
pure substance, viewed apart from each other. It concerns the mystery of
electricity, and the production of light.”
108. p. 521: In your own words, seek to shed light upon
the following: “ ... to the occultist
there is no such thing as substance, but only Force in varying degrees, only
Energy of differentiated quality, only Lives emanating from different sources,
each distinctive and apart, and only Consciousness producing intelligent effect
through the medium of space.”
109. p. 521:
Who is “Lord Agni”? What are the
implications of the fact that He “shows forth His fiery life on the atomic
subplane of each plane; He shows forth as solar fire on the second, third and
fourth, and as ‘fire by friction’ on the fifth, sixth and seventh”? How does this disposition of forces relate
Lord Agni to the Solar Logos?
110. pp. 521-522: Note that man shows forth as solar fire on
the “third, fourth and the three higher subplanes of the fifth plane”. What hints about the nature and value of the
Spiritual Triad are hereby conveyed? How,
do you suppose, the Heavenly Man shows forth?
111. p. 522:
What may be the implications of the idea that on every plane we have the division 3—1—3? (Electric Fire, Solar Fire, Fire by
Friction).
112. p. 522:
Enlarge upon the idea that thought to the Heavenly Men the ashrams of
the Masters may be vital to the solar
Logos these same ashrams may be considered as material.
113. p. 522:
Explain how it is that the number four
in relation to the planes may usually be considered solar.
114. p. 522: Discuss the unique place of the fourth
subplane of the systemic mental plane? What
is accomplished upon this plane and in what ways may it be related to the
buddhic plane?
115. p. 522:
In relation to our solar Logos and solar system, Who or What is “Brahma”? What are the “forty-nine fires of matter” or
of Brahma? What are the implications of
the ways that the Spirit, Soul and Substance Aspects of Brahma functions on
the forty-nine systemic planes?
116. p. 523:
Discuss the manner in which the second aspect of the logoic Trinity
functions. Compare the division of
planes through which Brahma functions with the division through which Vishnu
functions. What do you learn from this
comparison? Who is more advanced, Brahma
or Vishnu? Who is more influential in
the solar system—Brahma or Vishnu? Why
do you say so? In what ways is Brahma’s
influence more pervasive and less localized?
What are the implications that each of the “three Persons of the Trinity”
has three aspects focussed through different groupings of subplanes?
117. p. 523:
What are the Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva aspects of the human Monad? In what way is each aspect threefold and upon
what planes do these aspects manifest?
118. p. 523:
Give your interpretation of the following: “Brahma is the positive life of matter; He is
the revelation of substance and the blaze that can be seen.”
119. p. 523:
Why does the Tibetan treat the manifestation of Brahma in terms of “The Planes” and the manifestation of
Vishnu or the second divine Aspect in terms of “Vibration”?
120. p. 523:
What thoughts come to you as you realize that seven words represent the
second aspect of divinity? What are “vibrations
of consciousness” in this context? What
might be the meaning of “the major three words which are the sumtotal of egoic
life”? What are the solar systemic
implications of the fact that “the chord of at-one-ment ... is that which is
sounding forth now”?
121. p. 523:
What does it meant that “the three aspects of Spirit as they are seen
can only be expressed in terms of the other two in this solar system”?
122. p. 523:
Is all that is of a ninefold
or a sevenfold nature?
123. p. 524:
What, in the light of the foregoing anent Brahma, would it mean to study
the substance aspect in its triple nature?
124. p. 524:
What is the one aspect of electricity which is at present utilized by
man? Why is this presently utilized
aspect called “the negative electricity of the planet”?
125. p. 524:
Give your interpretation of the following: “When man has found out how to contact and
utilise positive solar electricity, we shall have a very dangerous condition brought
about, and one of the factors which will eventually manifest in the destruction
of the fifth root race by fire.” Why, do
you think, will the situation be so dangerous?
Do you think that the term electricity can be applied in some manner to all the fires of the cosmic physical
plane? What thoughts come to you when
you read that the fifth rootrace will be destroyed by fire? Can you speculate what the nature of this
destruction by fire will be? Review the
references which refer to the wide-spread destruction of the forms of
animal-man at the time of individualization.
126. p. 524:
What, do you anticipate, will be the nature of the great liberation and
purification to occur in the fifth round?
What do we learn anent group progress by realizing that in the fifth
round humanity must be purified of “elements which would tend to hinder the
evolutionary progress”?
127. p. 524:
What do you think the Tibetan means when he mentions “harmonious man”? Discuss “harmonious man” in terms of the
relationship between the various human principles.
128. p. 524:
In light of the discussion anent the various aspects of substance and
consciousness, in what way does the six-pointed star describe the evolutionary
goal of modern man?
129. p. 524:
What is the threefold essential nature of the soul aspect? What might be the “three magnetic groups”
which the Tibetan discusses in this section?
130. p. 525:
It is often said that humanity is preparing to take the first initiation. And yet, on this page, the widespread
preparation for the first initiation is discussed only as a fairly distant
eventuality, “in due course of time”? How
can we reconcile these two points of view?
131. p. 525:
Speculate upon the modus operandi of the following process which will
occur in the fifth round: “The KNOWERS
and the students of
Knowledge—actuated by group consciousness and working consciously—will
separate themselves in group formation from
those who know not, and from those who care not.” What role has the fifth ray in inducing and
encouraging this process?
132. p. 525:
Discuss the Law of Cleavage and its positive and negative effects?
133. p. 525:
We learn of the Judgment to occur in the fifth round that “it will mark
primarily the line of demarcation between the lower four Rays of consciousness
and the higher three.” What might this
mean and why might this be so? Elucidate
the following anent the Judgment: “It is
also a mystery hid in the relationship between the four exoteric Kumaras, and
the esoteric three, and from the point of view of man separate those who are
developing the consciousness of the Triad from those who as yet are living the
life of the Quaternary.” Is Sanat
Kumara included among the three esoteric Kumaras? What of the Buddhas of Activity? Is there a fundamental relationship between
the four Rays of Attribute and the quaternary, and the three Rays of Aspect and
the Triad? If so, of what nature?
134. p. 525:
Discuss the relative strength of the lunar Lords in the fourth and fifth
rounds.
135. p. 525:
What is the meaning of the word “cavern” as here used? How is the cavern different from the “cave of
initiation”?
136. p. 525:
Have you any slightest inkling of the nature of the “three aspects of
Spirit”? Is there any way to associate
these three aspects with the three aspects of the Will?
137. p. 526:
Give your interpretation of the following from the Old Commentary: “The Blessed
Ones hide Their threefold nature, but reveal Their triple essence by means of
the three great groups of atoms. Three
are the atoms, and threefold the radiation.
The inner core of fire hides itself and is known only through radiation
and that which radiates. Only after the
blaze dies out and the heat is no longer felt can the fire be known.” Who, in this case, are the “Blessed Ones”? How are they different from the Blessed Ones
Who appear in Esoteric Psychology, Vol. II? What are the “three great groups of atoms”? What is the meaning of the “inner core of
fire”?
138. p. 526:
What is the gist of D.K.’s explanation of why the mental unit has four
spirillae instead of seven?
139. p. 526:
During man’s transference from the human kingdom into the spiritual
kingdom, describe how you think the following takes place: “His polarisation shifts from out of the
lower three atoms into the Triadal atoms; the force which these atoms generate
and embody is merged and blended into the higher force points.” Is this a process which is meaningful to you? What evidences of it have you seen in your
own life and in the lives of those around you?
140. p. 527:
On the top of this page is one of the best and most concise descriptions
of the nature of the permanent atom. Read
it carefully and then offer what you learn.
What is “germ substance”? Why
does the permanent atom emanate from the second aspect of the Monad? What is
the second aspect of the Monad? What
are the implications of this? We learn
that the permanent atom is a representative of the “feminine aspect of the
second Person”. What does this mean and
what are its implications?
141. p. 527:
Give your interpretation of the following anent the spirillae: “The spirillae therefore are but streams of
force, or second aspect vitality which circulate geometrically within the
circumscribing wall of substance, composed of third aspect force or substance”.
142. p. 527:
The following sentences are to be seriously pondered. What does your pondering yield?: “The primordial ray is the vehicle of the
divine Ray” “Negative force forms a
receptacle for positive force. Atoms are but force centres, and the centres as
we know of them are but aggregates of force points which have reached a specific
point in evolution, and are responding to the first great aspect in some
degree, or to electric fire”. What
is a “force point”? What is the
magnitude of a force point compared to a physical plane atom? Do “force points” evolve or only atoms? Are these ultimate
and non-ultimate force points? Discuss an atom as an aggregate of force
points. Why must the first great aspect
or electric fire be involved in the manifestation of an atom? Consider Babbitt’s atom and indicate in the
diagram the point of impact of the first aspect.
143. p 527:
The Tibetan tells us of the importance of the above italicized section. He tells us that “it contains the secret of
the position of the different kingdoms of nature within the logoic body, and
their place and part, for all depends upon the type of force which animates,
upon the interplay of that force in substance, upon the dual, triple, or united
aspect of force, and upon its septenary demonstration in form-building”. From your reading, did you gather any of the
above? If so, what?
144. p. 527:
What cosmic Entity “is to the
Logos the negative aspect of electricity”?
145. pp. 528-529: Give your interpretation of the following: “Every form and aggregate of atoms, is simply
a force centre produced by the action of positive force and its interaction
with negative energy. It is the vitality
of the second aspect working in conjunction with the third, and producing—in
time and space—that illusion or maya which temporarily blazes forth, and
attracts attention, creating the impression that matter is a concrete something. There is no such thing as concretion in
reality; there is only force of different kinds, and the effect produced on consciousness by their interplay.” Why are these statements so important to
occultists? Why are they important to
you? Discuss concretion as an effect upon
consciousness of the interplay of forces.
146. p. 528:
What is “Divine Ideation”? Interpret: “Impulse is spirit energy causing
objectivity.”
147. p. 528:
Discuss the relationship between the three things which are required
before any form of energy can become objective—Privation, Form and Matter.
148. p. 528:
Elucidate: “Force of life is the
transformation into energy of the thought of the Logos”.
149. p. 528:
What does it mean that “spirit has to acquire full self-consciousness”? Can it be said that spirit lacks knowledge of
limitation?
150. p. 528:
In what way can it be accurately said that “the devas are the origin of
form”? Distinguish practically between
the Ahi and the Army of the Voice. Relate
these two groups to the four higher systemic planes and the three lower.
151. p. 528:
Discuss form as the principle of limitation.
152. p. 528:
What is the form which combines all forms? Discuss this in reference to the Bhagavad Gita.
153. p. 529: Discuss the relation of the first aspect of
divinity to the principle of harmony. Discuss
the appropriateness of the following names for the “third type of force”
which, presumably, is first aspect force:
a) The one synthesising Life; b) Electric fire; c) The point of
equilibrium; d) Unity or harmony; e) Pure Spirit; f) Dynamic Will; g) Existence. Note the order in which they are presented. Does this order connect at all to the seven
Rays? If so, howso? Why is it said that this third type of force “is
itself on its own plane the sumtotal of the second”?
154. p. 529:
FOHAT is discussed here. Does FOHAT refer to a triple Force behind matter,
form and spirit, or does FOHAT refer the to the “third type of force”? Asked in another way, on the cosmic physical
plane, are all three aspects of divinity really aspects of FOHAT? Why
yes or no?
155. p. 529:
What are the implications of the idea that “each of the streams of force
in the permanent atoms vibrates to the note of a particular subplane ... ”
156. p. 529:
What does the Tibetan mean that “from the point of view of the
microcosm, the aspect of pure Spirit or of Electric Fire remains in the solar
system as an abstraction”? If the true
nature of Spirit remains unrevealed in this mahamanvantara, what, then, in
relation to Spirit is revealed?
157. p. 530:
Which, of the entire range of vibrations, are missing from the response
capabilities of the mental unit?
158. p. 530:
What inferences can you draw from the following: “From the standpoint of the average man in
physical incarnation, the egoic consciousness, within the causal periphery, is
as abstract as is the Logos viewed as the Dweller within the system”? Is this promising?
159. p. 530:
What are the implications of the fact that the solar Logos is turning
His attention away from the two and one
half systemic planes which we know as the three world of human evolution? To what degree is the solar Logos conscious of these worlds?
160. p. 530:
What thoughts come to you as you read that “the four lower spirillae are
definitely under the influence of the personality Ray”?
161. p. 530:
While it is easy to see why the fifth spirilla should be under the
influence of the Egoic Ray, why should the sixth spirillae be so also?
162. p. 530:
If the fifth spirilla vibrates to five types of force, to how many types
of force do all spirillae within a full permanent atom vibrate? Why? In
light of these numbers, why may we expect the perfection of the Brahma Aspect
in the fifth round? How is the fifth
spirilla related to entrance into the Kingdom of God?
163. p. 531:
The following is profoundly occult.
See if you can grasp its meaning and some of its implications and
ramifications: “The spirillae are
literally ten in number, three major and seven minor. But from the unit point of view, they are the
four and the major three, the remaining lesser three being counted as one with
their major, inasmuch as they are direct reflections.” From these sentences, what of potential value
do you learn about our planetary system—sacred, non-sacred and synthesizing
planets? What do you learn about the
seven colors? What might you learn about
the system of schemes, chains and globes?
What might you learn about the sevenfoldness or tenfoldness of the
planes of manifestation?
164. p. 531:
Why should the following be necessary:
“The arrangement of these tiny force vortices and their internal economy
on each plane is one of the secrets of initiation and may not be revealed”?
165. p. 531:
Give your impression of the implications of the following hints: “The astral permanent atom has its internal
streams of force arranged so that the spirals do approach quite closely the
conformation of a heart, through the pointed end is eliminated. The buddhic permanent atom has its spirillae
arranged so as to form approximately a figure eight with a central stream bisecting
the double spiral.” Why the appropriateness
of the heart? Why the appropriateness of
the figure eight? In what other occult
structures or energy movements does the figure eight appear and how could you
link these appearances to the geometry within the buddhic permanent atom?
166. p. 532:
What implications suggest themselves to you as you realize that the
higher three permanent atoms “contain but three spirillae—the major three”. Is this an elimination of four or seven,
considering that the lower permanent atoms have, literally, ten spirillae?
167. p. 532:
When a man becomes a pentagram instead of a six-pointed star, how many
permanent atoms will he have? Which and
why? At what point does a man become a
triangle?
168. p. 532:
Can the lower two permanent atoms (with the mental unit) be retained
after the fourth initiation? Is such
retention either necessary or possible?
169. p. 532:
What thoughts come to you when you read that: “The mystery of a planet and its central life
has not yet been revealed. It is connected
with another manifestation of which as yet nought is known.”
170. p. 532:
What is the particular meaning which the Tibetan gives to the adjective “extra-systemic”
in point number nine?
171. p. 532:
The implications of the following are great. What is suggested to your thought: “The causal body of the Heavenly Men is upon
the third subplane of the comic mental plane, while that of the solar Logos and
those of the three Persons of the logoic Trinity are upon the first subplane.” What anent the initiatory status of these
great Beings is herein revealed? Us the
Law of Analogy. Are the three Persons of
the logoic Trinity planetary? What might
it mean that They are not solar but are super-planetary? Consult p. 99 of Esoteric Psychology, Vol.
II.
Do you think the three Persons of the logoic Trinity are related
exclusively to the three synthesizing planets?
172. p. 532:
Point 11 is profoundly provocative and difficult to decipher. What thoughts come to you as you ponder it? What possible relation between man and
mineral emerges from this paragraph? Remember
that men are to become “living stones”. Try
to shed light on the following: “There
is, therefore, a close analogy between these focal points of force of the
group—human or otherwise—and a chain, a globe, and a round ... ”. Remember the progression of life from kingdom
to kingdom with the onset of each round.
Who or What might be the solar entities and lunar entities discussed? Consult p. 844 for possible indications. Within what kind of centre might “the sumtotal
of the permanent atoms of man in the
spiritual kingdom (the three triadal atoms, atma-buddhi-manas) form the
spiral streams of force ... ”?
173. p. 532:
Consider the following: “The
permanent atoms concern solar entities when they are found on or above the
higher mental. They concern lunar
entities on the lower mental, the astral and the physical plane.” How many different types of solar entities
can you think of? Of these which type is
most likely to be a center in which all the higher permanent atoms of man form
spirillae?
174. p. 532:
It is fairly easy to conceive of chakras within chakras within chakras
as wheels within wheels within wheels, etc.
Can you explain a similar structure demonstrating permanent atoms within
permanent atoms within permanent atoms, etc., with the lesser permanent atoms
serving as streams of force or spirillae to the greater permanent atoms?
175. p. 533:
Often the terms “scheme” and “chain” are used interchangeably by the
Tibetan. What, in the section under
Roman numeral I, tells you that schemes and chains are fundamentally different?
176. p. 533:
What type of being uses only one permanent atom within the solar system, i.e., upon the cosmic physical plane? From the tabulation, what do you learn about
the status of these beings?
177. p. 533:
What significance do you gather when you realize that the solar Logos;
Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva; the three synthesizing planets; and the seven sacred
planets number together fourteen? If the
five presently acknowledged non-sacred planets are added, the sum comes to
nineteen, which sums to ten and then one.
What do you think?
178. p. 533:
What, in your estimation, is the function of a Lord of a globe in a
chain? What do you think may be the
status of a Lord of a globe compared, for instance, to Sanat Kumara or the
Buddhas of Activity? Why do you say so?
179. p. 533:
What is a “Root Manu” and what is its function?
180. p. 533:
What is suggested to your thought by the fact that there are
seventy-seven Embodiers of form? How
would these beings be related to the various Manus? Why related to various Manus?
181. p. 533:
How can the bodies of certain Entities be “made up of animal souls”? What, in this case, are “animal souls”? In what way might “Triads” be involved in
this process? Why should there be seven such Entities? Are these Entities all found within the Earth
Scheme or are They distributed among various schemes?
182. p. 533:
How does point 2 in tabulation III support the relationship of Mercury
to the number five?
183. pp. 533-534: From reading tabulation IV, what new
information do you gather about the nature and status of the “seven Sons of
Fohat”? Should the seven Sons here
discussed be considered cosmic or systemic?
Why?
184. p. 534:
We read in tabulation IV of “that Entity Who works through the FORM of a
planetary occult Hierarchy, using it as His body of manifestation, and
regarding it as a centre through which all His force can flow”. In terms of the occult Hierarchy of the
planet Earth, Who or What might this Entity be?
Why?
185. p. 534:
Focus on point 4, tabulation IV. Which
constellation is the “lesser Dragon”? What
is the “sixth principle in the solar system” and why should it be associated
with Neptune? Give your interpretation
of the “Halls of Wisdom”.
186. p. 534:
Examine all six tabulations from pp. 533-535. Realizing that all entities listed are listed
in descending order of status, what
do you learn about the structure of our solar system and the entities who
manage it?
187. p. 534:
Examine all six tabulations carefully.
Can you detect any distinctive quality which distinguishes all entities
listed under each of the tabulations? For
instance, do the entities listed under tabulation IV have any quality that unites
them, or that distinguishes them particularly from the entities listed in
tabulation V?
188. p. 534:
In tabulation V., point 2, we are told of “the lesser Heavenly Men on
the buddhi level”. From this reference,
what do we learn about the use of the term “Heavenly Men”? Note that the term Heavenly Man may be
applied not only to a Regent of a chain, but perhaps, even to a Lord of a globe. Why can these lesser Heavenly Men not be considered planetary logoi of any
kind, even minor, non-sacred planetary logoi?
If it is possible that such a being as Sanat Kumara can find His place
in tabulation IV, is it possible that a Master of the Wisdom could find His
place in tabulation V? If so, why so? Or why not?
Where might that entity which is an ashram
be found?
189. p. 534:
What might be the nature of a “lesser solar Deity” the body of which is
comprised of 343 egoic vehicles? If a
single human unit can be considered a cell within a Heavenly Man, what sort of
aggregation might be considered a cell within a solar Logos?
190. pp. 533-535: From a thorough study of the six tabulations,
which are the major learnings to emerge for you? What hitherto unknown realizations have
emerged for you? What unsuspected
implications have also emerged?
191. p. 535:
What is the value to you or to intelligent humanity in general, to
realize that “many diverse lives (all embodying lesser lives, or embodied in
greater ones themselves) are to be found within the various schemes”?
192. p. 535:
From what is said about superhuman, human and subhuman lives, do you
believe that subhuman lives have permanent atoms? Why or why not?
193. p. 535:
What are the implications and ramifications of the following statements
by the Tibetan: “All the permanent atoms concern physical matter and manifestation”?
194. p. 535: What are the implications of the statement
that “the highest permanent atom of man, the atmic, is, after all, an atom of
the third cosmic ether ... ”?
195. p. 535:
Why is it justifiable to use the term personality in relation to the many beings listed in the six
tabulations?
196. p. 535:
Discuss permanent atoms as points of contact with “the force of a plane,
of a planet, of a chain, or a scheme or of a system.” Elaborate upon how these points of contact
may interplay with these different types and magnitudes of units (i.e.,
planets, chains, schemes or systems).
(End of Section 1)
1.
p. 536: Interpret:
“ ... the laws of karma are adjusted, the clue being found in the
mastery of the sixteen rays of the Ego, for which sixteen rays sixteen mantras
or words are given, the real pronunciation being however reserved for initiates
only.” Note the relation of the number
sixteen to seven. See also p. 514, where
the Rays emanating from the heart of the sphere are considered seven. Is there any way to number the contents of
the causal body such that sixteen is derived when all factors are summed? What is your solution to this problem? How can Formula II from DINA II be
connected to the sixteen rays of the Ego?
2.
p. 536: Give your interpretation of the following
occult statement: “The mystery of the
sixteen rays of the Ego will be revealed when the force of the Sacred Tetraktys
is merged with that of the Holy Twelve.”
What, do you suppose, are the “Holy Twelve”? There are a number of ways to derive the
number sixteen in relation to the Egoic Lotus.
What are some of them?
3.
p. 536: In what way can it be said that the mental
unit “embodies the first aspect in manifestation, and ... is analogous to the
first logoic aspect”? Discuss the idea
analogy that just as the first aspect of divinity cannot come into full
demonstration in our solar system, neither can the mental unit demonstrate all
the powers with which it is allied.
4.
p. 536: If the two lower permanent atoms and mental
unit of the human being are contained with the causal periphery upon the higher
mental plane, how can they also be
located upon the atomic subplane of the systemic physical and astral planes,
and the fourth subplane of the mental plane, respectively?
5.
pp. 536-537: Analyze the following and give your
interpretation: We are investigating “the
seven types of force, or the seven logoic spirillae within that permanent atom
[the physical logoic permanent atom]; this, if realised, gives a new outlook
upon the subject of plane vibration”. Discuss
the relationship between activation and awakening of the various spirillae and
the activation of the corresponding systemic planes.
6.
p. 537: If by some calculations man has ten centers
of force, how would you enumerate these ten?
7.
p. 537: What are the dynamics of obscuration, the absorption of the energy of one center by another
and greater? How might this really work? Microcosmically (i.e., within your own
system) are there presently any dynamics occurring which are analogous to the
dynamics of obscuration?
8.
p. 537: Why does the Tibetan list the three major
centers as Head, Heart and Throat? What
else might He have said in other contexts?
9.
p. 538: What justification is there for calling the
causal body the monadic heart centre?
10. p. 538: We are told that the causal body “is a
flaming wheel of fire within the monadic auric egg, which embraces the five
planes of monadic manifestation.” If the
causal body is to be found upon the higher levels of the systemic mental plane,
in what way can it be said to embrace
the five planes of monadic
manifestation? The answer to this
question is important.
11. p. 538:
Why are the innermost three petals of the causal body considered
unrevealed and embryonic?
12. p. 538:
Discuss the equivalence of petals, spokes or whorls in relation to the
causal body.
13. p. 538:
Given the meaning of the inner three petals of the egoic lotus, why
should they be especially related to and responsive to monadic vibration?
14. p. 538:
Are the nine petals completely unfolded
by the time the third initiation is reached?
15. p. 538:
We read the following: “it is the
stimulation or revelation of these inner petals, but the One Initiator at the
third and fourth Initiations which brings about the final conflagration and
blazing up of the causal body with the subsequent liberation of the central
positive Life or Fire.” Compare this
statement to one earlier made anent the two lower permanent atoms and mental
unit, to the heightened stimulation of which is also attributed the destruction
of the causal body. From what is written
here, can one gather that the inner petals are relatively unstimulated and
unrevealed before the third initiation? Is
there anything here to suggest that the process of fiery destruction has its
inception at the third degree?
16. p. 538:
Consider the following: “Solar
Fire is dual. It is the fire of matter
or substance and the fire of mind blended.”
Why does the Tibetan say this? Is
not Solar Fire something unto itself, existing before any blending with Fire by Friction? Could the Tibetan mean that Solar Fire when
manifesting through the substance of
the third aspect is dual? What do you
think?
17. p. 538: Describe the nature of two possible
six-pointed stars which could be conceived by consideration of the bottom
paragraph on p. 538.
18. p. 538:
Attempt to enumerate the nine fires which D.K. here discusses. This may be accomplished with reference to
the collection of human principles. Or is there another way to succeed in the
enumeration? What do you think? Remember that every aspect of deity (Brahma,
Vishnu or Shiva) has three sub-aspects.
19. p. 538:
Discuss the duality of the fires of mind. Whereas the fires related to higher mind are
easily conceivable, what the three fires related to lower mind? Or does the duality suggested have nothing to
do with higher and lower mind?
20. p. 538:
What is the “electric spark of [one’s] own particular Heavenly Man”? See p. 539 and draw the appropriate analogy.
21. p. 539:
Share your thoughts on the following:
The inner three [petals] which complete the twelve, and which are
concerned with the final, and essentially spiritual stages of his evolution are
really related more intimately to the evolution of the Heavenly Man, and are
connected with the stimulus which He receives in contacting the logoic electric
spark, or the pure Spirit aspect of the Logos.”
22. p. 539:
How is the term Kumara used on this page? To what sort of Entity does it refer?
23. p. 539:
Do you think the number of petals associated with the causal
manifestation of each Heavenly Man of our system varies or is regular? These Heavenly Men, seen psychically, appear
as Lotuses. Do you think this psychic
vision is focusing upon their causal appearance or some other? What references in TCF can you marshal to support your
position?
24. p. 539:
In what way does the egoic lotus unfold its petals in groups of three upon the three planes of the higher
mental? Is there any regular system to
this unfoldment as regards the location or focusing of the lotus upon the three
planes, or, really, sub planes?
25. p. 539:
What is the relation of the three lower systemic planes to the three
Halls of Ignorance, of Learning and of Wisdom?
Can one enter the Hall of Wisdom if there is no conscious contact
between the higher and lower mental planes.
Return to p. 534, tabulation IV, point 4, and use the information there
found (or hinted) to enrich your understanding of the nature of the Hall of
Wisdom. In which Hall are you presently
focussed and why?
26. p. 539:
Regarding the Petal of Knowledge for the physical plane what is the
major psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What sort of “Law” is broken and why is it
broken? What sorts of human beings have
one petal unfolded?
27. p. 539:
Regarding the Petal of Love for the physical plane what is the major
psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? How does the sort of love associated with
this petal unfold through relationships?
What sorts of human beings have two petals unfolded?
28. p. 540:
Regarding the Petal of Sacrifice for the physical plane what is the
major psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What are the “driving force of circumstances”
and how can this bring about sacrifice? What
does it mean to offer up the physical body upon the “altar of desire”? What sorts of human beings have three petals
unfolded?
29. p. 540:
What results within the three worlds of evolution can be expected when
the physical permanent atom becomes radioactive?
30. p. 540:
Why, even with the unfoldment of the first three petals, is a man
considered still to be working within the Hall of Ignorance?
31. p. 540:
Regarding the Petal of Knowledge for the astral plane what is the major
psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What does it mean to consciously balance the
pairs of opposites, especially at the stage of evolution here designated? In what manner is the Law of Attraction and
Repulsion gradually utilized? What does
it mean to begin to comprehend causes by means of one’s essential duality? What sorts of human beings have four petals
unfolded?
32. p. 540:
Regarding the Petal of Love for the astral plane, what is the major
psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? Interpret:
“unfoldment is brought about through the process of gradual transmuting
the love of the subjective nature or of the Self within”. In what way, at this stage, does the
individual seek to “turn his attention to the Love of the Real”? Why should this process work out in many live
of “turmoil, of endeavour and or failure ... ”?
What stage of aspiration, discipleship or initiation might the
unfoldment of this petal represent? What
sorts of human beings have five petals unfolded?
33. pp. 540-541: Regarding the Petal of Sacrifice for the
astral plane what is the major psychological result of the unfoldment of this
petal? What rays, planets and
astrological signs do you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this
petal and why? What is the meaning of
giving up one’s own desires for the sake of one’s group? Why, at this point of evolution, is the
sacrificial motive still “somewhat a blind one and still coloured by the desire
for a return of that which he gives and for love from those he seeks to serve”? What stage of aspiration, discipleship or
initiation might the unfoldment of this petal represent? What sorts of human beings have six petals
unfolded?
34. pp. 540-541: What results within the three worlds of
evolution can be expected when the astral permanent atom “comes into full
activity and radiance, as regards five of its spirillae”? Why, at this point, five spirillae?
35. p. 541:
Regarding the Petal of Knowledge for the mental plane, what is the major
psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What stage discipleship or initiation might
the unfoldment of this petal represent? What
psychological conditions are necessary when the man comes to the point where he
“consciously utilises all that he has gained or is gaining under the law for
the definite benefit of humanity”? What
is the relationship of such an individual to the Divine Plan? What sorts of human beings have seven petals
unfolded?
36. p. 541:
Why is each tier of petals somewhat colored by the quality of the other
two tiers?
37. p. 541:
In relation to the tier of Love Petals, why should the light of
sacrifice be weaker in tone than the other two tones or qualities? Explain the following: “On the mental plane, the light of sacrifice
comes to its full display, and all that is seen is coloured by that light.” What are some reasons why sacrifice is so
closely related to the mental plane?
38. pp. 541-542: Regarding the Petal of Love for the mental
plane what is the major psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What sorts of human beings have eight petals
unfolded? What stage discipleship or
initiation might the unfoldment of this petal represent? What sorts of qualities are necessarily
present in an individual capable of and determined to carry forward a “conscious
steady application of all the powers of the soul to the service of humanity
within no thought of return nor any desire for reward for the immense sacrifice
involved”?
39. p. 542:
Regarding the Petal of Sacrifice for the mental plane what is the major
psychological result of the unfoldment of this petal? What rays, planets and astrological signs do
you believe might contribute to the unfoldment of this petal and why? What sorts of human beings have nine petals
unfolded? What stage discipleship or
initiation might the unfoldment of this petal represent? Interpret the following: The unfoldment of the ninth petal “demonstrates
as the predominant bias of the soul as seen in a series of many lives spent by
the initiate prior to his final emancipation.
He becomes in his sphere the ‘Great Sacrifice’”. What is meant by the “predominant bias of the
soul”? What, in this case, is the
meaning of the “final emancipation”? Is
the Tibetan suggesting that the unfoldment of this petal necessitates many
lives of endeavor, or that the unfoldment of this petal demonstrates the fulfillment of the predominant bias of
the soul which has been evident during many previous lives of endeavor?
40. p. 542:
Is D.K. suggesting full unfoldment of all three petals in each tier is
consummated at the time of the unfoldment of the last petal in the tier? If this is so, what does one learn from the
dynamics of the process?
41. p. 542:
Examine the following sentence carefully: After the ninth petal has been unfolded, “the
causal body is then (expressed in terms of fire ) a blazing centre of heat,
radiating to its group warmth and vitality.”
What is the meaning of the group emphasis?
42. p. 542:
What might be the meaning of the fourth dimensional rotation of the
spokes of the causal wheel after the third initiation? Imagine the wheels turning upon themselves. What sort of understanding (especially
with respect to past, present and future does this kind of turning suggest?
43. p. 542:
The following thought is extremely occult. What ideas come to you as you attempt to
interpret it?: In the midst [of the
forth dimensional rotation of the spokes within the causal body] forming a
certain geometrical triangle (differing according to the ray of the Monad) can
be seen three points of fire, or the permanent atoms and the mental unit, in all
their glory.” Assuming here three principal monadic rays, what sorts of
triangle do you think would be seen in relation to each type of monadic ray and
why? Refer to p. 89 of Esoteric
Astrology, anent the ray which
issues from the many-petalled lotus. Do
you think that this ray is the monadic ray or the egoic ray?
44. pp. 542-543: Share your thoughts anent the following
occult statements: “Then the fire of matter, of ‘fire by friction’, becomes sufficiently
intense; when the fire of mind of solar fire (which vitalises the nine petals)
becomes equally fierce, and when the electric spark at the innermost centre
blazes out and can be seen, the entire causal body becomes radioactive.” Is solar fire seen only in relation to
the nine petals and not
to the inmost three? This series of sentences seems to suggest
that all three fires contribute rather equally to the destruction of the causal
vehicle, does it not?
45. p. 543:
The vitality of the permanent atoms are only, it seems, temporarily contained within the atomic
spheres. To what “great sphere” does
that vitality return? We are told that
at the liberation “the fire of mind blends with its emanating source, and the
central life escapes”. What, in your
opinion, is that “emanating source”? What
is actually going on in this process with respect to the fire of mind?
46. p. 543:
At what point does participation in the Hall of Wisdom terminate and
become something higher? Remember that
Neptunian lives which dispense Love-Wisdom within certain of the Halls of
Wisdom.
47. p. 543:
A very important series of sentences here occurs giving an idea of how
long it takes for the various tiers of petals to open, and the initiation with
which the unfoldment of these tiers is connected. The unfoldment of the first tier “involves a
process covering a vast period of time.” “Then the second series of petals are opened,
during a period of time covering his participation intelligently in world
affairs until he enters the spiritual kingdom at the first Initiation; and a
final and briefer period wherein the three higher or inner ring of petals are
developed and opened.” From these words,
it appears that the first second and third initiations would be rather closely
correlated with the opening of the seventh, eighth and ninth petals
respectively? Does this thought seem
correct to you? Why or why not? If correct, what sorts of developments could
be expected with the opening of the fifth and sixth petals? Where, particularly, would the aspirant be found? Where the true disciple?
48. p. 543:
Discuss the following: “ ... the
order of the development of the petals and the stimulation of the fires depends
upon the Ray of the Monad, and the subray upon which the causal body finds
itself. This thought would be expansion,
and would prove a fruitful source of study to the occult investigator.” How would you expand this thought? Why is the Ray of the Monad so important in
the order of unfoldment, not only of the petals of the egoic lotus but of the
chakras in the etheric body? What is the
“subray” here referred to? Is it the ray
of the causal body considered as a subray of the monadic ray? If so, why would this ray also be important
in the order of unfoldment? What ideas
to you have about the order in which petals unfold according to monadic ray and
the subray upon which the causal body is found?
49. p. 543:
In what way does consciousness contribute to rapidity of unfoldment?
50. p. 543:
What are the important implications of the following statement? “The Ego takes no active interest in the
development until the second petal in the second series is beginning to open”. What, do you suppose, is the reason for the
Ego’s (i.e., Solar Angel’s) lack of interest before this time?
51. p. 544:
What is the second Logos? Why or
how is the “inherent life of the second Logos ... the life of the petals of the
lotus”? What is the first Logos? What does it mean that the first Logos works
through the SELF? Why does the first Logos only respond at the
point of the opening of the fifth petal?
Can you think of any important astrological or numerological
correspondences in this relationship?
52. p. 544:
What degree of petal unfoldment indicates that the “causal body is in a
condition to respond to the Will aspect of the Heavenly Man ... ”?
53. p. 544:
In the foregoing pages, the Tibetan has said that He has given
information, which “if followed, will lead the student to much of practical
value and application”. As you read pp. 536-544,
what information do you consider the most practical and how would you apply
it?
54. p. 544:
How can you best define an elemental? What, specifically, is an elemental of the
mental plane?
55. p. 545:
As clearly as you can, how would you explain the nature of spirillae?
56. p. 545:
Discuss the following: “The
internal life of the permanent atom, and that which animates it, is the life of
the third aspect; the force playing upon it and through it is the life of the
second aspect”. How, specifically in
relation to the permanent atoms, do the influences of these aspects of divinity
differ?
57. p. 545:
What thoughts come to you as you ponder the following summary statement: “ ... the
permanent atoms are concerned with the substance aspect of Existence or
Becoming, while the petals or the lotus, or the fiery spokes of the wheel, deal
specifically with the psychical aspect, or the development of consciousness;
the central nucleus, or the three inner petals, embodies the aspect of pure
Spirit.”
58. p. 545: We learn that all three aspects of divinity
have a reflex action upon each other.
Describe how, in terms of Will, Love and Activity, the nature of this
reflex action, this mutual stimulation and interplay?
59. p. 545:
The following, touches on the importance of the permanent atoms to the Ego: “It is ... through the permanent atoms that
the Ego comes en rapport with his objective world; he works upon and through
his environment successfully or blindly just in so far as he can energise his
permanent atoms, and bring the spirillae out of latency into potency. This only becomes possible as he unfolds the
petals of the lotus”. In your own words,
what is the process here being described?
What is the relationship between the unfolding petals of the egoic lotus
and the awakening of the spirillae?
60. p. 546:
The unfoldment of all three petals in the Knowledge Tier and the Love
Tier result respectively in the strong stimulation of the three major spirillae
of the physical and astral permanent atoms respectively. However, we learn, that “in the case of the
mental unit ... the four spirillae of the mental unit are aroused to full
activity when the knowledge petal of
the final three opens”. What, then, do
we learn about the condition of the individual at the time of the complete
opening of the seventh petal? If this
petal is associated with the first initiation, what does that tell us about the
requirement of the first initiation? Refer
to p. 541.
61. p. 546:
We learn that “the opening of the remaining two [petals of the Sacrifice
Tier] reveal the flowing threefold flower which lies at the centre of egoic
manifestation.” What are the qualities
of this threefold flower? Why is it
appropriate that the synthesis petals be revealed at the time of this
unfoldment? What has this unfoldment and
revelation to do with the building of the antahkarana?
62. p. 546:
Why does D.K. sound a note of warning in connection with the question of
egoic unfoldment?
63. p. 546:
Consider carefully: “ ... if the
Ray of the Monad is the second Ray, the knowledge petal will be the first to
open, but the second petal of love will almost parallel its development, being
for that particular type of Ego the line of easiest unfoldment; the knowledge
petal will be for it the most difficult to open.” Is there anything unusual in these statement? Why is the knowledge petal referred to in the
singular? Is D.K. calling the entire
first tier of petals the knowledge petal and
the second tier of petals the love petal? Or is He speaking of the knowledge petal in
each of the three tiers? Notice too,
that the Ray of the Monad is here discussed as the major influencing factor,
but then He uses the word “Ego”. What
does this mean to you? When D.K. says
that for the second Ray Monad the knowledge petal is the most difficult to
open, why? Does He mean that (for that
ray type of Monad) that the individual knowledge petal of all three tiers is
the most difficult (of the petals in that tier) to open? Consider what is said of the Monad upon the
second Ray, and suggest how petal unfoldment might proceed for those who have
the third or first Rays as monadic Rays (counting the fourth, fifth, sixth and
seventh ray monads as affiliated principally with the third ray).
64. p. 546:
In your own words explain D.K.’s explanation for “the greater rapidity
of the later stages of unfoldment as compared with the first”. Does His explanation make sense to you?
65. pp. 546-547: Discuss the problem of uneven petal
unfoldment. How does it work? Give some hypothetical examples. Do you know of anyone who suffers from such
uneven unfoldment? What is the apparent
result? Do you, yourself, have in some
measure this condition? If you say so,
why do you say so? Note that the Tibetan
says, “this is the explanation frequently of the power in service along certain
lines displayed by some, coupled with a comparatively low stage of development
or of consciousness (egoically speaking).
What does He mean by this? Can a
Mozart be somewhat explained in this way?
What about “Idiot Savants”, or do you think such a phenomenon is
different? How do you think such uneven
development comes about? What are some
possible scenarios?
66. p. 547:
What alternatives lay before an ego which has developed unevenly? What courses of action would be advisable to
take? How might the results of such actions
be experienced within the personality?
67. p. 547:
Review the Tibetan’s explanation of the possible genesis of uneven egoic
petal development. What thoughts come to
you in relation to these possibilities? What
might the Tibetan mean by “the karma of the Monad itself on its high plane.” What, in terms of antecedent experience,
might such karma suggest? We know,
theoretically, somewhat about the grip of the ego upon the personality. Of what nature might be the grip of the Monad
upon the ego? What role might
personality decision play in the case of uneven development? Think of the condition of a number of fifth
ray types in relation to the second petal—i.e., think of the Primary Lotuses. Do you think that such a condition might be
one of those which the Tibetan refers to as “certain peculiar conditions hidden
in the evolution of any particular Lord of a Ray”? What is a “congery of causal bodies” and how
might such a congery be subject to group karma?
Offer a scenario.
68. p. 547:
Why do you believe the Tibetan states that “the whole subject [of egoic
evolution] is of interest in that it is the next step ahead for the students of
occult psychology”? Why, the next step?
69. p. 547:
What do you think group karma is? What can you say to clarify the idea of the
karma of an egoic group? In relation to
the egoic group with which you feel yourself affiliated, do you sense any such
karma?
70. p. 548:
The Tibetan offers certain ideas here about a truly “occult psychology”. What are the most important things you would
say about “the arousing of the Ego to full activity in manifestation”? What can you share about “the sound
formulation of the laws of egoic unfoldment, of the methods whereby, petal by
petal, the lotus may be brought to perfection ... ”?
71. p. 548:
What does D.K. mean by “energy in its dual aspect—internal vibration and
external radiation”?
72. p. 548:
If the truly advanced student were to center his attention upon “the
psychical centres, such as the Ego in the causal body and egoic groups” what
would result? What would be the result
in your life”?
73. p. 548:
The Tibetan talks about the “effect of one consciousness upon another
consciousness on the physical plane” and how knowledge of this can be “scientifically
utilised to produce specific results in group evolution ... ”. Given your present knowledge, what sort of
thing do you think He has in mind?
74. p. 548:
How is “the study of vocational education, business efficiency, and the
place of the human unit in any trade or enterprise” related to the interplay of
fires and of different types of consciousnesses? What will continued attention to such
practical matters eventually reveal?
75. p. 549:
Discuss D.K.’s prophecy with respect to future training of the young. What are some specific advantages to human
living to be derived from more easy and direct access to the energy of the
higher self?
76. 549:
Give your explanation of the following warning by the Tibetan: “Such a process must necessarily be slow. The powers of the ego are stupendous and if
released now through the agency of an unready personality would lead to dire
disaster.” We are talking here about the
ego which all students of occultism are attempting to contact and integrate
with. We are not specifically talking
about kundalini or the power of the spirit and will aspect. Therefore, what sorts of dire disaster could
the Tibetan mean?
(end of Section 2)
1.
p.
550: How is it that the study of thought
elementals and fire elementals “definitely concerns the evolution of man and
his power eventually to create ...”?
2.
p. 551: What actually is a Thought-Form?
3.
p. 552: The Tibetan offers three functions for every
thought form: 1) To respond to
vibration; 2) To provide a body for an idea; 3) To carry out specific purpose. Discuss the meaning of each of these
functions according to your understanding.
4.
p. 552: The Tibetan speaks often of the Logos (the
solar Logos). Do you believe that He is
basing what He has to say upon a study of the physical manifestation of the
Logos—the logoic “quality, psychic nature, aroma, emanation or magnetism ... ” as
seen working out through form?
5.
p. 552: Discuss the object of human evolution as a
process which enables “the Thinker to respond to every contact fully and
consciously, and thus to utilise his material sheath, or sheaths, as adequate
transmitter of such contact”. Who, in
this case, is “the Thinker”?
6.
p. 552: The Tibetan states that “the most easily
studied human thought-form is the one the Ego creates through which to function”? What does the Tibetan mean by this? Is He justified, in this instance, in the use
of the term “thought-form”?
7.
p. 552: D.K. says of the solar Logos, that “He builds
by the power of his thought a body which can respond to that group of
vibrations which are concerned with the cosmic physical plane (the only one we
can study). It is not yet adequate, and
does not fully express the logoic Thinker”.
Why is it not yet adequate? When
can it be expected to be adequate? What
are the results of the fact that it is not yet
adequate?
8.
pp. 552-553: Consider carefully the vibrations to which
the systemic thought-form must respond. What
is the logoic ring-pass-not? Should it
be considered related to the cosmic physical plane alone, or to higher planes? How do you think the vibrations of the cosmic
astral plane affect the physical form of divine manifestation? Does it seem arresting to you that D.K. speaks of “the emotional quality of
other cosmic entities ... ”? What might
the Tibetan mean by “the logoic Higher Self”?
Can you think of any constellations which might be particularly
associated with the solar logoic Higher Self?
When D.K. speaks of the vibrations from Sirius, do you think He is
speaking of vibrations from the lower four subplanes of the cosmic mental plane
or of the higher three subplanes? Why? Upon what cosmic level can the Rishis of the
Great Bear be found? What does their
being found on such a level mean? Which
two stars are the “Prototypes of the Lords of the seventh and fifth Rays”? Why are these two Rays so important to the
solar Logos? How is the seventh Ray work
of thought-form building different
from the fifth Ray work of concretion?
9.
p. 553: In point 6, we learn that the systemic
thought-form must become responsive to “certain very remote vibrations, as yet
no more appreciable in the logoic Body than is monadic influence in that of
average man, from the ONE ABOUT WHOM
NAUGHT
MAY BE SAID, that cosmic
Existence Who is expressing Himself through seven centres of force, of which
our solar system is one.” Do you see any
occult blinds in the foregoing statement?
This OAWNMBS cannot
be Sirius, for Sirius is previously mentioned in point 4. And yet our solar Logos is too small a being
to be one of the major seven centers
in the OAWNMBS
greater than the Sirian Logos. What is
going on? Focus particularly on the
phrase—“seven centres of force, of which our solar system is one” and give an
alternative interpretation.
10. p. 554:
In relation to the Logos, what might “Divine Maturity” mean? When speaking of the “polar opposite” of our
Logos, why is the word “constellation” used instead of “solar system”. Would it not be reasonable to suspect that
the polar opposite of our solar Logos would be another solar Logos? What thought do you have about Who or What
might be the entity which is the polar opposite of our solar Logos? Do you think that polar opposite should be
near or far (astronomically) from our solar system? Why?
11. p. 553:
Consider the importance of the seventh and fifth rays to the magician? Why are these two rays so important? Considering this, what can be predicted anent
the quality of magic in the Aquarian Age?
What direction do you think it will take?
12. p. 554:
As you consider the various influences to which the systemic
thought-form must, in time, become responsive, what thoughts come to you? The Tibetan speaks of vibrations of various
orders. Do you detect any pattern in the
numerical listing of the seven vibrations to which the logoic thought-form must
become responsive? To which, if any, of
these vibrations are you or your group consciously responsive?
13. p. 554:
The Tibetan sometimes speaks of solar systems of various orders—for instance: our solar Logos is a fourth order Logos; the Logos of Betelgeuse is a second order Logos. Perhaps there are other references as well,
for instance, to Sirius. Do you think
that any hints regarding this ordering can
be found in the seven orders listed on pp. 553-554? If so, why?
If not, why not?
14. p. 554:
Our Logos is said to respond to vibrations of the first, second, third
and fourth order quite fully at this time, though response is not the guarantee
of utilization? Does this pattern of
response tell us anything about the degree of His development, or the
unfoldment of the logoic spirillae? What
do you conjecture, as more than conjecture is not possible? Is it fair to say that vibrations of the
fifth order are next to be mastered by Him?
How does this correspond to the work of our particular Heavenly Man and
to the work of the higher bra[hma? - check w/ MDR]?
15. p. 554:
For our solar Logos, vibrations of the fifth order emanate from the
seven Rishis of the Great Bear. Our
solar Logos merely recognizes these vibrations (in only three of His centers
[which, do you suppose]) though He cannot control these energies. If such is the nature of His response, what
might be considered the response of the seven Heavenly Men for Whom the Seven
Rishis are the prototypes? What can the
human family do to appropriate the influence of the Seven Rishis? Discuss the difference between direct and mediated
influence of the Rishis. What, do you
suppose, are the agencies of mediation?
16. p. 554:
A bit of mystery. If the ONE
ABOUT WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID has our solar Logos for His heart center
(as is sometimes indicated, probably in an occult blind) why cannot our solar
Logos sense His influence, for D.K. says that for our solar Logos, the OAWNMBS
is “sensed, and felt, but so
remotely as to be almost outside the range of His consciousness”? Certainly a heart center would be more
sensitive. By analogy, the heart center
of man is certainly sensitive to the soul of man. What, then, is an explanation.
17. p. 554:
The Tibetan tells us much about the systemic thought-form of the solar
Logos, then says, “in carrying out these ideas in connection with man and the
thought forms which he fabricates (such as his material sheaths) the
correspondence can be worked out within the system, and from the point of view
of the planetary schemes in which man has his place.” Consider, then, what D.K. has said of the
solar Logos, then apply some of the same considerations to man. What might be some of the correspondences to
the seven orders when one considers a
human being?
18. p. 555:
Consider the three methods of bringing about or enhancing vibratory
response: 1) Through the factor of time
in evolution; 2) Through extra-systemic stimulation and intensive training,
whether for a Logos or a man; 3) Through the process of Initiation and the
application of the Rod of Initiation. Discuss
the importance of the group idea in “extra-systemic stimulation”. As regards initiations, what is the
difference between “the great initiations and ... the numerous expansions of
consciousness which can be traced through all kingdoms and manifestations”?
19. p. 555:
In the way that D.K. uses the word “Idea” on this page, is man an “Idea”? Why or why not?
20. p. 555:
Explain in your own words the “complex reflex action” by means of which
the material sheath responds to vibration.
Show the role of the substance and the subjective life in impulsing the
outer response. Draw the analogy in
relation to “the nerve reactions of the physical frame” in relation to the
brain consciousness.
21. p. 556:
Elucidate the following: “ ... thought
forms will be constructed of mental matter, chosen specifically because it
vibrates to the same type of vibration as the Idea seeking embodiment
...”. When the Tibetan uses the word “Idea”
here, does He mean a pure idea, such as may be found within the Spiritual
Triad, or may He mean something other? If
other, what?
22. p. 556:
Consider the seven subplanes of the systemic mental plane, and give a
brief indication as to the kind of ‘ideas’ which are likely to be embodied upon
each level.
23. p. 556:
Another major purpose of thought forms is “to provide a body for an idea”. Explain how, “in this statement we have
latent the basic principle of incarnation, and of activity, and even of
existence itself”.
24. p. 556:
The Tibetan states, “one fundamental thought must here be given and
pondered upon: This creative impulse, this tendency towards the concretion of the
abstract, this inherent ability to ‘take form’ has its fullest expression as
yet in physical matter. The ‘raison d’être’
being that—for man—all substances with which he creates, all forms which he
builds, and all processes of concretion which he carries on, are created, built
and carried on within the physical body of the Logos.” He further adds, that “herein can be
found the reason for the emphasis laid in nature on the sex aspect, and on that
of physical reproduction ... ” What does your pondering reveal?
25. p. 556:
The Tibetan tells us that the emphasis upon the sex aspect “can be seen
in all the kingdoms of nature, with the exception of the first and fifth.” Then He adds, “this is a most significant
point and the exceptions should be studied in their widest connotation, for
they contain the basic mystery of sex on the involutionary path and on the
evolutionary.” What point is the Tibetan
seeking to make. What is the
significance of the lesser emphasis to be found in the first and fifth kingdoms? Are the two numbers, one and five,
significant in this regard? Consider the
factors of isolation and cleavage.
26. p. 557: What point of logoic systemic evolution is
being discussed when the Tibetan states:
“ ... in due course of time, as the Logos achieves liberation from the
trammels of physical matter, the whole objective system will come to be
regarded as an idea or concept, clothed in a veil or sheath of subtler matter
than the physical, and the logoic body will be viewed as the product of will
and desire, and physical matter in any of its grades will not enter into its
composition.” As a hint, are there any
planetary chains which have no physical vehicle? Which is the next such chain (a chain with no
physical vehicle) to be emphasized within the system of our Heavenly Man? Draw the analogy to our solar Logos.
27. p. 557:
Why will this advanced condition of manifestation within the life of the
solar Logos only be “somewhat apprehended by the man who can function upon the
systemic buddhic plane the fourth cosmic ether”?
28. p. 557:
Why, do you suppose, does our astral plane provide us “with no real
grounds from which to reason concerning the cosmic astral plane”? Give your interpretation of the following: “Only when the astral plane is a calm
receiver of buddhic impulse, or a liquid reflector of that plane (which will
not be till the close of the mahamanvantara) shall we be able to formulate any
ideas anent the cosmic astral plane.” What
sort of mahamanvantara is here meant—the entire duration of the solar systemic
manifestation? Or some shorter cycle? If, for instance, the longer cycle is meant,
what does this tell us about the status, goals and objectives of our solar
Logos in His present incarnation—this second (or fifth) solar system?
29. p. 557:
Discuss sex in all kingdoms as an example of the stimulation of the
solar logoic sacral centre and generative organs. Which planetary scheme do you believe best
corresponds to this center? Why?
30. p. 557:
We are told that, “the desire of the Logos for physical incarnation is as yet the dominant note. Later His desire for that will be less and
will become transmuted into desire for creation on mental levels only. This is what brings the Destroyer aspect into
activity, leading to eventual obscuration, and the physical ‘death’ of the
solar system.” Trace the analogy as
closely as possible in the tiny life of man.
31. p. 558:
Why should developments within the human and animal kingdoms relate so
closely to the mental polarization of the Logos. For instance, when there has been achieved—a)
“the ability of man consciously to create on mental levels, and the consequent
transmutation of his lower sex impulses into higher”; and b), “the mental
vitalisation of another large section of the animal kingdom”, then a “decided
mental polarisation of the Logos” will be indicated? Do you suppose D.K. is speaking of the human
and animal kingdoms upon our Earth only, for if this were the case, the next
round on our globe would see these developments sufficiently accomplished. Or do you think, He is speaking of the human
and animal kingdoms on all the schemes in the solar system?
32. p. 558:
Have you noticed as you have been reading, the almost consistent use of
the term “Heavenly Man” to mean planetary Logos, with occasional meanings of a
lesser nature? Can you find at least
five references in TCF in which the
term Heavenly Man is used a equivalent with planetary Logos? Upon which pages can these references be
found?
33. p. 558:
We read that as the Heavenly Man develops a more cosmically mental
polarisation “He will withdraw force from certain of His lower centres and
globes.” Are “centres” the same as globes, or different? Is it possible that not only certain lower “chains”
may disappear, but that certain globes in manifest chains may disappear? Must there always be a given number of chains
in a scheme and globes in a chain? If
not, what are the variables and possibilities?
We also learn that “in due course of time the entire scheme will be
obscured, and He [the Heavenly Man] will function only in His cosmic astral
body”. From the information gathered
from this statement, what definite limitation is placed upon all chains and
globes within a planetary scheme? Do you
think there is such a thing as form upon
the cosmic astral or cosmic mental planes?
34. pp. 558-559: On these pages we read of the manner of
withdrawal from physical incarnation of
a solar Logos, a planetary Logos or Heavenly Man, and also of the “informing
Life” of a chain (see p. 533). A mystery
concerning the moon chain, and its informing Life is hear discussed. The desire of the moon chain Occupant was no longer for physical
manifestation. Where did the two
withdrawn aspects go? Do you think the Regent of the moon chain
merely ceased to exist? Is there some
way a Regent can subjectively merge with another Regent of another chain? One can see why, in relation to the moon
chain, a great mystery is entailed!
35. p. 559:
Share your impressions on how the entire aspect of the sex question may
change. What does it mean that “emphasis
will be laid upon the laws of mental creation,
on the formulation of thought-forms in a scientific manner, and the dense
physical form will be in abeyance ... ”?
What will it mean for the fourth kingdom and the third to stand “distinct
from each other”?
36. p. 559:
The Tibetan prophesies that one day “creation will eventually be the result of thought impulses and not
desire impulses.” What thoughts come
to you in regard to this prophecy? D.K. states
that the time for these developments will be far ahead? How far ahead? Do you think it will be accomplished in our
root-race or a coming root-race of this fourth round? Why or why not? What have the processes of White Magic to do
with this new form of reproduction? How
are the fifth and seventh rays involved?
Do you see any role for the Scientific Servers in this process? What?
37. p. 560:
The Tibetan seems to think that changing the terminology with which the
sex question is discussed will contribute to redemption and purification. Do you agree with Him? If so, why do you think He is correct? To what extent do you think we are now
capable of discussing the sex question in terms of positive and negative energy?
38. p. 560:
The following is a definition of an embodied idea. Please discuss it: “An embodied idea, therefore, is literally a
positive impulse, emanating from mental levels and clothing itself in a veil of
negative substance. These two factors in
turn will be regarded as emanations from a still greater centre, which is expressing
purpose through them both.” What is the
nature of this “still greater force centre”?
Is D.K. saying that ideas emanate from the mental plane?
39. p. 560:
Discuss how the three major functions of a thought form are related to
the three major aspects of divinity. How
is it that when the function of carrying
out a specific purpose is meditated upon it will be seen to include both response to vibration and the factor of providing a body for an idea?
40. p. 561:
Discuss the importance of The
Factor of Identity in relation to the “Specific Purpose” of a thought form.
41. p. 561:
Discuss the importance of The
Factor of Time in relation to the “Specific Purpose” of a thought form. Contrast the purposes of the three periods of
construction, utilisation and dissolution.
Given the long period of your incarnations, where do you think you stand
(as a soul) with respect to these three periods? Why? With
respect to your present incarnation, which period are you focused within? Why?
42. p. 562:
A study of the kind of life that withdraws when the entity utilizing a
thought form has fulfilled its purposes is most interesting. What is meant by the fact that the
withdrawing objective life is “spiritual life
where cosmic thoughtforms are concerned; manasic
life when solar thoughtforms are constructed; and elemental life where human thought-forms are built”? What kinds of entities are denoted by the three words spiritual, manasic, and elemental?
43. p. 562:
How is it that quality reveals
purpose? In what ways will the purpose
of a thoughtform reveal itself through color, vibration, direction and keynote?
44. p. 562:
A fundamental statement is made in the following: “Every thought-form comes under the law of
Karma through the effect it produces”. Please
elucidate what is meant.
45. p. 562:
Explain the present developments within the solar system as the
transition between dense physical life and existence in the logoic etheric body. How, in general, will the Logos be affected
by this transition? How will man be
affected? We know the definition of a sacred planet, and of a sacred human being. Do you think that our solar Logos is sacred in the analogous sense? Why or why not?
46. p. 562:
What are the implications of the following: “... only
cosmic and solar lords formulate thoughts. The lunar Lords and all lesser
Intelligences do not do so”? What does
this tell us about the status of Man?
47. p. 562:
Discuss the relationship between self-consciousness, responsibility and
karma. Although animals are not held
responsible, they nevertheless suffer on the physical plane. Is this fair? Why or why not?
48. p. 563:
What, in your own words, are memory and anticipation? What role do memory and anticipation play in
relation to the factor of Karma? How
would stimulation of the spark of mind within animal man make memory and
anticipation possible?
49. p. 563:
What was the “sin of the mindless”?
Why is there a “mystery” associated with this sin? Interpret the following from The Secret
Doctrine: “They (the sexes) had
already separated before the ray of divine reason had enlightened the dark
region of their hitherto slumbering minds, and had sinned. That is to say, they
had committed evil unconsciously by producing an effect which was unnatural.”
50. p. 563:
After studying somewhat the nature of the “sin of the mindless” why do
you think it was responsible for “the fearful karmic relationship which now
exists between the third and the fourth kingdom in nature”? In attempting to answer this question,
research the nature of the entity which ensouls the animal kingdom and its
relationship with the entity which ensouls the human kingdom.
51. p. 563:
Offer your ideas anent the following:
“The specific purpose of a thought-form is connected very closely with
the type of deva essence of which it is constructed, and (in connection with
man on the mental plane), with the type of elemental which he can control and
send forth as the occupier or vitalising agency of the thought-form.”
52. pp. 563-564: Three classes of creators work through
different kinds of elemental essence. The
solar Logoi work through the Manasaputras.
In this case, what is a “Manasaputra”? Is the Tibetan speaking of manasaputras or
of Divine Manasaputras? Why or why not? “The planetary
Logos work primarily through the Builders of the next three planes
(atma-buddhi-manas), who construct and control the work of the planetary
schemes”. What is the nature of these
Builders? Should they too be called greater builders? Are they sometimes so called? Men work through lesser builders—“builders of
the lower mental planes and the astral plane ... ”. Are these various grades of builders related
to the Creative Hierarchies found on pp. 34-35 of Esoteric Astrology? If
so, how so? What are some of the various
names of these builders? Where do the
Ah-Hi and the Elohim fit? What other
angelic or devic groups should be mentioned among them?
53. pp. 564-564: Study carefully Tabulation IV on THE BUILDING
ENTITIES. Why is it that the mineral
kingdom can in no way be considered a “principle”? A “principle” in relation to what sort of
entity? What good reasons are there for
the statement that the vegetable kingdom has “peculiar place in the economy of
the system as the transmitter of vital pranic fluid”? Can you think of any way in which the vegetable
kingdom “is definitely a bridge between the conscious and the unconscious”? Discuss the relationship between sensation and the second kingdom, the
vegetable kingdom. Why is it said that
the vegetable kingdom approximates “more generally the animal consciousness than
the mineral ...”? Does this make sense
to you? It is said that the vegetable
kingdom has “a most esoteric relationship to the deva evolution”. Can you think of any reasons for this? What?
54. p. 565:
Tabulation IV contains some surprising entries. Why is the Grand Heavenly Man listed as the personality of the solar Logos? Consult various references to the “Grand
Heavenly Man” and see if this assignation always makes sense or if the term “Grand
Heavenly Man” is used variously. Why is
the term “Heavenly Man” listed here in connection with the personality of the Planetary Logos?
What would the personality of the solar Logos comprise? What would the personality of the Planetary
Logos comprise? Do you think that the
terms Grand Heavenly Man and Heavenly Man refer to combinations of principles for the entities listed or to sub-entities ? (A personality considered as a whole would be
a combination of principles whereas
a chakra would be a sub-entity. What aspects of both these Logoi would exist beyond their personalities and upon what planes would
these aspects be found?
55. p. 565:
In relation to Tabulation IV, consider the discussion of the Kingdoms of
Nature, both within this book, and within Esoteric Psychology, Vol. I. What
do you understand by the fifth, sixth and seventh kingdoms of nature? What sorts of beings belong to these kingdoms? Are Masters of the Wisdom members of the
fifth kingdom of nature? Why or why not? Are chohans members of the fifth or sixth
kingdoms of nature? Why or why not? Do the human initiations as we know them
(initiations such as the fifth, sixth and seventh) correspond to the kingdoms
as listed here? Why or why not? How so, if so? Would you say that such entities as planetary
Logoi and solar Logos are members of
the sixth and seventh kingdoms respectively, or work through those entities who are members of these two kingdoms? What do you think? Why?
56. p. 565:
In relation to Tabulation IV study the centres assigned to the
various entities. Why are Heart and
Throat but not Head assigned to the Planetary Logoi? Why are the Solar Plexus and Base of Spine
assigned to the human kingdom? Why the
Generative Organs (but, note, not the Sacral Center) to the animal kingdom? What has the vegetable kingdom to do with the
Spleen? Why are no centers assigned to
the mineral kingdom? There is much
occultism hinted in these assignments. Assuming
that the various entities express as chakras within one entity inclusive of all
the entities listed, what sort of entity might this inclusive entity be? What might be its name? Do you note entries in this tabulation which
appear to you inconsistent or contradictory?
If so, which?
57. pp. 564-566: Give your interpretation of kingdoms of
nature as “forms of thought”. This is a
different way of considering a kingdom of nature. What do you think?
58. p. 566:
There are four particular points which the Tibetan discusses in terms of
the purpose of a thought-form: 1) The Factor of Identity; 2) The Factor of
Time; 3) The Factor of Karma; 4) The Factor of the Lesser Builders. Give your summary of the importance of these
four factors and of the way in which they (taken together) interact in
influencing how a specific thought-form carries out the purpose of its originator.
59. p. 566:
We are told that there is value, when considering the larger picture as
it relates to a solar Logos, in expanding the concept and widening the horizon
of the Thinker. Does this type of
expanding and widening have anything that one might call “practical value”? Of what service is it to humanity, if any?
60. p. 566:
Seven questions are formulated for us by the Tibetan in relation to the
purpose of our solar Logos and His system.
The revelation of the answers are left by the Tibetan to the future. However, it might be asked at this point,
what sorts of illuminating thoughts come to you in relation to these questions? For Question 1, think of the number of the
incarnation of the solar Logos; think of His relation to Sirius, the Pleiades,
Taurus and Scorpio; think of the Cosmic Path He is upon, etc. For Question 2, think of the place which our planetary Logos may
occupy as a center within the system
of the Blue Logos; think of the other planets with which our planetary Logos is
most affiliated; think of the synthesizing scheme with which our planetary
Logos is most affiliated; think of His present point of polarization upon the
cosmic astral plane; etc. For Question
3, consider some of the hints listed under Question 2; consider the chains,
globes and rounds as listed in the tabulation on p. 693 of Esoteric
Astrology; consider the schemes the physical globes of which are either in
or entering obscuration; consider the rays of our planetary Logos—the first,
second and third; etc. For Question 4,
consider the centers which Earth and Venus are likely to represent, and what a
relationship between such centers might mean for the development of the solar
Logos; consider their respective polarizations upon the cosmic astral plane;
consider the ascending dualities of Venus/Earth, Sirius/Sun, Pollux/Castor, etc. For Question 5, research the various centers
in various greater entities which our earth’s animal kingdom is said to
represent; also, consult the Chart on p. 844 in relation to the animal
kingdom—system wide; consider the relationship of both Mars and the Moon in
relation to the animal kingdom; consider why the human kingdom, at least upon
our planet, still has an animal body;
etc.. For Question 6, consider the
relationship between the root races and the incarnations of our planetary
Logos; consider the aggregation of “4’s” which are characteristic of this
present “moment” in the life of our planetary Logos; consider the process by
which our planet is to become sacred and the role of the human root-races in that
process; consider the importance of the number “5” and the various types of
entities with which that number connects the human family; etc. For Question 7, definitely consider the soul
and personality rays of each nation for which such rays are given; review
Formula II in the context of this question; consider the relationship of
branch-races to nations; consider nationhood in relation to the Law of
Synthesis; consider what a nation really
is; etc.
61. p. 567:
What do you learn numerologically from the fact that there are three
great laws (cosmic ones) and seven subsidiary laws (solar systemic ones)?
62. p. 567:
In your own words discuss the Law
of Synthesis and its import. Why is
the buddhic faculty necessary to understand the scope of this law. Why does the Tibetan say that this law demonstrates “the fact that all
things—abstract and concrete—exist as one”.
Explain the following: “it is the
law governing the thought form of that One of the cosmic Logoi, in Whose
consciousness both our system, and our greater centre, have a part”. In this instance, what is a cosmic Logos? What does the Tibetan mean by “our greater
centre”? This is an important question
within the Science of Relationships. Do
you know how to regard “the sumtotal, the centre and the periphery, and the
circle of manifestation ... as a unit”? What
sign or signs of the zodiac have most to do with the Law of Synthesis and why? Which great constellation is associated with
this law? To what extent do you believe
you function under the Law of Synthesis?
63. p. 568:
In your own words discuss the Law
of Attraction and Repulsion and its import.
Why does the Tibetan include the words “and Repulsion” in naming this
law? Can you understand the factor of
repulsion in relation to the third Divine Aspect? If so, how so? How do you think the Law of Attraction
functions? (Discuss similarity,
difference, harmony and indifference in this regard). Discuss the holding power of this manifests under this law. What sign or signs of the zodiac have most to
do with the Law of Attraction and Repulsion and why? Which great constellation is associated with
this law? To what extent do you believe
you function under the Law of Attraction and Repulsion?
64. p. 568:
In your own words discuss the Law
of Economy and its import. Enlarge
upon the following: “it is the law which
adjusts all that concerns the material and spiritual evolution of the cosmos to
the best possible advantage and with the least expenditure of force.” What do you think the Tibetan means by the
interesting phrase “each atom of time”? What
sign or signs of the zodiac have most to do with the Law of Economy and why? Which great constellation is associated with
this law? To what extent do you believe
you function under the Law of Economy?
65. p. 568:
In relation the Law of Economy D.K. states: “Unevenness of rhythm is really an illusion
of time, and does not exist in the cosmic centre. We need to ponder on this, for it holds the
secret of peace ...”. Give your
interpretation of these arresting words.
What are the hints and implications you gather from analyzing the
Tibetan’s words?
66. p. 568:
The following prophesies a future development for humanity; how do you
interpret the Tibetan’s words? “ ... we
need to grasp the significance of that word through,
for it describes the next racial expansion of consciousness, and has an occult
meaning.” Discuss the word through in relation to transmutation,
transfiguration and translation. What
relation has the seventh Ray to these processes? How about Uranus? Do you see any connection between the concept
of through and the qualities of
Neptune, Vishnu and the number ‘6’?
67. p. 568:
Think carefully and see if you can describe what happens when the
attempt is made to “resolve abstractions into the terms of speech”. It is one thing to say that there is a loss
of “inner sense” because of the process of resolving, but another to know why that loss occurs. Think of your own process and see what you
can determine.
68. p. 569:
The Tibetan states that “in each of these seven laws (of the solar
system) we find an interesting correlation with the seven planes.” How would you describe this correlation in
the case of each law?
69. p. 569:
In your own words give a brief summary of the meaning and importance of
each of the seven laws of the solar system.
Why is each law named as it is? Explain
what you believe to be the significance of each name.
70. p. 569:
Why is the Law of Vibration
the basis of manifestation? What does it
mean that this law is the “atomic law” of the system? With what planetary force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what ray
force or forces would you connect this law and why? With what star of the Great Bear would you
link this law and why? Forget not that
each of the stars of the Great Bear is considered a prototype of one of the
seven Heavenly Men.
71. p. 569:
The Law of Cohesion: What justification is there for saying
that cohesion is first apparent upon the second plane of the system? Contrast the meaning of “molecular” with “atomic”. Is there a difference between coherency as
found on the other systemic planes and the “divine coherency” which is found
upon this plane? With what planetary
force or forces would you connect this law and why? With what ray force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what star
of the Great Bear would you link this law and why?
72. p. 569:
The Law of Disintegration: What is the meaning of “the final
casing-off, the ultimate shedding of the sheaths of the fivefold superman”? Why is it fitting and appropriate that this
process occur on the third plane? What
has the name of this law to do with the process of casting-off here described? Are there Chohans of initiations higher than
the sixth? If so, can you find the
reference? Why does a Chohan cast off
the five forces and what, do you think, would be some of the results? With what planetary force or forces would you
connect this law and why? What
connection has the planetary force or forces with the specific casting-off
process described in this paragraph? With
what ray force or forces would you connect this law and why? With what star of the Great Bear would you
link this law and why?
73. p. 569:
The Law of Magnetic Control: Why should the buddhic plane be the plane
on which this law predominantly hold sway?
What is it about the buddhic plane which makes it an ideal focus for the
working out of this law? What can be
meant by the thought that “in the development of the control of this law lies
hid the control of the personality by the Monad via the egoic body”? With what planetary force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what ray
force or forces would you connect this law and why?
74. p. 569:
The Law of Fixation: The name of this law is unusual. In what way is “fixation” involved in the
working out of this law which brings control, stability and coherency by means
of the mind? What is fixed and by what is it fixed? With what planetary
force or forces would you connect this law and why? With what ray force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what star
of the Great Bear would you link this law and why?
75. p. 569:
The Law of Love: What is the meaning of “the transmutation
of the desire nature”? What will be the
result of linking the desire nature “with the greater magnetism of the love
aspect on the buddhic plane”? With what
planetary force or forces would you connect this law and why? With what ray force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what star
of the Great Bear would you link this law and why?
76. p. 569:
The Law of Sacrifice and Death: This law is apparently involved with “the
destruction of form, in order that the evolving life may progress ... ”. With what planetary force or forces would you
connect this law and why? With what ray
force or forces would you connect this law and why? How do these planetary and ray forces
contribute to the execution of the goal of this law? With what star of the Great Bear would you
link this law and why?
77. p. 570:
Why is the Law of Karma called “The
Intermediate Law of Karma”? What
is meant by the idea that the Law of Karma is the “synthetic” law of the system
of Sirius? Think about Sirius as the
source of planetary and solar systemic initiation. How do such thoughts accord with the fact
that “the Law of Karma ... predicates the effect the Sirian system has on our
solar system”? Why is the Sirian system
called “our parent system”? Is the word “parent”
used literally or more loosely, do you think?
If the Earth has such a potent effect upon the Venus scheme, why should
our solar system have such a negligible effect upon the Sirian system? It is relatively easy to associate the
influence of Saturn with what we experience as karma. How, given the qualities we understand
emanate from Sirius, can we associate Sirius with karma? What do you suppose the Tibetan means by “systemic
karma”? Can you see the relationship
between systemic karma and what is usually called Karma by man?
78. p. 570:
Are the Lipika Lords Sirian in origin or do They originate within our
solar system. Find other references to
Them and see if you can throw light upon Their origin or Their differentiations? What significance occurs to you that the
four Lipika Lords of our system are under the rule of “a greater corresponding
Lord on Sirius”? Note that, apparently, four Lords are under the supervision of one Lord.
79. p. 570:
The total number of laws discussed in this section comes to eleven:
three cosmic laws, seven systemic laws and one intermediate law. What significance do you see in relation to
this number? With what other structures
or processes is the number eleven associated?
What connections exist between the number eleven and the number two and
the sign Aquarius and Gemini? What are
the significances of these connections?
80. p. 570:
What justification can you make for calling each of our seven systemic
planes a subsidiary cosmic vibration? Is a plane a vibration or a state of
consciousness, or a combination of the two?
Explain.
81. p. 570:
Discuss the similarity which exists in the polarization of the solar
Logos and the tiny unit, Man.
82. p. 570:
What significance do you attribute to the fact that “in this greater
manvantara, the Logos [solar Logos] is to take the fourth cosmic initiation”? What relation has this fact to the status and
development of the human kingdom, the fourth Creative Hierarchy? Find that section of the book in which the
intended initiations of Sanat Kumara and of our planetary Logos are discussed. Tie this information to the initiatory
process of our solar Logos. What do you
learn by so doing, and what are the implications of what you learn?
83. p. 571:
Why is this round, the fourth, considered the “astral round”? Do you think that, as regards all rounds on
all chains, the fourth round would be considered the astral round? Why or why not?
84. p. 571:
Give your interpretation of the following occultly significant sentence: “The system of the Sirian Logos is on the
cosmic mental plane, and in a subtle way, incomprehensible to us, our Logos,
with His system, forms a part of a still greater Logos”. To which entity does the term “His” refer—to
our own Logos or to the Sirian Logos? Why? What do you think it means to be “on” a
plane, such as the cosmic astral for our Logos and the cosmic mental for the
Sirian Logos? The Tibetan further
states, with reference to the sentence under examination that “it is in this
analogy that the basic idea can be found of all teaching given out about the
Grand Heavenly Man”. What do you think
He means by this statement? Remember,
that the Grand Heavenly man sometimes seems to refer to the solar Logos entire,
and sometimes, as per Tabulation IV, to the personality aspect of the solar
Logos? Is the Tibetan offering here
still another possible interpretation, or not?
85. p. 571:
We learn that the three cosmic laws are “the three laws of the cosmic
higher planes”. This is a fact rarely
stated elsewhere if at all. What does it
mean? To which cosmic planes do you
think that the three cosmic laws refer?:
Cosmic Logoic, Cosmic Monadic and Cosmic Atmic; or, Cosmic Atmic, Cosmic
Buddhic and Cosmic Manasic ( in other words, the Cosmic Triadic level). Why do you think so?
86. p. 571:
We learn that the “great law of Sirius, Law of Karma has for its special
point of focus the third subplane of the cosmic mental plane. Does this seem accurate to you under the Law
of Correspondences? Why the third subplane? Is there a connection between the number “3”
and the Law of Karma? What? What does it mean that the Law of Karma “ ...
really controls our Logos, and His actions, in the same way as the ego—in due
course of evolution—controls the human personality”? If Agni can be considered as the personality
of the solar Logos, what is the relationship between the Sirian Logos wielding
the Law of Karma and the great being Agni?
(Remember that Agni is protean and has many meanings, greater and
lesser).
87. p. 571:
Can it be said that Sirius is the “soul” of our solar Logos? Why or why not? Can it be said that Venus is the “soul” of
Earth? Why or why not? If yes, explain? If not, explain the relationship between
Sirius and the soul of the solar Logos, and Venus and the soul of Earth.
88. p. 571:
The Tibetan makes and fascinating and enigmatic statement after assuring
us that we cannot possibly understand even the A B C’s of cosmic truth: “Of one thing we can be sure, and that is
that identity ever remains”. What does He mean by this? Is He speaking intra-cosmically or inter-cosmically?
In the light of what is given in the first part of Volume I of The
Secret Doctrine, do you think the
idea that “identity every remains” is consistent with what is said of the Days
and Nights of Brahman? Could there be
another interpretation of this idea regarding the continuity of identity which
would be applicable not only for this universe but for the manifestation of all universes? Could there be still another interpretation
of the idea which would be applicable also
during those “times” when there is no universe?
89. pp. 571-572: These two pages are rich in examples of how a
single term can be used to indicate different levels of entities. Which are the similar terms and which the
different levels of entities?
90. p. 572:
Our Logos is said to form “part of the Consciousness of the Logos of
Sirius”. Note that it was not said that our Logos forms a center within the body of manifestation
of the Logos of Sirius. Further, “in His
turn, the Sirian Logos forms one of the seven Grand Heavenly Men, who are the
centres in the body of the ONE OF WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID”.
Do you think the term “Logos of Sirius” applies here to an entity at the solar systemic level or to an entity at
the constellational level? Why or why not? Usually the term “Grand Heavenly Man” refers
to the Logos of a solar system. If this
is so, we have seven solar Logoi among which both our Logos and the Logos of
Sirius are numbered—all these forming the seven centers of a Being (at the constellational level) called the
ONE
OF WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID. If, however, the term “Grand Heavenly Men”
can be applied to Beings at the constellational
level, then we will have seven such
constellations forming the seven centers in a super-constellational entity called the ONE
OF WHOM NOUGHT MAY BE SAID. Which way do you think is accurate?
91. pp. 571-572: Discuss (in terms of the Logos, the planetary
Logos, and man) the analogy of the Builder, the material and the laws for
choosing material and controlling the material chosen, and the process for
fulfilling intention by means of the chosen material.
92. p. 572:
Offer you interpretation of the following: “We must not forget that three great symbols
stand, in the mind of the Logos, for each of His three systems, that the whole
exists for Him as a concrete thought-form, for He is learning to manipulate the
matter of the cosmic mental plane on concrete levels, in the same way that man
is working on the laws of thought, and on the building of thought-forms.” Can you find the reference wherein it is
discussed that really our Logos is manifesting through five systems? The Tibetan
offers some inkling of two of the three symbols. For System I—”a swastika of ten arms
revolving at right angles, of a radiant green colour, all the ten arms
emanating from a central blazing sun ... ”.
“The basic thought-form for the
second system embodies the green
swastika of the first manifestation, and adds to it concentric and interlaced
circles in blue, in groups of three, linked by one large circle”. Why the swastika? Why green?
Why ten? Why does the swastika
emanate from a blazing sun? Why is the
first symbol included within the second?
Why circles (both concentric and interlaced) for the second symbol? Are groups of concentric circles interlaced,
forming an “interference pattern” arising from the ripple effect? Why the color blue? Why in groups of three? How many circles in a concentric circle? How many groups of three, do you think? Why all linked by one large circle? Do you think the number ‘10’ may appear again
in the symbol for System II, as in the symbol for System I, or perhaps a
different number? How about the number “18”? (See p. 574.) Note that 10 + 18 = 28, the number associated
with Capricorn (which itself indicates the union of the third and second
aspects of divinity). Give yourself
permission to speculate.
93. pp. 573-574: Examine the tabulation of many fours found on these two pages. What do you learn? Give your interpretation of the following
physical manifestation of the Law of Magnetic Control as it operates upon the
physical plane which, counting down from the buddhic plane, is also ruled by
the number four: “Dense Physical
Magnetism, controlling sex manifestation on the physical plane, and inspired by
astral desire, the reflection of the buddhic.”
94. p. 574:
In the more detailed presentation of the Law of Vibration, we are told
that “it marks the beginning work of the Logos, the first setting in motion of
mulaprakriti”. In relation to a solar
Logos, do you think that the substance upon which and by means of which this
great being works out its intended design should be called mulaprakriti? Why or why
not?
95. p. 574:
What is the meaning of “the key measure” of a particular plane? How would this key measure be expressed?
96. p. 574:
Why is it correct to sum up the significance of the Law of Vibration in
terms of “light” and “fire”? In what way
does it seem justified to you to say that this Law of Vibration is the Law of
Fire; that “it governs the transmutation of differentiated colours back to
their synthesis. It controls the
breaking up of the One into the seven, and then the reabsorption back into the
One”. Discuss vibration as the common denominator of all differentiated kinds and
qualities of energy.
97. p. 574:
Do you think the Logos uttered His “threefold Sound” simultaneously or
sequentially? Do you think the major
cosmic chord has three notes or four notes?
If there is one note for each of the three solar systems, from whence
would the fourth note come? Do you think
if there were a fourth note is would serve as the fundamental tone or the
octave of the fundamental?
98. p. 574:
We learn that each note in the major cosmic chord “has six subtones,
which, with the first, make the seven”. Give
your interpretation of the following profound occultism: “ ... the law of Vibration, therefore,
comprises eighteen lesser vibrations and three major, making the twenty-one of
our three systems. Two multiplied by
none (2x9), makes the necessary eighteen, which is the key number of our love
system. Twenty-seven holds hid the
mystery of the third system”. In what
way should the number twenty-one be associated with all our three systems taken
together? Why should eighteen be the
number appropriate to our second or love system? We often hear of the eighteen subplanes in
relation to the personality elemental. What
if one began counting upwards from
the lowest subplane of the buddhic plane, what subplane would be reached? The threshold of the third subplane of the
monadic plane? Discuss the Solar Angels
as a bridge between the lunar life of the system and the truly vital life beginning upon the buddhic
plane. Is the focus of our second system
upon the cosmic dense physical planes or the cosmic etheric planes? What link has all this with the idea that the
next solar system, the third, will begin upon the monadic plane? Is there any reason for considering the
number of the first solar system to be nine? Do you see any connection between the number
twenty-seven (which holds the mystery of the third system) and the number of
members in the tenth seed group, the group of Creative Manifesters?
99. pp. 574-575: Consult both of these pages and try to
determine whether the Logos uttered a threefold sound or a sevenfold sound. What is the justification for saying that
each sevenfold sound (the “seven great Breaths or Sounds”) is a subdivision of
one of the major three Sounds—one for each solar system? Are the seven great Sounds results of vibration or causes of vibration?
100. p. 575:
In the context of the paragraph on top of p. 575, interpret the
following: “We get the same correspondence
here as we did in the matter of the Rays, for we shall find that the lines of
vibration are 1-2-4-6. Logically this
would be so, for involution is negative, receptive, and corresponds to the
feminine pole, just as the abstract rays were 2-4-6. This truth requires meditation, and an attempt
to think abstractly ... ”. What does the
Tibetan mean by “lines of vibration”? Why
does He not refer to planes 3-5-7? And
yet the seven great Breaths drove to the atomic subplane of each plane, so 3-5-7 are not excluded? What point is He trying to make in connection
with our second solar system?
101. p. 575:
What is the result in the world of form when “all that evolves on each
plane attains the vibration of the atomic subplane ...” ?
102. p. 575:
In the light of what is discussed on this page, what would be the
significance of summing 21+35+49=105? What
is the special significance of 105 and to what grouping(s) does it refer? What is the significance of 108 (either in
relation to the planetary manifestation or to the solar systemic) and how can
one derive it from 105? What would it
mean to add 3? What would the number 3
represent?
103. p. 575:
Attempt to throw some light upon the following: “When, therefore, we have achieved the first
main vibrations, and have perfected vehicles for all evolutions (not merely the
human). of fivefold atomic subplane
matter, then we have completed the round of evolution for this system”. What is meant by “fivefold atomic subplane
matter”? What, analogically, might be
said of the completion of the first solar system? What, analogically, might be said of the
completion of the third solar system? Why
is the number five so closely
connected to this our second solar system?
Which of the great constellations is particularly connected to the
number five? The number seven will be particularly important in
the third solar system. Which of the
three great constellations is particularly connected with the number seven and will be particularly important then? Why?
104. p. 575:
In our solar system, a seven great Breaths go forth, but there is
completion only upon five systemic
planes, correct? What influence do the
other two Breaths have? Upon what planes
are They influential?
105. p. 575:
As these pages have unfolded various numbers have been associated with
the three solar systems taken collectively and separately, what can one say
about the relationships existing between the following numbers? 10, 21, 3, 6, 9, 18, 27, and then, some
series—21-35-49, 3-5-7, 5-7-9 (the number of vibrations associated with each
solar system respectively, remembering that ‘5’, as a beginning point, is the
number of Brahma and, hence, Intelligence).
Perhaps you can think of other numbers associated with these three
systems?
106. p. 575:
Discuss 6 and 7 as numbers of completion; 8 as the number of preliminary
absorption into three synthesizing units; and 9 as the number of final
absorption into synthesis—a unified trinity.
Show also why the 9 must become a 10.
As you do this, think of the process of absorption and obscuration in
relation to planetary globes, chains and eventually schemes. Think of the Sun (10) as the “Great Resolver”.
107. p. 575:
What does it mean to “vibrate positively” as contrasted with proceeding “along
the line of least resistance”? What
implications do you see in the following:
“Only the human Monads, and only in the three worlds, follow the
positive line, and by resistance, struggle, battle and strife learn the lesson
of divine acquiescence”.
On the basis of these thoughts, do you think a particular ray quality
could be assigned to the human Monads collectively? (Remember the personality ray of humanity is
the fifth, while the soul ray of humanity is the fourth). We also learn that “owing to the increase of
friction through that very struggle, they [the fourth Creative Hierarchy] progress
with a relatively greater rapidity than the devas. They have need to do this, for they have lost
ground to make up”. How does friction
contribute to more rapid progress? What
do you think D.K. is referring to when he speaks of “lost ground”?
108. p. 575:
In what way can the Law of Vibration be connected with rotation?
109. p. 576:
Should the five planes be called the “five planes of human evolution” or
the five planes of super-human evolution?
110. p. 576:
Give your interpretation of the following: “The human race came into the chain at a
point where it naturally took bodies of the fifth astral and physical
subplanes, and we can see here an analogy to the coming into the fourth
root-race of the more advanced Egos.” The
lowest two subplanes on the systemic physical plane are the liquid and dense
layers. Our bodies certainly have liquid
and dense aspects and yet we are told that “the two lowest subplanes are too
low for deva or human bodies”. How can
we explain the apparent contradiction?
111. p. 576:
Focus upon the Law of Attraction and discuss how it manifests upon the
three planes—monadic, buddhic and astral.
112. p. 580:
Seek to draw an analogy between the first systemic law, the Law of
Vibration, and the first law of the soul, the Law of Sacrifice? Is there a connection other than
numerological?
113. p. 576:
Why is the Law of Cohesion called the “law of birth” upon the monadic
plane? What astrological factors
correlate with this designation? Note
that the Monads appear “in their seven groups”.
Do you think these groups are organized by ray quality or by some other
method of organization?
114. p. 576:
Discuss how the process of gathering the essence of all experience is “controlled
throughout from the plane of buddhi”.
115. p. 576:
Share your thoughts upon the following:
“Magnetism and the capacity to show love, are occultly synonymous”.
116. p. 577:
Discuss the implications of the following important statement on the Law
of Attraction: “All branches of the law
of attraction demonstrating in this system, show themselves as a force that
ingathers, that tends to coherence, that results in adhesion, and leads to
absorption”.
117. p. 577:
Why can the Law of Cohesion also be called the “law of coalescence”? Elucidate the following: “The atomic subplane sets the rate of
vibration; the Law of Cohesion might be said to fix the colouring of each plane”.
118. p. 577:
What thoughts come to you in relation to the following?: “In manifestation the cosmic Law of
Attraction controls all these subsidiary laws, just as the Law of Synthesis governs
pralaya and obscuration, and the Law of Economy deals with the general working
out, along the line of least resistance, of the logoic scheme”. What has the factor of synthesis to do with pralaya and obscuration?
119. p. 577:
Work out through the planes and subplanes the idea that the “second law
of the system governs specially the second plane, and the second subplane on
each plane”. Consider the particular
psychic ability present upon each subplane and correlate it with the Law of
Cohesion—Taste, Imagination, Response to Group Vibration. The siddhis relating to the second subplane
upon the buddhic and atmic planes are not given.
120. p. 578:
As you ponder the following, what implications occur to you: “It is interesting to realise that it is on
the second subplane of the monadic plane that the majority of Monads have their
habitat; there are a few Monads of power or will on the atomic subplane, but
their numbers are not many, and they simply form a nucleus in evolutionary
preparation for System III, the power system.
The majority of Monads are on the second subplane and they are the
Monads of love; on the third subplane can be found quite a number of the Monads
of activity, but numerically they are not as many as the Monads of love. They are the failures of System I”. D.K. speaks of “a few Monads of power or will”. Yet there are said to be “5 thousand million
Monads of power”. Do you think that this
great number is what He means by “a few”, or that not all of this great number
is focussed upon the cosmic physical plane?
Why do you suppose the Monads of Love are in the majority when elsewhere
(Esoteric Psychology, Vol. II) D.K. states the majority of Monads which
pass through the Earth, Mars and Saturn schemes are ray three Monads? For what reason, other than numerical
resonance, do you think that each type of Monad is found focussed upon the
subplane which corresponds to its ray number?
What is a failure of System I? Can you think of any connection which System
I failures have with the Moon chain? Do you
think that all Monads upon the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh rays are also failures of System I? Why or why not?
121. p. 578:
We have often been told that there is a “direct channel ... between the
atomic subplane on each plane”? What are
the implications that there is “more or less” a direct channel between “each
subplane and its corresponding higher subplane numerically ... ”. Consult Letters on Occult Meditation and
seek to determine what developments must occur within the various personality
vehicles in order for them to be composed of second subplane matter. If Monads of Love “link up with peculiar
facility with all their vehicles when composed of second subplane matter” do
you think the same is true of Monads of Activity when their vehicles are
composed of third subplane matter and of Monads of Power when the vehicles are
composed of atomic matter?
122. p. 578:
The following statement is most occult and full of import. Please give your interpretation: “After initiation, the causal body is found
on the second subplane of the mental plane, and monadic control then commences”. Which initiation—the first or third, and why? What is meant by “monadic control”? Full control or developing monadic control? To what extent does it seem justifiable that
some degree of monadic influence may begin at the first initiation? To what extent does the beginning of the
initiation process mark the point at which the “third Outpouring” begins to
prevail over the “second Outpouring”?
123. p. 578:
Do you think that the numbers of Monads given (sixty billion) pertains
to our globe, our chain, our scheme or the entire solar system? Why or why not?
124. p. 578:
We learn that the Monads of love return (after life in the three worlds
and the attainment of the goal) to their originating second subplane, that
being also the goal for the monads of activity who have to develop the love
aspect”. Have the Monads ever really
departed from their point of origin? Why
yes or why no? Which type of petal
within the Egoic Lotus do you believe is the most difficult for Monads of
Activity to develop? Why? In what way do you think Monads of Activity
develop the love aspect? Is such love
developed within the three worlds of normal human evolution? Why is the will or power aspect needed if
both groups of Monads (those on the second or third rays) are to successfully
master the atomic and sub-atomic subplanes within the five worlds of
super-human evolution?
125. p. 578:
Give your interpretation of the Biblical statement—the “Kingdom of God
suffereth violence and the violent take it by force.” Can you think of any higher interpretations
of this adage? Why is will so needed in
the Monads’ attempt to master the atomic subplane of each plane?
126. pp. 578-579: What are the implications of: “The Monads of Power have a much greater
struggle, and hence the fact so often apparent that people on what we term the
power Ray, have so often a hard time, and are so frequently unlovable. They have to build in on all the six planes
the love aspect, which is not prominent in their development”? Why is the love aspect not prominent in their
development? Note the use of the term “people”
in describing those monadically upon the Ray of Power. Does this suggest to you that the monadic ray
can be discernible in people, i.e.,
at the personality level? Why yes or no?
127. p. 579:
What thoughts and associations come to you when you contemplate that
there are 60 billion (American numerical system) human Monads?
128. p. 579:
Analyze the following and give your interpretation of possible
implications: “The Monads of power,
though in manifestation, are as yet very rare in incarnation. They came in, in large numbers, at the close
of the moon chain, and will come in again in full numerical strength in the
last two rounds of the present chain.” What
does D.K. mean by the word “manifestation”?
Existence upon the cosmic physical plane? Is it possible that a Monad may not be in manifestation? What sort of location or state would this
involve? What does D.K. mean by the word
“incarnation”? Given what is offered
here, should there be numbered among disciples those who monadically are upon
the first Ray? Why or why not? Consult Esoteric Psychology, Vol. II, and seek to determine if there was any
other time when a large number of the Monads of Power entered incarnation? If there was another such time, what was that
time? Why will the last two rounds of
the present chain offer particular opportunity to the Monads of Power? If the Monads of Power are not in
incarnation, where within the planetary chain or scheme might they be?
129. p. 579:
Contrast conditions in our chain as they existed in the first round and
the second. If cohesion is the
distinguishing feature of our second system, what sorts of conditions
distinguished the first system?
130. p. 579:
Share your thoughts anent the momentous implications of the following: “Well might we say that the At-one-ment of the many separated is the
keynote of our system”.
131. p. 580:
Discuss the functioning of the Law of Cohesion in relation to the
evolutionary path. What is the relation
of this law to the second Ray (the Ray of form
building)? What are meaning and
implications of the following: “ ... matter
of the lowest subplane forms the basis of a new plane”? Discuss the factor of synthesis in relation
to atomic planes and subplanes. How does
synthesis provide a means of transition from one plane to the next higher?
132. p. 580:
Seek to draw an analogy between the second systemic law, the Law of
Cohesion, and the second law of the soul, the Law of Magnetic Impulse? Is there a connection?
133. p. 580:
If the Law of Disintegration is
“the law that governs the destruction of the form in order that the indwelling
life may shine forth in fullness” why is it particularly associated with the
third Ray and the number “3” and not the first ray?
134. p. 580:
The Tibetan states that the Law of Disintegration is another aspect of
the Law of Cohesion. How is this similar
to saying that the Repulsion is an aspect of the Law of Attraction. After all, we have been told that the Law of
Repulse is governed by the love of
the soul.
135. p. 580:
Does it seem reasonable to you that the Law of Disintegration ends with
the solar system while the Laws of Attraction, Cohesion and Love last on into
that which is to come? What has this to
do with the relationship between the cosmic physical and cosmic astral planes?
136. p. 580:
The Law of Attraction is the higher correspondence of the Law of
Cohesion. Does the Law of Disintegration
have its higher correspondence? The Law
of Economy is not that higher
correspondence, apparently. What do you
think?
137. p. 580:
Discuss the following as a key example of the functioning of the Law of
Disintegration: “When the Monad has
circled through all disintegrating forms, and has achieved the sixth
Initiation, it is resolved into its primal monadic source, and the five lesser
sheaths are destroyed”. Does the Monad,
per se, achieve the sixth Initiation? What is it that is initiated?
138. p. 580:
Discuss the concept that Monads are “synthesised, not disintegrated”. What, in this context is the “primal monadic
source” into which the Monad is resolved?
139. p. 580:
Discuss the path of involution as the path of construction. Does this mean
that the path of evolution is the path of destruction? Why or why not?
140. p. 580:
What is a group soul, and how, in general, does it function? Why must group souls be broken up? At what point does such a breaking up occur?
141. p. 580:
What is a “permanent triad”? Discuss
the process by which “the permanent triads are transferred from one form to
another.” Why is this necessary? How are the kingdoms of nature involved?
142. p. 581:
Why is it reasonable to associate this law with the onset of great world
cataclysms? Using what you know of the
physical plane catastrophes and their purposes, speculate upon the nature and
purpose of cataclysms and catastrophes upon the astral and lower mental planes.
143. p. 581:
From what the Tibetan tells us about the action of this law upon the
physical, astral and lower mental planes, what planets would you associate with
its working out, and why? What rays
would be involved? Remember that the
atmic plane upon which the Law of Disintegration is principally focussed is the
first plane of Brahma even though it
is the third systemic plane.
144. p. 581:
Discuss the relationship between atma and the law of Disintegration.
145. p. 581:
Discuss ways in which the Law of Disintegration and the Law of
Attraction might interact. The Tibetan
gives us one. Can you think of any
others?
146. p. 581:
Why is the Law of Disintegration so important for successful evolution?
147. p. 581:
Discuss the possible relationship existing between the systemic law, the
Law of Disintegration, and the soul law, the Law of Repulse.
148. p. 581:
If the Law of Disintegration is prominent upon the atmic plane, and if
Mastership means the control of the atmic plane, what role does the Law of
Disintegration play in the life of the Master of the Wisdom?
149. pp. 581-582: The Tibetan tells us that the Law of
Correspondences has been little studied.
What sort of approach or program would be required to make Him change
His opinion? Do you think in terms of
the Law of Correspondences? How often?
150. p. 582:
Give your thoughts about the implications of the following: “... on the third subplane of each plane this
law [the Law of Disintegration] works in a special manner, causing a very
definite breaking-up of something that is tending to separation”. Again, consult the siddhis that are to be
found on each third subplane of our systemic planes, and see if the Tibetan’s
statement makes sense to you: Sight,
Clairvoyance, Spiritual Discernment, Idealism, and All Knowledge. How do these contribute to some significant
form of breaking up obstacles tending to separation?
151. p. 582:
What, practically, does it mean to you that the work of disintegration
begins on the third subplane and is finished on the second? How does disintegration contribute to
cohesion?
152. p. 582:
On this page D.K. gives another way to understand the purpose of the
fourth initiation: “ ... as a man
becomes fit for merging into the Triad, [the] causal body has to be discarded
and done away with.” Discuss this point,
and what it means to merge into the Triad.
Why would the causal body be an obstacle to such merging?
153. p. 582:
What reasons can you give for the fact that the causal body of the
average man is to be found upon the third subplane of the mental plane. Why does the process of initiation refocus
the causal body upon the second subplane?
Can you think of any process which would elevate the causal body to the
first subplane? Why might this final
elevation occur, if it does?
154. p. 582:
Explain the following in terms of the fourth initiation: “Under the Law of Sacrifice and Death, the
disintegration is begun on the third level and is consummated on the second,
when the man merges with the Triad, preparatory to the final merging with the
Monad.” Why is the Law of Sacrifice and
Death mentioned here in connection with the Law of Disintegration? What relationship might these two laws have
with each other? Are the laws most
powerful upon the plane which corresponds to their number, or are they equally
powerful on other systemic planes?
155. p. 582:
Analyze the technicalities concerning the manner in which continuity of
consciousness is achieved. Is the only etheric web that which is to be
found between the third and second subplane of the systemic physical plane? Explain how it is that with the burning away
of this web the man can merge with his astral vehicle. What does this merging really mean?
156. p. 582:
Always, it seems there is a barrier between the third and second
subplanes of each plane. The destruction
of this subplane signifies the merging of Brahma into Vishnu. Pass in review the various systemic planes
and give your understanding of how this process of disintegration might work on
each of these planes. Remember, focus
principally upon the third subplane and the transition, through destruction, to
the second subplane.
157. pp. 582-583: Discuss the principle of adaptability or activity in
relation to the Law of Disintegration. Demonstrate,
through example, how the third ray skillfully applied over time necessitates
the onset of destructive potencies. Discuss
the role of Capricorn and Saturn in this process. In this solar system, do you believe we have
achieved the point of the recapitulatory perfection of the Brahma aspect? What would be expected when such a point of
perfection of the third aspect was reached?
158. p. 583:
Discuss the manner in which the number “3” indicates a kind of
fulfillment which must be broken.
159. p. 583:
Does it seem reasonable to you that “on the moon chain the point of
attainment for the individual was the arhat or fourth Initiation,—the
initiation which marks the final breaking with the three worlds, and the
disintegration of the egoic body.” Did
any of our present humanity achieve arhatship on the moon chain? Why or why not? Did the Buddha achieve arhatship on the moon
chain? Why or why not? On what level of unfoldment might those who
achieved arhatship upon the moon chain now be found? Speculate intelligently.
160. p. 583:
Of what nature was the great cataclysm which occurred at the end of the
third root-race and broke the race form?
161. p. 583:
Note that at the fulfillment of the number “3” the movement is usually
towards a state or plan characterized by the number “2”. However, the movement from the third
root-race is towards the fourth, and the movement from the third chain was to
the fourth chain. How do you explain
this?
162. p. 583:
In relation to the following the Tibetan invites our speculation: “On the second plane we have the Law of
Cohesion—love. On the second plane of
the manifesting Triad, the Law of Magnetic Control—love. Again lower down on the second plane of the
Personality, the Law of Love. The
accuracy of the analogy is quite interesting, and provides room for speculation”. What does He mean? Let us speculate.
163. p. 583:
Seek to draw an analogy between the third law of the system, the Law of
Disintegration and the third law of the soul, the Law of Service. Is there a connection other than
numerological?
164. p. 583:
See if you can explain the following analysis of the Law of Magnetic
Control: “This law is the basic law
controlling the Spiritual Triad. Through
this law, the force of evolution drives the Ego to progress through the cycle
of reincarnation back to union with his kind”?
Discuss the strength of the planes 2-4-6 relative to the strength of
planes 1-3-5-7 in our present solar system.
Discuss the analogy existing between the fact that the astral plane is
the major controlling plane within the personality and the Law of Magnetic
control (focusing upon the buddhic plane) is the basic law controlling the
Spiritual Triad (the higher correspondence of the personality). What does the Tibetan mean here by the word “Ego”? Is He suggesting the Solar Angel? In this regard, what does He mean by “one of
his kind”?
165. p. 583:
The following is a beautiful summary of the relationship between the
third and second aspects of divinity, and sheds much light upon the drama of
the discovery of human identity. Share
you response to reading it: “Through
separation he finds himself, and then—driven by the indwelling buddhic or
Christ principle—transcends himself, and finds himself again in all selves.”
166. p. 583:
Seek to draw an analogy between the fourth systemic law, the Law of
Magnetic Control, and the fourth law of the soul, the Law of Repulse? Is there a connection other than
numerological? Can you see a connection
between the Law of Magnetic Control and the second law of the soul, the Law of
Magnetic Impulse? If there is a
connection here, what is its basis?
167. p. 583:
Give your interpretation of the following anent the Law of Magnetic
Control: “This law holds the evolving
lower self in a coherent form. It
controls the Ego in the causal body, in the same way that the Logos controls
the Monad on the second plane”. What is
the meaning of the phrase, “the Ego in the causal body”? Is a structure being discussed or a state of
consciousness? Why?
168. p. 583:
What should the Law of Magnetic Control be considered the law of buddhic
plane.
169. p. 584:
Analyze the following definition of a Master and share your thoughts: “the Master is one Who can function on the
buddhic levels, and Who has magnetic control in the three worlds.” What is the relationship between the Master
and the atmic plane? Attempting to be
practical, how would you identify the effect of the buddhic levels upon the
three lower worlds?
170. p. 584:
Analyze the Law of Magnetic Control as “the demonstration, in the Triad,
of the Law of Attraction.”
171. p. 584:
Attempt to explain the following:
“It is the buddhic principle, and its relation with the lower permanent
atom of the Triad [that] is the mainspring of the life of the Ego.” What does the Tibetan mean by the “lower
permanent atom of the Triad”? Discuss
buddhi as life-giver.
172. p. 584:
Do any thoughts come to you when the Tibetan mentions “the placing of
the permanent atoms”?
173. p. 584:
Give your interpretation of: “
... it was this Law of Magnetic Control that effected the juncture of
astro-animal man, and the descending Monad, using the spark of mind as the
method of at-one-ment.” Discuss the
meaning of “astro-animal man”. Discuss
the relationship between the energy of Venus and the Law of Magnetic Control. Do you think Mercury could be allied to this
law? If so, in what way?
174. p. 584:
Give reasons why the Law of Magnetic Control must be amazingly important
at this juncture of the history of our planet.
175. p. 584:
Analyze the lines of least resistance found in the three systems of our
solar Logos. What ideas come to you?: 1) System I—Physical, mental, and atmic. The atmic was the highest point of
achievement in that system; 2) System II—Astral, buddhic, monadic; 3) System
III—Mental, atmic and logoic.
176. pp. 584-585: Discuss human evolution in terms of the
following: “The aim of human endeavour
is both to be controlled by this law, and like-wise to wield it in service.”
177. p. 585:
Discuss the transmutation and elevation of sex expression through the
wielding of the Law of Magnetic Control.
What are the implications of the following? “The love of all that breathes, and the
attraction that works out in service, is the same thing demonstrated in the
Triad. Sex expression, the coming
together of two, becomes transmuted into the coming together of many for acts
of service, which will give birth to new ideas, and to a new race—the
spiritual.”
178. p. 585:
What is the justification for the following: “Nine is the number of initiation, the number
of the adept, and of the man who functions in his buddhic vehicle.” Are there any other numbers associated with
the adept? If a Master of the Wisdom is
an adept, should nine be considered
the number of the Master, or a number
of the Master?
179. p. 585:
Give your ideas anent the achieving of harmony through control, “that
control entailing the knowledge of wisdom.”
180. p. 585:
Expand upon the following anent harmony:
“It is the harmony of similarity; it is the equilibrising of all through
the realisation of the laws of magnetism that produce co-ordination of the many
diverse into the one homogeneous; magnetism governs the synthesis of the many
aspects into a form of unity.” Relate
these words to the functioning of the principle of buddhi.
181. p. 585:
Whar are some implications of the following provocative thoughts: “ ... many who world on the fifth Ray pass
eventually to the fourth. In this system
the fifth Ray is of paramount importance in the development of all egos. Each must pass some time on it before
definitely remaining on his monadic Ray.”
What does the Tibetan mean by—“each must pass some time on it”? Simply that much time will be spent by each
ego upon the fifth subplane of the various lower planes? Or something else? Why does He jump to discussing the monadic
Ray instead of speaking of remaining upon his egoic Ray? Could this mean
that egoically all must spend time
upon the fifth subray of the ego before stabilizing on the monadic Ray?
182. p. 586:
What might the Tibetan mean by the following?: “ ... in this particular period of the fourth
round in the fourth chain, more time is spent on the fourth subplane by
evolving Egos than on any other”? Does
this mean that the Ego can be focussed upon the fourth subplane of the mental? Or does it mean something more subtle?
183. p. 586:
Does the following suggest the possession of a fourth ray mind?: “Many come into incarnation directly on to
this plane [the fourth subplane] and it is here that they begin to think
harmoniously”? Why or why not? Does coming into incarnation in this way
suggest a certain degree of development?
What does the word “directly” mean in this context?
184. p. 586:
Discuss the implications of the idea that the three lower laws of the
system “are all dominated and controlled eventually by the three higher laws in
the system—the Laws of Magnetic Control, of Disintegration and of Cohesion”? From this listing do you have an idea of
which higher law corresponds to which lower law and why? If we understood the three higher laws as
corresponding to the Spiritual Triad and the three lower laws as corresponding
to the human personality, how would we correlate these two sets of laws? Why is it that the Law of Vibration was left
out?
185. p. 586:
Give your interpretation of the following: “ ... the first law, that of Vibration, is
the controlling law of the six, demonstrating through the second law, that of
Cohesion, just as the solar Logos is at this time manifesting Himself through
His second aspect in this the second solar system.”
186. p. 586:
Note that although the third ray was most important during System I, our
solar Logos has no third ray ruling the higher two of His three periodical
vehicles. Note also, that although the
first ray will be most important during our solar Logos’ third system, System
III, the Logos has no first ray ruling the higher two of His periodical
vehicles. What possibilities exist
concerning the personality ray of the solar Logos in each of the three systems? How are such possibilities reflected in the
personality ray of the our solar Logos during our present solar system?
187. pp. 586-587: Read the long footnote concerning the Three
Outpourings. Refer to the chart on p. 94. Essentialize in your own words the
information given and state what you have learned. What new implications, if any, dawn as you
read? Why are the symbols of the three
Aspects or three Logoi placed “outside of time and space, and only the streams
of influence from them descend into our system of planes.” What do you think of the possibility of three
super-cosmic/physical subplanes upon which these three aspects of the Logos are
focussed essentially? Why do you suppose
the First Outpouring proceeds vertically downwards? What is the meaning of this method of
procedure? Although the First Outpouring
relates most to the third aspect of divinity do you see anything of the first
aspect in the method of procedure? What
planet or planets may be involved in the dynamics of the First Outpouring? Why do you think the Second Outpouring
proceeds in an oval manner and reascends after reaching the lowest point? Discuss the role of form builder in this descent and reascent. Why too, is the Third Outpouring pictured as
pursuing an oval course? What is the
rationale for saying that the Third Outpouring “is in no way clouded by the
matter through which it passes, but retains its virgin purity and splendour
untarnished”, unlike the other outpourings?
Why does the Third Outpouring descend no lower than the buddhic plane? Can you find any tabulations concerning the
solar Logos which demonstrate this halting?
Interpret the following: “ ... the
link between the two [the two outpourings] is formed by a triage in a circle,
representing the individual soul or man—the reincarnating ego. Here the triangle is contributed by the third
outpouring and the circle by the second.”
What is the meaning of the circle and
the triangle and the fact that they
are contributed by different outpourings.
In answering this dwell upon the structure and dynamics of the causal
body.
188. p. 586:
Do you think the term “All-self” on the bottom of this page refers to
the Universal All-Self or to the solar Logos considered as the One Self of all
contained within the bounds of a solar system, and upon still higher levels
connected with the solar Logos? Why?
189. p. 587:
In the following the Tibetan seems to offer information discrepant with
that given in the footnote by Leadbeater.
Is there a way to reconcile these two points of view: “The first ray of Will or Power is the first
aspect of the All-self, and in the third outpouring, came down to the fifth
plane, along with the other monads.” Did
the Logos descend to the fifth subplane or only as far as the fourth? Why? Explain
the descent of the monads along with the first aspect of the Logos during the
Third Outpouring.
190. p. 587.
What light can you throw upon the following: “A subtle correspondence exists between the
monads of Will on the fifth plane, the fifth law, and the fifth Ray”. In what way are the Monads of Will associated
with the fifth plane and with the Law of Fixation? Elucidate the important difference in
relationship which the fifth Ray holds with the first Ray and with the second
Ray.
191. p. 587:
Can you explain the modus operandi of the following?” “The third Ray which is the Activity aspect,
controls the Laws of Disintegration and of Death on the third and seventh
planes”? How do these two laws form a
group? What might be the dynamics of
their interaction?
192. p. 587:
Give your rationale for the following:
“Ray 1, Planes 1 and 5, and the Laws of Fixation and Vibration, form one
interlocking whole.” Can you explain the
manner of the interlocking and the ways in which this whole might function?
193. pp. 587-588: The Tibetan offers an explanation for why the
Power ray controls on only two planes; the Love Ray upon three planes, and the
Activity Ray, again, upon two planes. Can
you find any references in Esoteric Psychology, Vol. I, in which the three lower kingdoms of
nature are discussed in relation to the rays ruling them and an important
analogy can be found?
194. p. 588:
How does the distribution of Rays and the planes they rule suggest both
methods of Ray -transfer from Rays of
Attribute to Rays of Aspect, but, as well, the ways in which the Techniques of
Fusion (see Esoteric Psychology, Vol. II) should be used by those on the
Rays of Attribute?
195. p. 588:
Attempt to elucidate the following:
“Ray three, the dominant Ray of the system which is past, its synthetic
Ray, controls on two planes and on one that is little understood, for, just as
the physical body is not considered a principle, so there is a sphere of
activity that is not included in our enumeration, it is past and gone. Some explanation of this lies hid in the
occult words, ‘The Eighth Sphere’”. As
planes are sphere, do you think that the Eighth Sphere refers to a systemic
plane, invisible to us, lower than
even the dense physical plane? Or does
this term refer to the dense physical plane, which in this solar system is
considered a remnant and not a
principle? Or does the term refer to the
lower mental plane considered as a separated unit? What do you think?
196. p. 588:
Why, do you suppose, are the four Rays of Attribute so influential in
the three worlds of normal human evolution at this time? What can you say about the “subtle and
peculiar manner” in which these four rays control the four lower kingdoms of
nature—mineral, vegetable, animal and human ... ”? Is there any respect in which the four Rays
of Attribute can be considered lunar while
the three Rays of Aspect can be considered solar?
197. p. 588:
What does it mean that “the fourth Ray and the fourth Kingdom form a
point of harmony for the lower three, and all four then pass into the major or
upper three”? Why does the Tibetan
consider this so worthy of “serious thought”?
198. p. 588:
What rationale can you give for the fact that the door into the fifth or
spiritual kingdom (i.e., the Door of Initiation) was opened during the fourth rootrace?
199. p. 588:
Give your thoughts about how the following happened: “the fourth rootrace also developed the
astral capacity that made contact with the fourth or buddhic level possible.” What sort of astral capacity is needed for
such contact? How can numerology help us
understand this problem?
200. p. 589:
It is easy to see the correlation between ray seven and the mineral
world. What ideas come to you when you
read that it also controls “ ... in the final stages of involutionary life at
the point where the upward turn of evolution is made”? At what turns
does modern human civilization find itself?
How can the presence of the seventh ray assist in making such turns or,
more generally, transitions?
201. p. 589:
Why does the influence of the seventh Ray enter at all important points
of transition? Is the atomic plane of
each plane a point of transition? What
is the significance of considering the atomic subplane the seventh subplane as
well as the first?
202. p. 589:
Discuss ray seven as “the reflection on the physical plane of the Power
and Activity Aspects working in synthesis.”
203. p. 589:
What will be the effect of the presence of the Avatar of Synthesis simultaneously
with the growth in power of the seventh ray?
How do Capricorn and the ray energies which pass through this
constellation fit in with the present human and planetary situation?
204. p. 589:
Give your rationale for the idea that the sixth Ray of Devotion “has a
definite though little known connection with the vegetable kingdom.”
205. p. 589:
The following presents a tremendously important description of the
interactions between the human and deva kingdoms. What implications occur to you? “It is in the vegetable kingdom that we find
one of the first and temporary approximations between the evolving human Monad,
and the evolving deva Monad. The two
parallel evolutions touch in that kingdom, and then again follow their own
paths, finding their next point of contact on the fourth or buddhic level, and
a final merging on the second.” What can
be inferred anent human and deva contact during the third and fifth rootraces,
as compared with the fourth and sixth? In
what way would the seventh rootrace fit into a category all its own? In studying the vegetable kingdom do you
notice anything to confirm what D.K. has said here? What do you suppose the “final merging” on
the monadic plane will bring for devas and humans? What has the idea of the “Divine
Hermaphrodite” to do with this merging? What
is accomplished within a Heavenly Man when the merging occurs?
206. p. 590:
Discuss the deva and human evolutions as the negative and positive poles
respectively of “the divine hermaphroditic Man”. What beneficial effects do the deva and human
hierarchies have upon each other? Discuss
this in terms of the rays.
207. p. 590:
What are the implications of the fact that humanity forms the masculine
aspect of the Divine Hermaphrodite and the devas the feminine aspect? How might practical day to day life within
the human family be affected by this situation?
208. p. 590:
The devas are more associated with the abstract Rays and yet they work on concrete faculty. Human
beings are more associated with the concrete
Rays and yet they work on the abstract
qualities. What thoughts come to you
as you contemplate this situation?
209. p. 590:
What are the “three points on the path of evolution at which the Monads
of Love, working on the abstract qualities touch the devas of activity working
on concrete faculty”?
210. p. 590:
Offer your rationale for the following:
“The perfection of the two evolutions [deva and human] marks the point
of attainment of the divine Heavenly Man; it is the perfecting of the two major
centres, creative activity and love, of the Logos”. Which two chakras may be indicated by the
phrase “two major centres”? Does it make
sense that Man is sometimes associated with the solar plexus center? (See Tabulation IV, p. 565.) What is the rationale for associating the
devas with creative activity and man with love?
Are there any apparent contradictions in this association? Contrast the combined relationship of man and
deva as, first, solar plexus and sacral centers, and then, later, as heart and
throat centers. Does it mean anything to
you that the sum of petals for the first combination is 16 or 10+6, and sum of
the petals for the second combination is 28 or 12+16? In System III, man and deva will combine to
complete the head centers of the Logos. Will
this involve crown center and ajna center, or some other combination, do you
think? What is a good rationale for
thinking that man and deva will work far more closely together in System III
than in System II? (Remember that the
two kingdoms merge upon the monadic plane).
211. p. 590:
We learn that with the completion of the head centers in System III, “our
Logos [will have] triumphed, and measured up to the sixth cosmic Initiation,
just as He should measure up in this system to the fourth”. See if you can find the reference which
states that our Logos develops though nine initiations and that the third
cosmic Initiation is His present goal. What
to you think the term “measure up” means?
Will our Logos take His fourth cosmic Initiation in this solar system? What is the justification for thinking that
He took the second cosmic Initiation (that which is the goal of our Heavenly
Man) in System I?
212. p. 590:
In what way does it make sense to you that the Ray of Concrete Science “is
the Ray that governs the merging of [the animal] kingdom into the human”? Upon what chain and in what round of that
chain was Venus when it stimulated the process which eventuated in the
mentalization of Earth’s animal man?
213. p. 590:
To what extent do you believe that some higher correspondence of the Law
of Sacrifice governs the relationship of Venus to our Earth?
214. p. 590:
What does the Tibetan expect us to gain if we study the analogy which
exists between the fifth Ray, the fifth Law of Fixation, the fifth Venusian
round, and the fifth root-race? What
profit do you gather from such a consideration?
215. p. 590:
Why is it justifiable to sum up the three laws of the personality as “The
Law of Rebirth and Death in the three worlds”?
216. p. 590:
Elucidate the following: “The
fifth law governs a fixed point in the personality, that of the fifth
principle.”
217. p. 591:
Of what sorts of energies is the astral body meant, eventually, to be an
expression? What type of alignment will
make this possible?
218. p. 591:
Why are the numbers 6-4-2 associated with “starting points for fresh
endeavor in the life of the evolving Monad ...”? Connect this idea with the three initiations
associated with these numbers—the second, fourth and sixth.
219. p. 591:
Attempt to explain how it is that the Law of Fixation finds its greater
correspondence in the Law of Karma on cosmic mental levels. Analyze in this respect the following: “‘As a man thinks, so is he’; according to
his thoughts are his desires and acts, and so results the future. He fixes for himself the resultant karma.”
220. p. 591: Discuss the two reasons why the word “Fixation”
is chosen in relation to this law. How
does the first ray enter the process of shaping one’s destiny? What has this law to do with achieving
stabilisation?
221. p. 591:
Offer your interpretation of the implications and ramifications of the
following: The Law of Fixation “is the
law under which the evolving personality builds up, during the course of many
lives, the causal body; it fixes the matter inhering in that body, placed there
by the man as the ages slip away, and crystallizes it. Before the fourth Initiation the
crystallization is complete, and the inevitable shattering that is the result
of crystallisation in all forms, takes place, setting the indwelling life free
for further progress”. What connection
does the Law of Fixation have to the process of crystallization and why? What is the process, do you suppose, by which
the matter which is meant to inhere within the causal body is fixed there? What connection have the combination of
Vulcan, Venus and Saturn to the execution of this Law?
222. p. 592:
Dwell upon the concept of the “causal body of the race”. Speculate upon the nature of such a structure. Is it simply an aggregate or does it have a
synthesizing structure?
223. p. 592:
Discuss the Law of Fixation as the law which “governs the
crystallization of all forms prior to their shattering in the process of
evolution”. How might this law cooperate
with the Law of Disintegration?
224. p. 592:
Discuss the Law of Fixation as the law which “governs the time of rebirth, being one of the
subsidiary branches of the Law of Karma”.
What rationale can you conceive for the Law of Fixation being a
subsidiary of the Law of Karma? What
rays and or stellar beings can link these two laws? Consider the Law of Karma as cosmic Law of
Fixation at that which controls the lesser, systemic Law of Fixation.
225. p. 592:
We learn from the Tibetan that “each of the seven subsidiary laws is
linked to one of the cosmic laws, or with the Sirian Law of Karma”. If you were to undertake to link the seven,
how would you do so and what would be your justification?
226. p. 592:
Discuss the following fundamental analogy: We need always to remember that the
consciousness of the cosmic mental plane is the logoic goal of attainment, and
that the Sirian Logos is to our solar Logos what the human Ego is to the
personality”.
227. p. 592:
Discuss the Law of Fixation in relation to the Law of Cleavage. Consider these laws in relation to the
Judgment Day during the fifth round.
228. p. 592:
Discuss the manner in which Monads may pass from a state of being
dominated by the Law of Fixation into a state in which the Law of Magnetic
Control prevails. What would such a
transition look like in the realm of normal human experience?
229. p. 592:
Note the particular use of the word “mahamanvantara” on this page. What time period do you think it indicates in
this context? Do you think those two
fifths which are set back as incapable of further development on the Earth will
have to wait until another globe, another round, another chain or another
scheme is the focal interest of the planetary Logos? Which of these, do you think?
230. p. 592:
Who, in this context, are the “Lords of the Flame”? What other names for these beings exist? How do the Lords of the Flame wield the Law
of Fixation to control the three worlds?
231. pp. 592-593: There are some profoundly important
implications in relation to the following statement. Which implications occur to you? “ ... Venus is the sixth planet (esoterically
the second), and is in her fifth round, and hence is ahead of us along every
line.” The direction of counting is
all-important for one direction is occult and esoteric and the other is
mystical. It is not easy to determine
which is which, however. For instance,
do you think that Venus holds place in relation to the logoic heart, or more in
relation to the logoic quaternary, as the logoic solar plexus center, perhaps?
232. p. 593:
What is meant by the idea that the Law of Fixation “demonstrates the
static quality of love ... ”?
233. p. 593:
Speculate upon how the Law of Fixation might function upon the
involutionary path in relation to the permanent atoms.
234. p. 593:
Contrast the roles of the building devas and the Jivas.
235. p. 593:
Give the developmental essentials, as you see them, of “Love in the
Personality, Love in the Ego and Love in the Monad”. Share your ideas upon the following: “Love in the Personality is love in the three
worlds; love in the Ego is love in the solar system, and all that it contains;
whilst love in the Monad demonstrates a measure of cosmic love, and embraces
much that is outside the solar system altogether.”
236. p. 594:
On this page we find an amazing paragraph discussing the powers of love. Read it carefully and share your ideas. What have you learned? Some particular questions to consider are: How is it that love keeps all in ordered
sequence? How does love perfect all that
is? Why is love the “key to the deva
kingdom, and the reason of the blending of the two kingdoms eventually into
the divine Hermaphrodite.” How does love
work differently through the concrete rays and the abstract rays?
237. p. 594:
Speculate upon the nature of a solar system (System I) in which “Desire
for Expression and the Impulse to Move
was the basic note”. What is at the root
of this “Impulse to Move”? How does it work
out in our present solar system? How
does it work out in your own life?
238. pp. 594-595: Share what you believe to be the implications
of the following: “Ordered Activity is
the foundation of this system of ordered Love, and leads to system three,
wherein ordered Activity, with ordered Love for its impulse, results in ordered
loving Power”.
239. p. 595:
The following statement deserves pondering. What ideas come to you as you do so?: “The astral plane is, at the present time,
the most important for us, for in desire—not corrected or transmuted—lies the
difference between the personal consciousness and that of the Ego.” What, in essence, are the characteristics of
the personal consciousness which differentiate it so markedly from that of the
Ego? What kind of planetary contrast is
here implied?
240. p. 595.
Consider the following: “In the
sixth Scheme, that of Venus, this can be seen clearly; it is the scheme of love. Viewed from one angle, the Venusian Scheme is
the second, and from another it is the sixth.
It depends upon whether we reason from the circumference to the centre
or the reverse.” What point is D.K. seeking
to make? Why does He want us to consider
Venus in relation to the number six? What
are the two angles of vision here discussed?
Assuming that one is occult and one is mystical, with which of these two
does reasoning from the circumference to the center correlate? With which does reasoning from the center to
the circumference correlate? The Tibetan
is here using numbers according to some inner pattern, for Venus is the third planetary scheme from the Sun (literally the
center to the periphery) if we include Vulcan, and we would have to begin with
Uranus as the periphery and count towards the center in order to assign the
number six to Venus. So obviously a
pattern that is not strictly literal is
being used. What do you think is the
basis of this pattern which assigns the numbers six and two to Venus?
241. p. 595:
Share your view on the following profoundly important statement anent
Venus: “It is the home of the planetary
Logos of the sixth Ray.” What, in this
context, does the word “home” mean? Is
there any way to escape the implication that one of the rays of Venus (whether
of the personality, soul or monad) is the sixth Ray? If the sixth Ray is definitely influencing
one of the periodical vehicles of Venus, what are the implications in terms of
solar systemic structure? What do you
think the Tibetan is hinting at when He says that “we must remember the
interlocking, the gradual shifting and changing, that takes place in time on
all Rays”. Is the Tibetan suggesting
that a ray shift has been taking
place in the Venus scheme?
242. p. 596:
Along the same line, see if you can throw any light on the following: “ ... the Earth chain is the third if viewed
from one aspect and the fifth viewed from another”. Note that the word being used here is chain and not scheme. Find the section in this book which discusses the
appearance and disappearance of chains in a scheme (their objectification and
obscuration) and see if these thoughts indicate a way that thought may proceed. We must find a way to avoid the obvious
contradiction which comes when we realize that the Earth chain is constantly
referred to as the fourth chain in
the Earth scheme. There is also the
possibility that the word chain and scheme are occasionally used
interchangeably as an occult blind, just as the words solar system and
constellation occasionally are. In
attempting to answer this question check the tabulations and charts of chains
and schemes for guidance.
243. p. 596:
Consider all the many sixes discussed in the first paragraph, and share
what new learnings or awarenesses come to you.
Recollect that the sixth deva Hierarchy on Venus was deeply affected at
the time of the individualisation of Man, and that a Venusian chain, probably
the sixth, received an important gift from the Earth at that time.
244. p. 596:
What can we expect anent the “shattered form of the fifth subrace of the
fifth rootrace”? What sort of shattering? When?
245. p. 596:
Recollect the decanate rulers of Aquarius and see if you can determine
the approximate era when the sixth subrace of the fifth rootrace will truly
emerge.
246. p. 596:
How will the Law of Fixation aid in the emergence of the sixth subrace
of the fifth root race?
247. p. 596:
Give your ideas on “the connection that always exists between the atmic
and the physical plane.”
248. p. 596:
In what ways are the Law of Disintegration and the Law of Sacrifice and
Death similar? In what was is one of
them subsidiary to the other?
249. p. 596:
With respect to the Law of Sacrifice and Death, note how the Tibetan
divides this law into the Law of Sacrifice and the Law of Death. What does He mean by the following? “The Law of Sacrifice is the Law of Death in
the subtle bodies, whilst what we call death is the analogous thing in the
physical body.”
250. p. 596:
Given our understanding of the Law of Sacrifice and Death, why should
the seventh Ray, particularly, be associated with this law?
251. p. 597:
What interpretation can you give to the following highly occult
statements: “In a mysterious way this
law [the Law of Sacrifice and Death] is the reverse side of the first, or the
Law of Vibration. It is Vulcan and
Neptune in opposition, which is as yet an almost incomprehensible thing for us.” Are Vulcan and Neptune to be taken literally here or qualitatively? Which planet is associated with which law and
why? Discuss the two forms of synthesis
represented by the two laws and by the two planets.
252. p. 597:
Share your thoughts on the following:
“ ... the rays, schemes, planets, chains, rounds, races and laws form a
unit; seen from the angle of human vision the confusion seems unimaginable, and
the key of its solution to be so hidden as to be useless; yet, seen from the
angle of logoic sight, the whole moves in unison, and is geometrically
accurate.”
253. p. 598:
How would you discriminate between a round and a world period?
254. p. 598:
On this page D.K. seeks to impress us with the “wonderful beauty” and “gorgeousness
of the design”. Do you have any greater
sense of what D.K. calls the “the divine magnitude of the scheme with its
magnificent intricacies”? In what ways
have you been impressed or not impressed?
Have you been helped in any way?
255. p. 598:
In what way is the Ray upon which we are found a limitation to the
comprehensiveness of our sight?
256. p. 598:
In your own words seek to explain the nature and purpose of the
Principle of Mutation. What is the
relationship between the Law of Cycles and the Principle of Mutation?
257. p. 598:
D.K. states that “we can rest assured that there is some fundamental
principle directing all the activities of the Logos in His system, and by
wrestling to discover the basic principle on which our microcosmic lives rest,
we may discover aspects of this inherent logoic principle.” What do you think He means by “the basic
principle on which our microcosmic lives rest ... ”?
258. p. 599:
Why are the fourth, fifth and seventh rounds considered major rounds?
259. p. 599:
If the “seventh is a major round because it will mark the merging of the
two evolutions, the human and the deva”, and we know as well that the deva and
human evolutions merge upon the monadic plane, what can we hypothesize about
the spiritual focus of human life in the seventh round? Why?
260. p. 599:
What rationale is there for considering the third, fifth and seventh
root-races to be more important than all the others? It is assumed that the choice of these three
focusses on the present fourth round.
261. p. 599:
When the term “Monads of Love” is used do you believe that it refers to all Monads or only to those focussed
upon the second Ray?
262. p. 600:
Why are the three major rays considered the first, second and seventh?
Why not the third? In what sense can it be said that these three
major rays are dual? What is the relationship between the
Mahachohan and the seventh Ray? Does the
move of Master R. from the seventh Ray to the third Ray (with a number of His
disciples) seem worthy of consideration here?
When did this transfer take place?
263. p. 600:
Why, on a solar systemic level should the seventh Ray be important for the present?
264. p. 600:
Study carefully the closing tabulation on p. 600? What do you learn? Why is it said of the four subsidiary rays
that they are “converging on the fifth”?
When the major Rays are given, is this equivalent to given the major
planetary schemes? The planetary Lords
are often considered Ray Lords, and further, nothing about the schemes is
mentioned. From a study of the
tabulation, what would you say about the criticalness or non-criticalness of
humanity’s present position (in both time and space) within the solar system? Do you think that this tabulation applies to all planetary schemes within our solar
system or only to the Earth scheme? Look
carefully, and speculate as to why the tabulation might not, for instance,
apply to Venus. Manvantaras are often
considered equivalent to rounds, but in this tabulation we see that they are not equivalent. To what might the word “manvantara” refer in
this tabulation? Why is the fourth
initiation considered so major for humanity, but not seen of such great
importance if viewed from a level of attainment higher than the human?
(end of Section 3)