Study Questions for
A Treatise on Cosmic Fire
Fourth Semester - Section 1
A
Treatise on Cosmic Fire, pp. 378‑417
I. Manas and the Earth Chain
1. p.
379: Please explain how, in your
opinion, the principle of "numerical resonance" works.
2. p.
379: The Tibetan speaks of a certain
vitalized systemic triangle of which Venus and the Earth are two points. What do you suppose is the third point of the
triangle and why?
3. p.
379: What, in your opinion, is
"logoic kundalini"? Do you
think it has a particular point of origin or "residence" within our
solar system? If so, what and why?
4. p.
379: What has the stimulation of manas
in our chain to do with the coming of the Solar Angels?
5. p.
379: The Tibetan speaks of the
individualisation of those within the human Hierarchy who "form a
particular centre in the body of the planetary Logos"? Do you think He is speaking of all members of
the human Hierarchy? Or just certain
units? Of which center do you think He
may be speaking and why?
6. p.
379: What is an ego and why is it called
an ego?
7. p.
379: The term "world period"
is an interesting and somewhat ambiguous one.
What do you think the meaning of "world period" is as the term
is used on this page.
8. p.
379: A certain group of units within the
fourth Creative Hierarchy received manasic stimulation upon the Moon Chain.
What thoughts come to you as you read the following with respect to this group:
"The last named group can be seen incarnating in all those who tread the
Probationary Path, who are counted as advanced units of the race, and
considered the notables among men. Owing
to the difference between the two groups may be traced much of the world
unrest".
9. p.
380: Consider the two groups within the
fourth Creative Hierarchy. Which centers in a Heavenly Man do each of them
form? Why? What does it actually mean for such groups to
form or constitute such centers?
10. p. 380:
Comment on the differing methods of individualization of the two groups
of humanity.
11. p. 380:
Offer your interpretation of the idea that "in each chain the
planetary Logos takes a different initiation". What is the relationship between a chain and
a center within the planetary Logos?
What initiation do you suppose the planetary Logos is taking in this our
fourth chain? Why?
12. p. 380:
What do you suppose is the connection between an certain kind of
initiation of our planetary Logos and the emergence into manifestation of
certain kinds of lesser entities? What
has such manifestation to do with the process of planetary initiation?
13. p. 380:
Give your interpretation of Pope's statement, "The proper study of
mankind, is man" with respect to the vast cycles which the Tibetan is
discussing. What of significance
concerning mankind might the study of such cycles reveal?
14. p. 380:
What thoughts come to you as you read and interpret the paragraphs
setting forth the "cosmic angle" of approach to the study of vast
cycles? Some questions to answer: What
is extra‑systemic psychology? Is
the term "vast arc of the heavens" figurative or literal? What are "circulating attendants"
and why are they called "attendants"?
Does every entity have a "polar opposite"? Why will all this be revealed only
"during the final part of the next round"? How many millions of years away do you
suppose that time is?
15. pp. 380‑381: What thoughts come to you as you read and
interpret the paragraph setting forth the "systemic angle" of
approach to the study of vast cycles?
Some questions to answer: Why does the Tibetan use the term
"rational interdependence" when speaking of the Heavenly Men? What
does it mean that Heavenly Men receive logoic force in "dual
formation"? What of an occult
nature might the "astronomical and orbital relation of the Sun to the
planets" reveal? What is a planet's
"polarity"? Do you think the
Tibetan is suggesting here that facts anent the polarity of planets is revealed
to initiates of the third degree? If,
yes, at this point, why?
16. p. 381:
From reading A Treatise on Comic Fire do you gather the
impression that this book has a particular resonance with the number five?
Why or why not?
17. p. 381:
What, do you suppose, may be the value of understanding systematic information
concerning "a: the vitalisation
of the schemes; b: interaction
between two schemes; c: the periods
of incarnation of a planetary Logos on the physical plane; d: the initiation of the planetary Logos"?
18. p. 381:
What thoughts come to you as you read and interpret the paragraph
setting forth the "planetary angle" of approach to the vast cycles
which concern man? Some questions to
consider: Why should a Heavenly Man be called a Heavenly Man? Are chains
centers within a planetary Logos or are globes centers? How many chain triangles can be formed
within a planetary system of seven chains?
Are individual chains the object of stimulation from a planetary Logos
or are triangles of chains, or both?
Which chains within our scheme do you think are presently receiving
stimulation? What does it mean that certain
chains or triangles of chains could be "the sphere of incarnation of a
planetary Logos"? What, in such a
case, is incarnation? Give your interpretation of the phrase
"emerging into captivity" from a planetary perspective.
19. p. 382:
Although even the planetary point of view involves, according to the
Tibetan, an expansion of consciousness unattainable by man, are you willing to
endeavor to comprehend such things? Why
or why not?
20. p. 382:
What thoughts come to you as you read and interpret the paragraph
setting forth the "chain angle" of approach to the greater cycles
which concern man? Some questions for
consideration: What is the meaning of "the gloves as seen in time"?
Is there another way to see them?
Do you believe that globes are equivalent to the seven principles of a
chain or are they something other? Why
or why not? Is the fourth globe of our
Earth Chain merely physical, or does it have its own higher principles? Why or why not? What does it mean that our planetary Logos
"embodies in totality the chain and the scheme"?
21. p. 382:
Why should a scheme correspond to the Monad? What is the "monadic auric
egg"? What is its purpose? Of which forty‑nine cycles of a human
being is the Tibetan speaking?
Monadic? Egoic? Are such cycles related to root races or sub‑races? Why or why not? Does a Scheme also have forty nine
cycles? If so, what do you think they
are?
22. p. 382: Why should a chain correspond to the
"body egoic of a human being"?
What, in your opinion, are the "seven great cycles" of the
ego? To what our circumstances or time
periods do you believe they relate?
23. p. 382: Consider the footnote on this page
and bring forward any insights which occur to you as you read about the nature
of the globes of a chain and the relationships of the parallel globes to each
other. Do you believe that the highest
globes of all planets are found upon the higher mental plane? Upon what other levels might they be found?
Analyze the possible positions if a chain were tenfold or twelve-fold? Which of these numbers do you consider more
likely? Why? Read in this paragraph what is said about the
"densest physical matter".
Does what is said suggest a purely physical globe D or one that has
higher principles?
24. p. 383:
Do you believe that a globe has seven races or forty‑nine? What is there to suggest that each globe has
its various races? Do you believe that
the unit man experiences racial incarnations on all the globes of a scheme or only on one or some? What thought can you bring in support of your
point of view? In answering this
question look closely into the nature and structure of a round.
25. p. 383:
In the life of a human being, what might be meant by a "particular
series of incarnations"? Are you
presently in a particular series of incarnation of a certain nature? Please describe.
26. p. 383:
Do you think there are seven egoic cycles or forty‑nine?
27. p. 383:
Give your interpretation of incarnations by the discarnate.
28. p. 383:
If a physical globe corresponds
to a "particular physical incarnation", what hint do you find
concerning whether or not a physical globe has higher principles?
29. p. 383:
Why does the Tibetan refer to the "midget, man"? How do you feel about this terminology?
30. p. 383:
From all the above numerical figures (sevens and forty‑nines) how
many incarnations do you believe a planetary Logos has? What are you calling an incarnation? Please explain your answer carefully. In all this examine the number
"343" closely; what significance does its numerological sum suggest
to you?
31. p. 383:
Elaborate upon buddhi as "corporate action".
32. p. 383:
Give your interpretation of the following: "In the case of a
planetary Logos, the cells in His body are evolutionary lives (deva and human
units) animated by the life of the second Logos, co‑operating with the
first Logos, and utilising the activities of the third Logos for purposes of
manifesting." What does it mean to
you that human and deva units are animated by the life of the second Logos?
33. p. 383:
The Tibetan states that because of the information given on pp. 382‑383
the "place of the Earth chain and globe play in the evolution of the
planetary Logos of the Earth scheme should be clearer to the
student". Is it clearer to
you? How so?
34. p. 383:
We are often told that the "wheel turns". What does this statement mean to you? What do you think it means that as that wheel
turns it "sweeps into objectivity one of its seven globes"? Does anything about this statement strike you
as unusual? Do you think that all globes
of a scheme are eventually swept into objectivity, or only one?
35. p. 384:
Consider well the usual diagram by means of which a scheme, its chains
and globes are represented. Do you think
this representation has any literal basis in reality? In what ways do you think the diagram is a
fairly faithful representation of the facts?
In what way do you think the facts are different from the way the
diagram represents the case?
36. p. 384:
For what particular reasons do you believe the ego is unable to express
the entire content of egoic consciousness through the physical body and
brain? Carry the analogy to a Heavenly
Man in relation to his physical globe.
What implications does this fact have for life upon our physical globe?
37. p. 384:
When a planetary Logos is not in physical incarnation does it
necessarily mean that the physical globe of his lowest chain does not
exist? Please explain.
38. p. 384:
Please offer your interpretation of the following: "The planetary
Logos "is midway through his career upon the cosmic Path of Initiation,
and consequently is to take the fourth initiation in this chain. Well may this
globe, therefore, be considered the globe of sorrow and of pain, for through it
our planetary Logos is undergoing that which the mystic calls the
'Crucifixion'".
39. p. 384:
Is Sanat Kumara passing through an initiation presently? Which?
What correlation does this fact have with the Initiation of the
Planetary Logos? Which Initiation has
the planetary Logos of Venus recently undergone? Are there any hints regarding this? Is there an analogy between the relationship
of the Christ and the Master Jesus and their initiatory level at the time of
the crucifixion of Jesus, and the initiatory levels of the planetary Logos of
Venus and our planetary Logos? Can you
find references which relate Venus to the number "six" and to buddhi?
40. p. 384:
If the planetary Logos is undergoing the fourth initiation in this our
Earth chain, why is the dense physical globe so important? Why must the fourth initiation be undergone through this dense globe?
41. p. 384:
We are told that during this "world period" the cells of the
planetary Logos are "rent by pain and suffering". What is the purpose of the rending process? What is the meaning of "world
period" in this particular context?
For what duration do you believe the planetary Logos is undergoing the
fourth initiation?
42. p. 384:
Give your interpretation of the "capacity to suffer" in
relation to the information in paragraph "c".
43. p. 384:
Read the following carefully then attempt to answer the questions which
pertain to it: "The solar Logos has for objective nine initiations, the
third cosmic Initiation being His goal.
Our planetary Logos has for objective seven initiations, the second
cosmic Initiation being His goal. Man
has for objective five initiations, the first cosmic Initiation being his
goal".
Is
the fifth initiation of man the first cosmic Initiation? Why or why not? Is there anything to suggest in this section
that a number of secondary initiations exist between cosmic Initiations? What sort of initiation is the fourth
Initiation which the planetary Logos is in process of taking upon this
chain? It cannot be a cosmic initiation,
correct? What contra‑indicates the
idea that the seventh human initiation is the second Cosmic Initiation? In all this paragraph do you think there is a
difference between the terms "objective" and "goal"? Why or why not? At what point of human attainment do you
believe the first of the seven initiations which lie before the planetary Logos
begins? Is there any reason to believe
that any of the seven initiations which are the objective for the planetary
Logos overlap with any of the nine initiations which are the objective of the
solar Logos? Is there any reason to
believe that these initiations do not overlap?
44. p. 385:
See Chart VII. Examine carefully
the diagram of the Earth Scheme. What do
you learn from comparing the geometry of each chain? What do you make of the fact that the
structure of the fourth chain is very similar (through not an exact replica) to
the general structure of the fourth scheme?
Notice that there are four lines emanating from the center of the Earth
Scheme leading to the Mars Scheme, the Venus Scheme, the Vulcan Scheme, the
Jupiter Scheme and the Mercury Scheme.
What may be the meaning of such lines and why emanating from the
center? Why are there not lines
extending towards the Saturn and Neptune Schemes? Notice the unnamed line extending from the
Venus Scheme? Whither, do you
think? Notice the dark‑lined
triangle extending from the Mercury globe of the Earth Chain to the Mercury
globe of the Venus Chain to the Mercury Globe of the Mercury Chain? What do you think? Notice that globes three, five and seven form
the inner triplicity of the Earth Chain and are linked by a dark‑lined
triangle? Why do you think so? Notice particularly the arrangement of the
globes for each chain. Some are numbered
and specifically placed; some are not.
What do you learn from this placement?
What do dotted lines mean when compared to dark lines? Notice particularly the three dense lines
extending from globe six of the Venus Chain to the second, fourth and sixth
globes of the Earth Chain. What are the
meaning of these lines? Why are globes
one and four, and gloves two and six connected by dense lines forming a
cross. What do you make of the inscribed
pentagram within the Venus Chain? Why
does the line to the Vulcan Scheme pass straight through the center of the Mars
Chain? For students of Occult
Chemistry, do the shapes by means of which the various chains are
represented bear any similarly to any of the shapes by means of which the
chemical elements are represented? What
if anything occurs to you as you contemplate the order or the chains within the
Earth Scheme—Neptune, Venus, Saturn, Earth, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter? Is this order meaningful or meaningless? How so?
Why is the Moon Chain missing from this enumeration? What mystery could be concealed by its
absence?
45. p. 386:
What significance do you see in the fact that the Venus Chain of the
Earth Scheme is number two whereas the Mars Chain is number six?
46. p. 386:
If the "definitely human family became present upon earth" at
some time during the third root‑race, what representations of humanity
were present before that, and why were such beings not definitely human?
47. p. 386:
What hints exists on this page to instruct you that the chains of a
scheme exist simultaneously and do not appear sequentially?
48. p. 386:
We are told here that the advent of great Entities from the Venus Chain
"signalised the taking of a physical vehicle by the planetary Logos, and
was literally the coming of the Avatar".
What does "taking" a physical vehicle mean? Which Avatar and why?
49. p. 386:
Please give your interpretation of the following: "... the
planetary Logos did not come from the Venus scheme but from the Venus chain of
His own scheme, the Earth scheme".
What does the coming of the
planetary Logos mean, and what does it have to do with the coming of Sanat
Kumara?
50. p. 387:
What, do you suppose, is the other point of the systemic triangle of
which two points are the Earth and Venus?
51. p. 387:
Consider what was said anent cosmic Initiations a few pages ago and then
discuss the "minor initiation" which our Heavenly Man was enabled to
take due to the alignment of the systemic triangle herein discussed and the
"major initiation" for which He is in preparation. Do you think that the fourth initiation of
the Planetary Logos discussed on p. 384 is considered a minor initiation? Or is the
minor initiation discussed something different?
Is it possible that initiations which are minor and major are numbered
differently in the case of men and logoi?
52. p. 387:
Which "major initiation" was taken by the Venusian planetary
Logos on His fifth chain? Consider in
answering this which initiation makes of a planetary Logos the Logos of a
sacred planet. Is Venus a sacred
planet? When planetary Logoi take
initiation in one of Their chains, do you believe that the number of the
initiation is always the same as the number of the chain upon which the
initiation is being taken?
53. p. 387:
Given what you have been able to learn about planetary and cosmic
initiations, which center in the Solar Logos do you believe was stimulated
prior to the taking of a major initiation by the Venusian Logos upon His fifth
chain? Was the Venus Scheme the center
which was stimulated? Is there any
reason to connect the Triangle of Earth, Mars and Venus with the Solar Logos
solar plexus?
54. p. 387:
Contemplate the number 104 in relation to the number of Kumaras which
are said to have come from Venus to the Earth.
Are we speaking here of the Venus Chain of the Earth Scheme? What is the significance of 104? What is its numerological significance? What is the numerological significance of the
number 105? How are the numbers five and
six significant to the Venusian planetary Logos at this time? How are the numbers five and six significant
to the planetary Logos of Earth at this time?
The number 108 is also considered extremely important. Can you relate 108 to 105 in a meaningful
manner? Do you think the Buddhas of
Activity who came with Sanat Kumara were numbered among the 104? Why or why not?
55. p. 387:
If a Buddha of Activity is "active love wisdom" and a
planetary Logos is also active love wisdom, what does this tell us about the
status of our Buddhas of Activity? Can
you find a reference in The Rays and the Initiations (Rule XII, I
believe) which throws light upon the status of these Buddhas?
56. p. 387:
What does the following mean: "These Entities are divided into
three groups of thirty‑five each, and in Themselves embody the three
major centres of the planetary Logos, those three groups which we know as the
'three departments'..." Which
Entities are here discussed? In what way
can a "department" be considered a "centre" within a
planetary Logos?
57. p. 388:
Consider the following divisions of Kumara and elaborate upon their
significance:
1.
35—35—7—7—7—7—7
2.
15—15—15—15—15—15—15
58. p. 388:
Who are the "three Kumaras" herein discussed? Are They the Buddhas of Activity? What does it meant that they are "fivefold"? What is the significance of the number
"fifteen" and how does fifteen relate to 105? In what way is the number "sixteen"
related to the three Kumaras plus Sanat Kumara?
59. p. 388:
Can it be said that the present Masters of the Wisdom substitute in any
way for the original Kumaras who descended from the Venus Chain?
60. p. 388:
A very mysterious reference is herein made to the ways in which the
three Kumaras are associated with "a particular centre which is involved
in the coming Initiation of the Heavenly Man, and to which the human units at
this time, and during this greater cycle, belong". Ostensibly, the coming Initiation is the
fourth. What center could be referred to
and why? (See The Rays and the
Initiations—Tabulation of Initiations.
As part of your thinking, please count the number of petals in the Ajna
center and take note of its numerological sum.
61. p. 388:
Can you think of a geometrical figure or arrangement which might be
representative of a group of fifteen Kumaras?
62. p. 388:
Give your interpretation of seven groups of fifteen Kumaras each as
"focal points for the force or influence emanating from the other solar
centres or schemes". In what way
that you can conceive could a group of fifteen Kumaras be related to a
particular greater Ashram within the Hierarchy?
63. p. 388:
Do you think that all Kumaras or Their Substitutes are Shamballic
Beings? Or could some of Them be
considered hierarchical Beings? Why or
why not?
64. p. 388:
If the great Beings, the Kumaras, form "the seven divisions of the
occult Hierarchy" do you think this statement refers only to the occult
Hierarchy of our particular globe, or could it have a wider meaning? If so, what kind of meaning?
65. p. 388:
When it is said of the Kumaras that "they exist, as does the
Heavenly Man Himself, in etheric matter, and are literally great Wheels, or
centres of living Fire, manasic and electric fire", what type of etheric
matter is here indicated? What meaning
do you give to the idea that these Beings are literally "great Wheels"?
66. p. 388:
It is said that the Kumaras "make a planetary triangle within the
chain, and each of Them vitalises one globe". Refer to the chart of the Earth Chain on p.
385 and see if you can discover the indicated triangle. Two types of division of the Kumaras (by
three and by seven) are indicated in the quotation referenced in this
question. In what way do you understand
this division?
67. pp. 388‑389: Although certainty does not exist for us on
the following questions, offer a hypothesis with an explanation of why.
1. Which Ray, or logoic emanation is embodied
by our planetary Logos?
2. Which centre in the solar system is called
the Earth scheme?
3. Which scheme is our polar opposite, or
which Heavenly Man is most closely allied to ours?
4. Which particular centre in the body of the
planetary Logos is our Logos at present endeavouring to vitalise?
68. p. 389:
What will be the value of calling planetary chains by their number
instead of by the names presently given?
Do you see any value of significance in the names as presently given?
69. p. 390:
We are told that during the fifth round our planetary Logos will have
attained the initiation which is his present goal? Will this be the fourth Initiation which
presently lies before him, (c.f. p. 384) or will it be the second Cosmic
Initiation?
70. p. 390:
Which do you believe to be the synthesizing planet to which Venus will
transfer Her life? Why?
71. p. 390:
We read on this page of the "fifth round of the Venusian
scheme" which will be closing in the coming fifth round of our planetary
chain. Do you think this fifth round is
actually a scheme round or is it
connected with one of the Venusian chains?
72. p. 390:
In our fifth round, Mercury will reach the apotheosis of
achievement. Does this suggest that
Mercury will be completing its development relatively simultaneously with the
planetary Logos of Venus or that Venus will complete and become obscured first?
73. p. 390:
What, do you think, will be the quality of the systemic triangle of Mercury,
Mars and Earth. What do you learn when
you examine the diagram for these three schemes found on p. 373?
74. p. 390:
When you contemplate the relationship between the Earth Chain, Mercury
Chain and Venus Chain of the Earth Scheme, how do you think this triangle
relates to the development of man? Which
centers in the planetary Logos of our scheme might these three chains
represent?
75. p. 390:
Logoic kundalini will pass from a triangle consisting of the Earth,
Venus and what other scheme, to a triangle
consisting of the Earth, Mars and Mercury Schemes. What "certain great logoic centre will
be vitalized" in this process?
76. p. 390:
When in the coming fifth round "an entirely new group of human
beings will sweep into incarnation in our Earth scheme" what group of
entities is meant? Are these entities
present in any way now, during the fourth round of the Earth Chain?
77. p. 391:
To which planetary scheme will the two-fifths of humanity still focussed
on the astral plane be transferred after the "Judgment Day" of the
fifth round? Why do you think so?
78. p. 391:
Will Mercurian life synthesise before or after life on Venus? What is the synthesizing planet connected
with Mercury? Why do you think so?
79. p. 391:
Connect the idea of the "Judgment Day" with the point of
attainment of our planetary Logos.
80. p. 391:
Give your interpretation of the following: "... this present
struggle has been to test the ability of the entities within the present human
forms to appreciate their mental forces, and through the power of MIND to
transcend feeling, or pain". From
your own experience, how can MIND assist in this transcendence?
81. p. 391:
Can you imagine how the struggle in the fifth round will cause the
present world unrest to seem as nothing"?
82. p. 391:
What would be the nature of the struggle between "higher and lower
mind" in which "the battle ground will be the causal body"? What does this sentence mean to you?
83. p. 391:
Explain how the causal body can be considered the result of the
antecedent actions of man and a seed as
well?
84. p. 392:
Please give your interpretation of the following statement: "By the
rarest fire of True Wisdom the body of avidya (i.e., the causal body) will be
reduced to ashes." Why is the
causal body called the "body of avidya" (ignorance)?
85. p. 392:
Give your interpretation of the nature of the following struggle:
"The struggle in the fifth round, being on mental levels, will be between
Egos and egoic groups, each working consciously, and with intellectual
application, to bring about certain group results". In this struggle, which of the contenders should prevail and why?
86. p. 392:
The result of this struggle in the fifth round will result, it is said,
in "the ultimate triumph of Spirit over matter". Why is it fitting that this triumph occur in
the fifth round? What, practically
speaking, will be the result of this triumph?
87. p. 392:
What, do you suppose, will be the fate of the black lodge at the
"Judgment Day"?
88. p. 392:
Why is the fifth round an appropriate time for the beginning of
obscuration?
89. p 392:
What thoughts occur to you when you read that "our Earth should now
be in her fifth round, and paralleling the Venusian scheme, but the moon chain
of our scheme saw a period of temporary retardation of the evolutionary
process of our Heavenly Man". Based
upon this thought, it appears that the exact duration of a round is not set and
fixed, but is variable according to the progress of the Heavenly Man for whom
it represents a kind of incarnation.
What thoughts come to you in this respect?
90. p. 392:
Why are the members of the black lodge called the "Lords of the
Dark Face"? Why are they called
"the inherent forces of matter"?
91. p. 392:
Does it strike you as strange or unusual that when the triumph at the
fifth round of our fourth chain occurs, that obscuration will begin for the entire planetary scheme?
92. p. 392:
Do the readings on this page suggest that the period of the Moon Chain
focus saw antagonistic forces arrayed against our planetary Logos? If so, how so? What, in a few words, were the principal
causes of defeat upon the Moon Chain?
93. p. 393:
What does it mean that during the third root‑race there occurred
"the individualisation, in physical form, of the Avatar"? Who was the Avatar and what form of individualization
is meant—surely not the same kind of individualization that made of animal man
a human being?
94. p. 393:
Does the term "Divine Manasaputra", as used here, refer to the
planetary Logos of the Earth Scheme or to the Lord of the World (i.e., Sanat
Kumara)? What mystery is concealed in
equating the two terms, "Divine Manasaputra" and "Lord of the
World"? From what you are reading
in these paragraphs, can you determine the major reason necessitating the
taking of form by the Divine Manasaputra?
What had it to do with His previous failure during His own Moon Chain?
95. p. 393:
Give your interpretation of the summary of the definition of manas:
"... it is the active will, intelligently applied, of an Entity, and then
that this active intelligent will affects all lesser lives in cyclic evolution
within the Body of that particular actively willing Existence".
96. p. 393:
Explain the sources of manas for a solar system, for a planetary scheme
and within a planetary scheme.
97. p. 394:
What does it do for your sense of cosmic perspective to read the
following: "To the life of that little entity we call an atom in the
physical body of a man, the Thinker in the causal body, his greater directing
intelligence, is as obscure and unknown as the Logos is to the Thinker, Man,
himself. The analogy is nevertheless
accurate". Is it justifiable to
call man an atom in comparison to a solar Logos? To what Entity is man a cell?
II. THE POSITION OF MANAS
98. p. 395:
Discuss the appropriateness of the following definition of manas: "manas is the intelligent purpose of
some Being, working out in active objectivity".
99. p. 395:
Give your thoughts about the "resolution of the 'hexagon' or the
six‑pointed star, into the five‑pointed star".
100. pp. 395‑396: What does it mean that the Lords of Karma are
the "sole recipients of the mind purposes of that cosmic ENTITY Who
enfolds our solar Logos within His consciousness"? What has the star Sirius to do with the
principle of Karma?
101. pp. 395‑396: Attempt to give a practical and meaningful
explanation of the Six Shaktis listed in the footnote on pp. 395‑396. Explain the order in which the shaktis are
listed, then correlate them with the Creative Hierarchies listed on pp. 34‑35
of Esoteric Astrology. If there
are six shaktis and six Schools of Indian Philosophy, can you find a
correspondence between the two sets of sixes?
102. p. 396:
Give your interpretation of the following: "It is upon the
Hierarchies and the correct number of these Entities that the mystery of the
universe is built".
103. p. 396:
Examine the footnote carefully and give your interpretation of the
number "ten" and the various quotations listed from The Secret
Doctrine in relation to that number.
104. p. 396:
Examine the footnote carefully and give your interpretation of the
number "six" and the various quotations listed from The Secret
Doctrine in relation to that number.
105. p. 396:
Examine the footnote carefully and give your interpretation of the
number "five" and the various quotations listed from The Secret
Doctrine in relation to that number.
106. p. 396:
Give your interpretation of the following: "In the merging of the
five and the six you have the totality of manifestation, the male and female
blended in the Divine Hermaphrodite".
What have Venus and Mercury to do with this statement?
107. p. 396:
Give your interpretation of the first order, the sixth order and the
fifth order. Why is the sixth order
associated with objective form, matter and the not‑Self?
108. p. 396:
From what you know about esoteric astrology and mystical geometry, why
will an alliance between these two sciences release a flood of light upon the
question of the intelligent principle?
109. p. 396:
What is meant by the "inner workings of the Law of Cause and
Effect"?
110. p. 397:
Explain the reason for the following: "... only as the lower mind
is transmuted into the abstract or higher mind and from thence into the
intuition, will man be able to understand the significance of manas".
111. p. 397:
What, in different terminology, is the "archetypal plane" in
connection with the Logos?
112. pp. 397‑398: What thoughts come to you as you study the
following definition of man: "... man is Spirit or the Self, working
through matter of the Not‑Self, by means of the intelligence or manas
...".
113. p. 398:
What are the implications of the following statement: "... by means
of the principle of manas form is
built"?
114. p. 398:
Explain the "Builders" as "those entities who are the
embodiment of Universal Mind". Why is it said that the Builders "are
the Divine Manasaputras in their comprehensive totality"?
115. p. 398:
What do you learn from the following?: "... man ... [is] the
repository (through the Heavenly Man of Whose body he forms a part) of the
purpose of the Logos, and the devas in all their higher grades [are] the
cohesive attractive factor which manipulates matter, and which moulds it into
shape".
116. p. 398:
Why are the fourth, fifth and sixth Creative Hierarchies particularly
concerned with manifestation in etheric matter?
117. p. 398:
Interpret the following: "When the five and the four are perfectly
blended, we shall have achieved the nine of a major initiation, and when the six
is added we shall have the resolution into one of the groups embodied by a
Kumara ..." Which major
initiation? Relate the idea of a kumaric
group, the number fifteen and the blending of these three Creative
Hierarchies. What sort of group is
embodied by a Kumara? Could such a group
be an entire Ashram? Does 4+5+6 yield an
initiatory condition equivalent to chohanship?
118. p. 399:
What is your interpretation of the resolution of the six‑pointed
star finally into the five‑pointed star?
119. p. 399:
Explain manas as a "basic factor of the process and the means
whereby the link is made between the abstract and the concrete".
120. p. 399:
Explain "THE PATH" in manasic terms.
121. p. 399:
Give your interpretation of the four means listed for building the
channel which is "THE PATH".
122. p. 399:
What is the meaning of the familiar idea that "the antaskarana is
itself but illusion"?
123. p. 399:
Trace the progress of man as he moves from the six to the five to the
three. Explain what it means for man to
be "resolved into the four".
124. p. 400:
What would it mean to become part of the consciousness of the "four
great Maharajas"? Are the four
Maharajas greater than the Heavenly Men?
If so, why so?
125. p. 400:
Which, in your opinion, are the "four Heavenly Men Who embody (with
their synthesising third) logoic manas"?
126. p. 400:
Give your interpretation of the following highly occult statement:
"Karma works through manas, and only as the six‑pointed star (or
sumtotal of concrete mind in its various division) becomes the five‑pointed
star, or the synthesis of the lower into the abstract or higher, is the
transmutation into the three, or the Spiritual Triad, made possible via the
four, or the formless repositories of karmic purpose; thus is liberation
achieved, thus is man set free, and the microcosm attains BEING without the
necessity of form‑taking".
127. p. 400:
Give your interpretation of the following statements concerning the
microcosmic transition from the six to the three: "When the microcosm has
transcended the three worlds of matter and has become the five pointed star, he
passes into the consciousness of the Monad, or pure Spirit, via the fourth
plane of buddhi. For him the buddhic
plane is the plane of karmic correspondence.
On it he enters into the sphere of conscious co‑operation in the
working out of karma for a Heavenly Man, having completely worked out his
personal karma in the lower three spheres". What is your interpretation of the idea that
the buddhic plane is the "plane of karmic correspondence"?
128. p. 400:
Which planes do you think "correspond to the buddhic plane, for a
Heavenly Man and for a solar Logos"?
129. p. 401:
Give your interpretation of the following highly occult summary
statement: "The fire of matter ... is the dynamic fire of motion, which
keeps in activity each atom of matter.
The fire of mind is the coherent impulse and purpose, driving the forms
(built up of active matter) in a specific direction, and along certain destined
paths. It is consequently karmic impulse, originating cause, and operating
will. It is likewise the result or the
effect of this action in time, and only as the Triad comes into play, via the
esoteric four, are the fires of both mind and matter burnt out and the fire of
Spirit set free".
130. p. 401:
Explain the sum 4+4+1=9 as the equation of man devoid of that which is
not a principle.
131. p. 401:
What are the five ways in which the manasic principle manifests? What has Wisdom to do with the number six,
and pure will and power with the number seven?
Explain the transition from the five to the six which is the two and
thence to the seven which is the one.
132. p. 401:
Why must knowledge, or the number five, be fulfilled before
transmutation into wisdom, or number six, is possible?
133. p. 402:
Which are the five Kumaras awaiting the final resolution? Are these planetary Kumaras or systemic
Kumaras or both? To how many levels is
the term "Kumara" applicable?
134. p. 402:
Give your interpretation of the difference between transmutation and
the final resolution of the transmuted essences into their synthesis. Look at the planetary and human levels in
your analysis.
135. p. 402:
Why does the Tibetan say the following?: "... until it is known
which cosmic Logos recognises our solar Logos as a centre in His body, and
which six other systems are affiliated with ours, it will not be possible to
touch upon the systemic stage of manasic development". Have you any idea
which cosmic Logos it is? Is the ONE
ABOUT WHOM NAUGHT MAY BE SAID a cosmic Logos?
Why or why not? What are some
possibilities for stars which number among the six other systems?
136. p. 402:
What is your interpretation of the thought that "Brahma and Vishnu
allied, go to the totality of the Divine Manasaputras"?
137. p. 403:
Give your interpretation of Brahma, Vishnu and Mahadeva in relation to
the hexagon with a point at the center.
138. p. 403:
In relation to the following statement—"This fivefold Brahma aspect
or the five Kumaras, are in full‑manifestation, and, with the reflection
of the other two aspects, make the seven of our manifested system"—what
are the reflection of the other two
aspects? Why reflection?
139. p. 403:
From your experience, what is the process by which manas is transmuted
into Love‑Wisdom?
140. p. 403:
What is special about the proportion 3/5? Why, do you suppose, is the process of
transmutation for a planetary Logos entered upon when 3/5 of its human and deva
units are entering upon the Path? What
does this proportion tell us about transmutation and the Judgment Day? What might be the parallel to this process
and to this proportion in the life of the microcosm, man?
141. p. 403:
Contrast the faculty of mind as an instrument for creative use with its
usual role as "slayer of the real".
142. p. 403: Connect the fact that the Earth, Mars,
Jupiter, Saturn and Vulcan are as yet developing manas with the chain and globe
focus of each of these planetary Logoi (c.f. Esoteric Astrology, p.
693).
143. p. 403:
What do you learn from the following anent the transmutation of human
and deva units within the Earth Scheme and the Vulcan Scheme?: "The Earth
scheme has about one fifth in process of transmutation in one or other of the
globes at this time and Vulcan has very nearly two fifths"? Remember that those units individualized upon
the Moon Chain comprise, very largely, the aspirants and advanced units of
humanity? We have also been told that
approximately 85% of human units are still kama‑manasic? Putting this information with the idea that
there are sixty billion human monads, can we arrive at any conclusion about the
number of human units which individualized on the Moon Chain?
144. p. 403:
Within the Earth Scheme, do deva units or human units predominate? Can you justify your answer with a reference
from A Treatise on Cosmic Fire?
145. p. 403:
If in some planetary schemes deva units predominate, which planetary
schemes do you think they would be? Why?
146. p. 403:
Give your interpretation of the deva kingdom as "active creative
force".
147. p. 404:
Discuss the necessarily close relationship between "the fifth deva
Hierarchy and the fifth logoic principle".
148. p. 404:
Is the Heavenly Man, Himself, a Deva?
Why or why not? Consider that a Heavenly Man is a Manasaputra and a
"Builder".
149. p. 404: Give your interpretation of the
following: "The sumtotal of manas is pure deva essence, and it is only as
union is made between this fivefold third aspect and the other two aspects that
what we understand as MAN—whether Heavenly Man or human—comes into being".
150. p. 404:
Comment on the following: "The Messengers, the Builders, the devas,
are flaming fire, radiant electric matter, and only in time and space, only
during manifestation and only through the cycles of objectivity, is such an
entity as man possible, or can a Heavenly Man come into existence".
151. p. 404:
What does it mean that "radiant electric substance, active,
intelligent ether" [is] "ensouled by the deva evolution"?
152. p 404:
Discuss the difference between Devas and Pitris as presented in Some
Thoughts on the Gita.
153. p. 405:
Discuss the difference between cosmic electricity and the electrical
akasha of the system.
154. p. 405:
Discuss the manner in which "pure Spirit" or "abstract
conscious Being" is "impelled by the attractive quality of its
opposite pole, intelligent substance, to blend with it".
155. p. 405:
Why should it be that "the meeting of these two polarities, and
their point of merging, causes that flash in the cosmic universe which we call
a sun, and results in light or objectivity".
156. p. 405:
Contrast the "electric fire of pure Spirit" with
"electrical substance". Why
are both called electric?
157. p. 405:
What is the practical significance for man that "the deva evolution
controls for the greater portion of manifestation up to the beginning of the
transmutative process"? What have
Venus and the number five to do with the initiation of the transmutative
process?
158. p. 405:
Referencing the footnote, discuss the middle loka or plane as "the
point in which the Deva essence is changed into Pitric essence or the no loka
is made fit to appear as a loka down below or the unmanifested becomes the
manifested".
159. p. 405:
Which are the two schemes which will be entering into obscuration? If you know the names of these schemes, what
are their correspondences in the life of microcosmic man? How does the resolving process in the life of
man involve the correspondences to these two schemes?
160. pp. 405‑406: Give your interpretation of the following:
"The four schemes which form the logoic Quaternary will merge into their
synthesising scheme, that of Saturn, while Venus and Mercury will merge into
Uranus and Neptune. No importance need
be attached to the sequence of these names.
The dual fact is all that is necessary to grasp". Why does the Tibetan add the last two
sentences? Is there a blind here or a
revelation?
161. p. 406:
What does it mean that "Uranus and Neptune are reflections of the
logoic astral and mental permanent atoms" while Saturn is in fact the
correspondence to the logoic physical permanent atom"? Why the use of the term reflections? The Tibetan states further that "this is
an occult mystery and must not be separated from its allied truth in the cosmic
scheme". What does he mean by
"the cosmic scheme"? What is a
cosmic scheme? In a cosmic scheme what
would be the higher correspondences to Uranus, Neptune and Saturn? Would our solar Logos and his vehicle of
manifestation, a solar system, be in some way involved, or not?
162. p. 406:
What is the justification for "viewing manas as the vibratory
activity of all atoms"?
163. p. 406:
What is a "spirilla" within the structure of the atom?
164. p. 406:
What has the intense vibratory activity of the fourth spirilla (herein
referenced) to do with moksha or with
the possibility of the destruction of the causal body? What, in your estimation, would be a
"form composed of matter which responds to the vibration of the fifth
spirilla"?
165. p. 406:
What are the implications of the fact that "the large number of
discarnate entities at this stage who are willing to make contact with the
physical plane are clothed in matter of [the fourth] ether"? What does the impending discovery of the
fourth ether suggest anent the possibility of uniting the subjective and
objective worlds?
166. p. 407:
A round is a cycle of long duration.
We are told that the devas of the fourth ether will come to be known
before the end of this round. What does
this suggest about the speed of the process by means of which humanity will
communicate with the deva kingdom?
167. p. 407:
Judging from your own experience, how can the buddhic plane be realized
by the aid of manas? What are the means
by which "manas is transmuted into wisdom"?
168. p. 407:
How, in practical terms, could one describe the overlapping of the
manasic and buddhic principle? Consider
the Tibetan's method of numerological addition with reference to manas and
buddhi. What is implicit in the way He
arrives at the number nine by adding the four and the five? Using this principle of addition, what would
be the significance, for instance, of the number eleven? Or the number six? Are there a number of ways to derive
numerological significances? For
instance? How is 2+4, different from
3+3?
169. p. 407:
The Tibetan speaks of the "fourth Kumara". Is He here speaking in a systemic or
planetary context? If in a systemic context,
Who or What might be this fourth Kumara?
In what way would you find it possible to link the fourth Kumara with
Buddhi and the buddhic plane?
170. p. 407:
What will be the result of the mass of humanity gradually passing on to
the fourth subplane of the mental plane?
What is the serious condition which the Hierarchy will have to handle
unless the mass transfer to the fourth subplane is paralleled by a steady
influx of egos on to the buddhic plane?
171. p. 407:
Discuss the functions of the four Maharajas and the Lipikas with
reference to the numbers four and five.
In what way are the Lipikas approached by means of the number five, and
how is Sirius involved in this approach?
172. p. 407:
What kind of activity is being discussed when the Tibetan writes that
"... the Lipika Lords dispense the law to those who have merged themselves
with their divine principle, and are no longer held by the material forms of
the three worlds"? Over how many
worlds, then, may it be presumed that the Lipika Lords preside?
173. p. 408:
What does the Tibetan mean by "the apparent confusion caused by the
overlapping of cycles"? To what
does the Tibetan attribute the chaos of our point of view and the many seeming
contradictions which we encounter?
174. p. 408:
What is the value of the formula 2n‑1?
175. p. 408:
What are the general meanings of the three terms: Position, Relation, and
Limitation? Why are these three
outstanding features, emerging from our studies, so important?
176. pp. 408‑409: What do you learn from an examination of the
summary found under the broad generalization called Position?
177. p. 409:
Which type of ONE ABOUT WHOM
NAUGHT MAY BE SAID is discussed under the section called "An ensouling life"?
178. p. 409:
Why is the power to evolve or
progress "the peculiar and perfected attribute of the fifth
principle"?
179. p. 409:
What has the capacity to cohere to
do with the transmutation of manas into wisdom?
Link the second systemic law to the foregoing idea.
180. p. 410:
What does it mean that "only the Heavenly Men and Their superior
embracing lives are ... perfected manas"?
181. p. 410:
What of value would emerge from "the study of the different
polarities of the different spheres"?
182. p. 410:
Consider the different eight different kinds of relations which could be
elucidated. What would be the value of
this elucidation?
183. p. 410:
How is the principle of Relation governed
by the law of Attraction and Repulsion?
184. p. 411:
In what way does it make sense that "self consciousness itself is
the result of the manasic principle"?
185. p. 411:
How is it that "the two factors of mind and love‑wisdom"
can be related, respectively, to the two laws of Attraction and Synthesis?
186. p. 411:
Discuss the principle of Limitation
and the three suppositions of capacity,
duality and purpose that are associated with it.
187. p. 411:
Why does the Tibetan write the following: "When these three factors
(Position, Relation and Limitation) are studied within the system, the close
connection of all groups within the whole will be evidenced and the need of
each part for all other parts will be brought out".
188. p. 411:
What thoughts occur to you when you read that "As regards cosmic
position, relation and limitation ... e'en to the Heavenly Men Themselves the
matter is obscure"?
189. pp. 411‑412: What sort of limitation is the Tibetan
placing upon our studies by stating the following?: "Therefore, we can do
no more than accept the fact of the inconceivable magnitude of that EXISTENCE
which is manifesting through seven solar systems, and the extension of this
concept of Being to embrace the entire vault of the Heavens".
190. p. 412:
What may be the implications of the idea that "there may lie back
of everything visible a vast realm or realms of Existences" (presumably,
invisible)?
191. p. 412:
Share your thoughts in relation to the following: "... just as
there are tens of millions of human beings out of objective manifestation, or
discarnate, on the subtler planes of the solar system, so there may be cosmic
entities, in rank equal to the ONE ABOUT WHOM NAUGHT MAY BE SAID, Who are in a
similar sense discarnate, and found in realms subtler than that of the
manifestation of light".
192. p. 412:
Explain the following statement: "... the Lord of the World, the
first Kumara, is the planetary Logos of our scheme in physical incarnation
...".
193. p. 412:
What are the implications of the fact that our planetary Logos finds
place within the logoic Quaternary?
194. p. 412:
Here we are told of the importance of the five Kumaras. Yet the three Buddhas of Activity plus the Sanat
Kumara come to a total of four Kumaras.
Who or What is the fifth Kumara and what relation does this Kumara have
to the four just mentioned?
195. p. 412:
What are the implications of each of the Buddhas of Activity being
connected with one of the planetary Logoi Who, with the Logos of our Earth,
make up the Logoic Quaternary? What
might these three other planets be?
Would Venus be included? Or
Mars? If so why? If not why not?
196. p. 412:
Discuss the concept of the "three esoteric Kumaras". For which planetary Logoi would They be
vice-regents? Is it possible to link up
the esoteric Kumaras with information to be found on p. 873 anent various
kinds of Buddhas of Activity?
197. p. 412:
At the bottom of this page the Tibetan appears to give the three
exoteric Buddhas and the three esoteric Buddhas a significant position within
the Earth Chain. Does this point of view
contrast with what is stated on page 873?
198. p. 412:
Earlier we read of the 104 Kumaras plus the Sanat Kumara, making 105. Now we read of three esoteric Kumaras, giving
us a total of 108, associated especially with our globe. Why is the number 108 of special
significance? What can we make of the
fact that twelve divides into 108 nine times?
199. p. 413:
Here we learn that "each chain corresponds to one centre" in a
planetary scheme, and that seven Kumaras are "centres in the body of the
planetary Logos". What are the
implications?
200. p. 413:
What evidence exists that there are globe Kumaras, chain Kumaras, scheme
Kumaras and systemic Kumaras?
201. p. 413:
Consider the structure of a generic chakra. What are "lesser wheels [to be found]
within any particular centre"? In
relation to a human chakra, what would such wheels represent? Petals?
202. p. 413:
What light does the fact that there are in fact seven Kumaras shed upon the five Earth‑related
Kumaras Who are the sum total of manas on Earth?
203. p. 413:
Consider the following: "The life of the Logos in this incarnation
on the earth is flowing through three centres and beginning to stimulate a
fourth, hence four globes are involved and the three Kumaras (so called for
lack of a better term) are vitally intelligently active; three are in abeyance
and one is beginning to function ...
This fourth Kumara is as yet practically unrealised, but as hinted at
earlier His day is about to dawn".
Who is this "fourth Kumara"?
Which four globes are involved?
Is the Sanat Kumara, the fourth Kumara or the seventh Kumara? Does He occupy a position of middle status or
the highest status?
204. p. 413:
Interpret the following very occult statement anent the Kumaras:
"They are, in fact, the agents for the Lords of the Rays to the Monads of
any ray in incarnation in any particular chain and on any particular
globe".
205. p. 413:
Consider the four types of Beings for which the scheme Kumaras act as
Agents? What do you learn from this
tabulation?
206. p. 413:
What drastic measures do you suppose were employed by the Kumaras
(presumably the scheme Kumaras) to offset the failure on the Moon Chain?
207. p. 414:
On this page the Tibetan gives a most important explanation concerning
why the Moon Chain is missing from charts which diagram the present structure
of our planetary Scheme. Why in the
distant path, do you suppose, the Moon Chain would have been portrayed and the
Neptune Chain omitted? How would the
numbering and ordering of the chains have been affected?
208. p. 414:
A great mystery is discussed concerning the absorbing of the Moon Chain
by the Earth Chain. When this happened
did another chain, namely the Neptune Chain, flash into objectivity? Why or why not?
209. p. 414:
The Uranus Chain is herein discussed.
Does the Uranus Chain exist at the this moment even though it is not objective?
What are subjective chains in any planetary scheme?
210. p. 415:
Do you believe the ten schemes are always objective, or a mixture of
subjective and objective? What are your
reasons? What are the implications
either way? Assuming a condition of
partial objectivity and partial subjectivity (an arupa state) why is it reasonable
to assume that there are not always three chains in a subjective condition, but
that the number varies?
211. p. 415:
How does the mystery of the Moon connect to the mystery of the
"eighth sphere"?
212. p. 415:
Given the possibility of ten planetary chains per scheme, is reasonable
to assume that there may be more than one physical planet per scheme? Consider that the Earth scheme now has,
apparently, two physical planets—the Moon and the Earth? Do you think that the Earth Chain actually
had a physical planet when the Moon Chain had a physical planet, or did the
physical planet of the Earth Chain form afterwards?
213. pp. 415‑416: Study the number sequences: 7‑3‑10;
3‑7‑10; 10‑7‑3. What do they mean? When were these various sequences
operative? How can these numbers be
connected with the involution, evolution and development of the human being?
214. p. 415:
What are you principal learnings from the profound lessons in occultism
concerning the various chains within the Earth Scheme?
215. p. 415:
How might the principle that "nature abhors a vacuum" apply to
the disappearance and appearance of planetary chains?
216. p. 415:
What significance do you attribute to the fact that it was the Neptune
Chain which "arose over the horizon, and took its place as one of the
seven manifesting chains of the planetary Logos" when the Earth Chain
absorbed the life of the Moon Chain?
217. p. 415:
Would it be reasonable to conclude that the Uranus Chain will flash into
objectivity when the Venus Chains and Mercury Chains merge? Do you think that
a merging of the Venus and Mercury Chains is likely since both of those planets
are either now entering obscuration or will do so in the relatively near
future as time is counted on a planetary scale?
218. p. 415:
What does it mean, practically speaking that the life of the
"second and first Logos has been withdrawn from it [the Moon] and only the
latent life of matter itself remains"?
219. p. 415:
In what way is/was the Moon Chain unique among chains, not only within
our planetary Scheme but within our entire solar system? What speculation would you hazard?
220. p. 416:
Give your interpretation of the following: "Our Heavenly Man ... is
esoterically allied to one of the seven solar systems, and in this mysterious
alliance is hidden the mystery of the moon chain"? What would be the characteristics of such a
solar system if it were to have been previously associated with the Moon Chain?
221. p. 416:
Is there any logic to the thought that there may be triangles of force
between the Rishis of the Great Bear, the Seven Solar Systems and the chains of
the various planetary schemes?
222. p. 416:
What thoughts occur to you when you consider the following septenates:
the seven stars of the Great Bear; the seven major Pleiades; the seven stars of
the Sirian system; the seven solar systems of which ours is one; the seven
Heavenly Men; the seven objective chains of each Heavenly Man; the seven
objective globes within any particular chain of any particular Heavenly Man?
223. p. 416:
Why is it considered that the Moon chain was a chain where a systemic
failure was to be seen? Why was not this
failure merely the failure of our planetary Logos?
224. p. 416:
What might be the explanation for the following: "The sexual misery
of this planet finds its origin in the moon failure"?
225. p. 416:
What speculations do you have concerning the manner in which suffering
upon the Earth Chain is related to the failure upon the Moon Chain?
226. p. 416:
Sanat Kumara is apparently known as the "Silent Watcher"? This term is also used in another way. Please peruse Initiation Human and Solar
and elucidate another way in which the term "Silent Watcher" is used.
227. p. 416:
Consider the following and comment: Our planet merits the name "the
Sphere of Suffering".
"Conditions of agony and distress such as are found on our planet
are found in no such degree in any other scheme".
228. p. 416:
Read the long footnote from The Secret Doctrine concerning the
"Great Sacrifice" and offer your response. What is inspired in you as you read H.P.B.'s
description of this Great Life?
229. p 417:
What sort of vibratory power is now misused and the functioning of which
center is now perverted and distorted due to the Moon Chain failure?
230. p. 417:
Attempt to give a speculative interpretation of the following:
"Certain results, such as the finding of its polar opposite, were hastened
unduly on the moon chain, and the consequence was an uneven development and a
retardation of the evolution of a certain number of deva and human
groups". What might be the problem
in the premature finding of the polar opposite? Examine this problem within the human context
and give your interpretation.
231. p. 417:
Why do you suppose the origin of the feud between the Lords of the Dark
Face and the Brotherhood of Light can be traced to the Moon Chain? Do you suppose that the term Lords of the
Dark Face have anything to do with the face of the Moon which never faces the
Earth?
232. p. 417:
The Tibetan speaks of the numbering
of the chains and globes, and yet tells us that "the sequence of
numbers has no reference or relation to space or time, nor to sequence of
appearance or order of manifestation".
Then to what might it have reference?